similar to: L-shaped boxes with lattice graphs?

I am failing to get compactPDF to make any change to a pdf file that, a/c to the message from the CRAN upload site, can be very substantially compacted. Any ideas what may be wrong? I have also tried recreating the pdf file. I also tried R CMD build --resave-data --compact-vignettes DAAG The data files compact alright (but I get the 'significantly better compression' warning message

The following is 'semicolon.Rnw' > \SweaveOpts{engine=R, keep.source=TRUE} > > <<xycig-A, eval=f, echo=f>>= > library(SMIR); data(bronchit); library(KernSmooth) > @ % > > Code for panel A is > <<code-xycig-A, eval=f, echo=t>>= > <<xycig-A>> > @ % Sweave("semicolon") yields the following 'semicolon.tex'

The inst/doc directory of the DAAG package has 6 files coral551.spot, ... that are around 0.85 MB each. It would be useful to be able to zip then, but that as matters stand interferes with the use of the Sweave file that uses them to demonstrate input of expression array data that is in the "spot" format. They do not automatically get unzipped when required. I have checked that

I propose the following enhancements and changes to plot.lm(), the most important of which is the addition of a Residuals vs Leverage plot. (1) A residual versus leverage plot has been added, available by specifying which = 5, and not included as one of the default plots. Contours of Cook's distance are included, by default at values of 0.5 and 1.0. The labeled points, if any, are those

I have a file 4lmetc.Rnw, intended for inclusion in a LaTeX document, that starts: \SweaveOpts{engine=R, keep.source=TRUE} \SweaveOpts{eps=FALSE, prefix.string=snArt/4lmetc} The attempt to process the file through Sweave generates the error: > Sweave("4lmetc") Writing to file 4lmetc.tex Processing code chunks ... 1 : keep.source term verbatim Error in file(srcfile$filename, open =

Although the specific behaviour that was reported has been fixed, bugs remain in Sweave's processing of comment lines when keep.source=TRUE This is in some senses a follow-up from earlier bugs. Hence the query -- what is the preferred procedure, to submit a new bug report? (Another option might be to add a comment to the web page for bug 14459.) Is there now a preference to submit via

I get the same style of path as Hadley. This is on Windows 7 Home Premium with SP1. I start R by clicking on the R-2.31.0 icon. I'd assumed that it was a change that came with R-2.13.0! (On 32-bit Windows XP, which I have just checked, I do indeed get the 8.3 paths.) > R.home() [1] "C:/Programs/R/R-2.13.0" > sessionInfo() R version 2.13.0 (2011-04-13) Platform:

i am trying to replicate the following graph using xyplot : attach(x) plot ( jitter(type), mortality, pch=16, xlim = c(0.25, 3.75)) lines ( c(1-0.375,1.375) , c ( median(mortality[type==1]), median(mortality[type==1])), lwd=5,col=2) lines ( c(2-0.375,2.375) , c ( median(mortality[type==2]), median(mortality[type==2])), lwd=5,col=2) lines ( c(3-0.375,3.375) , c ( median(mortality[type==3]),

I came across this notice of an upcoming webinar. The issues identified in the first paragraph below seem to me exactly those that the R project is designed to address. The claim that "most research software is barely fit for purpose compared to equivalent systems in the commercial world" seems to me not quite accurate! Comments! WEBINAR SERIES A Crack in the Code: Why software

Does anyone know any more than is in the following press release about REvolution Computing and their commercialization of R? http://www.intel.com/capital/news/releases/080122.htm "Intel Capital, the global investment arm of Intel Corporation, today announced that it has invested in the Series A financing of REvolution Computing, creator of parallel computing software for computational

Hello, While using the "plot" function against a model with a long formula, I get a garbled label in the bottom of the plot. It looks like there are two lines printed one over another, here's my example: http://pico.magnum2.pl/maciej/NodalInvolvement/MisclassificationRate?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=TwoFactorResiduals.png This was from using

help(letters, htmlhelp=TRUE) fails. Under the Mac OSX gui, the message is 'Help for the topic "a" was not found.' Under the version documented below, and under Windows, the message is "No documentation for 'a' in specified packages and libraries:" repeated for all the elements of letters, then followed by "you could try

Dear R community, I am trying to resolve a discrepancy between the way SPSS and R handle 2-way, repeated measures ANOVA. An experiment was performed in which samples were drawn before and after treatment of four groups of subjects (control and disease states 1, 2 and 3). Each group contained five subjects. An experimental measurement was performed on each sample to yield a

Dear all, I've tried a multiple regression, and now I want to try a cross-validation. I obtain this error (it must be sth related to df) that I don't understand, any help would be appreciated. cv.lm(df= dat, lm2.52f, m=3) Error en `[.data.frame`(df, , ynam) : undefined columns selected lm2.52f is my lm object, dat is a dataframe where the variables involved in .lm are I tried CVlm

I am looking for information on experimentation with the use of R in the teaching of statistics and science in schools. Any leads would be very welcome. I am certain that there is such experimentation. I've made this inquiry on r-sig-teaching, with no response. John. John Maindonald email: john.maindonald at anu.edu.au phone : +61 2 (6125)3473 fax : +61 2(6125)5549 Centre

Hi I have a matrix with 30 observations and roughly 30000 variables, each obs belongs to one of two groups. With svm and slda I get into memory troubles ('cannot allocate vector of size' roughly 2G). PCA LDA runs fine. Are there any way to use the memory issue withe SVM's? Or can you recommend any other classification method for such huge datasets? P.S. I run suse 9.1 on a 2G RAM

In Section 1.4.2 of "Writing R Extensions" %\VignetteEngine{knitr::knitr} should be %\VignetteEngine{knitr::knit} > sessionInfo() R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25) Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 (64-bit) Is this sort of thing best reported here, or is a huge report in order? John Maindonald email: john.maindonald at anu.edu.au phone : +61 2 (6125)3473 fax

<<< Thus factor analysis is in essence a model for the correlation matrix of x, ? = ?'? + ? >>> This should surely be ? = ??' + ? Also line 3 under ?Details? says <<< for a p?element row-vector x, ? >>> x is here surely a column vector, albeit the transpose of a row vector from the data matrix. cf page 322 of ?Modern Applied Statistics with S?, 4th

Dear R community, In the excellent nlme package the default diagnostic plot graphs the innermost residuals against innermost fitted values. I recently fit a mixed-effects model in which there was a very clear positive linear trend in this plot. I inferred that this trend occurred because my fixed effect was a two-level factor, and my random effect was a 12-level factor. The negative residuals

rug() may add integer axis labels when called with a POSIXlt object as argument. dtimes <- c("09/29/2007 12:54", "09/30/2007 00:14", "10/01/2007 00:14", "10/02/2007 00:14", "10/03/2007 00:14", "10/04/2007 00:14", "10/05/2007 00:14", "10/06/2007 00:14", "10/07/2007