similar to: Returning highs and lows in R

Dear R-helpers, I tried the playwith packages for the first time, and it crashed R: > require(playwith) Loading required package: playwith Loading required package: lattice Loading required package: grid Loading required package: gWidgets Loading required package: gWidgetsRGtk2 Loading required package: RGtk2 Loading required package: cairoDevice > sessionInfo() R version 2.7.1

This is a really simple question, I'm sure,but I can't make EpiR work! I keep getting the following: > epi.2by2(47, 263483, 282, 935028, method="cohort.time", conf.level=0.95) Error in epi.2by2(47, 263483, 282, 935028, method = "cohort.time", conf.level = 0.95) : unused argument(s) (935028) and I really don't know why!. Any ideas very very welcome thank

OK my understanding is that with preallocated disks the performance with and without shard will be the same. In any case, please attach the volume profile[1], so we can see what else is slowing things down. -Krutika [1] - https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Monitoring%20Workload/#running-glusterfs-volume-profile-command On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Abi Askushi

Hi I'm building new samba server (on Debian 6.0, software RAID10 2TB, Xeon CPU). Generally everything is working fine, so I have decided to run some stress tests. My choice was dbench. Old server is Debian 4.0 (samba 3.0.24, Athlon 3000+, one ATA 160GB disk). So run dbench 16 on both old and new server The results are strange old serwer: about 300MB/sek (dbench 3.0) and below are first

Hi, My company is testing btrfs (kernel 2.6.38) on a slave MySQL database server with a 195Gb filesystem (of which about 123Gb is used). So far, we''re quite impressed with the performance. Our database loads are high, and if filesystem performance wasn''t good, MySQL replication wouldn''t be able to keep up and the slave latency would begin to climb. This though, is

Hi Krutika, I already have a preallocated disk on VM. Now I am checking performance with dd on the hypervisors which have the gluster volume configured. I tried also several values of shard-block-size and I keep getting the same low values on write performance. Enabling client-io-threads also did not have any affect. The version of gluster I am using is glusterfs 3.8.12 built on May 11 2017

hi Michael, am sorry for the incomplete reply . csv file data havinmg like this , >getSymbols("IBM") >weekly_data = to.weekly(week_name) >dataframe=data.frame(weekly_data) >outputfile_name="F:\\R-programs\\Outputfile.csv" >write.table(dataframe, file =outputfile_name,sep = ",",col.names =TRUE,row.names = T) > datafrom_table <-