similar to: a rounding option for \Sexpr{}?

Hi, I have spent a few hours on the R-exts manual and the documentation of parse_Rd() (as well as the PDF document in the references), but I still have not figured out what results=rd means. I thought I could use an R code fragment to create an Rd fragment dynamically. Here is an example, in which I was expected the output to be a describe list <DL> in HTML, but it turns out not to be true.

Dear List, First off, my deepest gratitude to the Sweave developers: this tool has improved my quality greatly. A question in my work I use \Sexpr{} statements scalar values and the xtable package for all manner of tables. What I'd like to do is to use a vector inline, rather than a whole separate table. Something like: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% begin code % Latex junk % Sweave block:

Dear R developers, I asked this question in r-help list but have not got a definite solution yet, and I think it might be more appropriate to ask developers or CRAN maintainers directly. Many software packages often have a menu item like "Check for updates" under the "Help" menu, e.g. Filezilla and Firefox, and I believe it is also necessary for R (at least for R GUI under

Hi, Recently I saw a couple of cases in which the package vignettes were somewhat complicated so that Stangle() (or knitr::purl() or other tangling functions) can fail to produce the exact R code that is executed by the weaving function Sweave() (or knitr::knit(), ...). For example, this is a valid document that can pass the weaving process but cannot generate a valid R script to be source()d:

Hi, I guess the backslash should not be used as the separator for strsplit() in compareVersion(), because the period in [.] is no longer a metacharacter (no need to "escape" it using a backslash): https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/trunk/src/library/utils/R/packages.R#L866-L867 > compareVersion function (a, b) { .... a <- as.integer(strsplit(a, "[\\.-]")[[1L]])

Depending on an R computation I would like to include an Sweave documents in the main Sweave document. How can I do it? So I was thinking .... to use Latex features : \newif\ifpaper \ifpaper \SweaveInput{"my1.Rnw"} \else \SweaveInput{"my2.Rnw"} \fi But how do I set paper to true or false given an \Sexpr ?? \papertrue % or \paperfalse Any ideas? cheers -- Witold

Hi, I released knitr 1.1 to CRAN a few days ago: http://cran.r-project.org/package=knitr See all new features and changes at https://github.com/yihui/knitr/blob/master/NEWS.md#changes-in-knitr-version-11 The version 1.0 does not imply perfect stability or maturity. The major version number was bumped from 0.x to 1.x due to a number of important features and the breaking of compatibility with

Hi, I released knitr 1.1 to CRAN a few days ago: http://cran.r-project.org/package=knitr See all new features and changes at https://github.com/yihui/knitr/blob/master/NEWS.md#changes-in-knitr-version-11 The version 1.0 does not imply perfect stability or maturity. The major version number was bumped from 0.x to 1.x due to a number of important features and the breaking of compatibility with

The knitr package version 0.5 is on CRAN now. It has gone through extensive development in the past few months, and about 200 issues were solved (https://github.com/yihui/knitr/issues) thanks to the feedback of users, which greatly improved the quality and usefulness of this package. For a complete list of changes, see https://github.com/yihui/knitr/blob/master/NEWS Most notable new features are:

The knitr package version 0.5 is on CRAN now. It has gone through extensive development in the past few months, and about 200 issues were solved (https://github.com/yihui/knitr/issues) thanks to the feedback of users, which greatly improved the quality and usefulness of this package. For a complete list of changes, see https://github.com/yihui/knitr/blob/master/NEWS Most notable new features are:

Hi, A new package Rd2roxygen has been released on CRAN: http://cran.r-project.org/package=Rd2roxygen (source package available; binaries to come) This package can be useful for developers who used to document their functions in the raw Rd files but want to switch to roxygen now using inline roxygen comments (e.g. me). The main functionality of this package is to parse the Rd files under the

The knitr package was designed to be a transparent engine for dynamic report generation with R, solve some long-standing problems in Sweave, and combine features in other add-on packages into one package. It is a general-purpose package, and currently supports LaTeX, HTML and Markdown (still extensible). See the package website [1] to get started; see the package manuals ([2], [3] and [4]) for a

The knitr package was designed to be a transparent engine for dynamic report generation with R, solve some long-standing problems in Sweave, and combine features in other add-on packages into one package. It is a general-purpose package, and currently supports LaTeX, HTML and Markdown (still extensible). See the package website [1] to get started; see the package manuals ([2], [3] and [4]) for a

Hello, Here's an example that renders correctly using Rd2txt / Rd2latex / R CMD Rd2pdf, but has problems under Rd2HTML: \name{foo} \title{foo} \section{foo}{ This should be on a separate paragraph This should be on a separate paragraph This should be on a separate paragraph \Sexpr[stage=render,results=rd]{ paste( rep('Sexpr: This should be on a separate

# HG changeset patch # User Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com> # Date 1360861948 -3600 # Node ID 0f9c7503650fa1b1103b769e1129d66ff614b2ad # Parent cffb489a6df37d8d114e7d2d53a7a85d14e8f968 tools/xend: Only add cpuid and cpuid_check to sexpr once When converting a XendConfig object to sexpr, cpuid and cpuid_check were being emitted twice in the resulting sexpr. The first conversion writes

I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD check issues a warning for it. (See below.) Is it intentional that \Sexpr is not allowed at the top level? The Rd grammar allows this, but R CMD check does not. Is there any other way to generate/modify the \examples{} section dynamically? Thanks, Gabor In

Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397) with the following .Rnw file: \documentclass[10pt]{article} \begin{document} This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} %% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} \end{document} The \Sexpr in the second line is processed even though the

Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397) with the following .Rnw file: \documentclass[10pt]{article} \begin{document} This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} %% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} \end{document} The \Sexpr in the second line is processed even though the

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:23 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12/07/2018 6:33 AM, G?bor Cs?rdi wrote: > > I would like to create \examples{} in the manual dynamically, and > > while it is possible to do this with a \Sexpr at the top level, R CMD > > check issues a warning for it. (See below.) > > > > Is it intentional that

Hi, Recently I noticed file.copy() would discard the file mode information. Is this the expected behaviour or a bug for file.copy()? > file.create('testfile') [1] TRUE > file.info('testfile') size isdir mode mtime ctime testfile 0 FALSE 644 2011-03-05 17:06:39 2011-03-05 17:06:39 atime uid gid uname grname