similar to: Criteria for individually adressing data ranges within timeseries data

Hi everyone, I experience some problems with adressing of data.frames when I retrieve some information for geographical position (ypos, xpos) ot of a MySQL Database and want to perform some simple statistics. The problem is adressing the dataframes with a construct like rawdata[c(type)] vs. rawdata$TEMPMIN to retrieve the numerical information and not a string (I want to store the numerical

Hi all, I'm trying figure out how to implement support for Small Data Addressing (SDA) for an out-of-tree PowerPC target. The short description of SDA is that small globals are gathered in the same memory area and addressed using a base register + an offset. From what I've seen the Hexagon target already support this but as that target doesn't seem to support writing object files it

Dear all, I'm using R 2.8.1 under Vista. I programmed a Simulation with the code enclosed at the end of the eMail. After the simulation I want to analyse the columns of the single simulation-runs, i.e. e.g. Simulation[[1]][,1] sth. like that but I cannot address these columns... Can anybody please help? Best, Thomas ############################ CODE ############################

Hi Daniel, David, Is there any way of disabling some individual tests on specific architectures? Zero cost exception handling on ARM is known to be broken and there isn't anyone I know working on it with high priority, so it's likely to be that way for a long time. For that reason, I'd like to disable them on ARM, so that I can get a green LNT, making it easier to spot regressions.

On Mar 15, 2013, at 7:57, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Daniel, David, > > Is there any way of disabling some individual tests on specific architectures? > > Zero cost exception handling on ARM is known to be broken and there isn't anyone I know working on it with high priority, so it's likely to be that way for a long time. > > For that

This sounds like a necessary sanity check for raising teen-agers. Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 Brian Brunner brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com (610)796-5838 >>> BillsCentOS at triad.rr.com 11/07/05 04:23PM >>> Folks, If the reward is nothing more than the egotistical satisfaction of telling that SOB where to get off let the damn issue

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Frank Thommen wrote: > Hello, > > does it in any respect (throughput/performance, cpu load, I/O load, > resilience, ...) matter, if one mounts subdirectories of an NFS (v3) export > into separate directories or if one just mounts the parent directory? > > I.e. like this: > > server: /export/base/a -> /mnt/a > server: /export/base/b ->

Dear all, I'm sitting here just in front of my new PC@work and wonder about the following question: * How can I adress multiple CPUs (cores) out of R to speed up the simulations I run? * What are the prerequisites to do so? Maybe anyone could give me a hint where to start reading? Regards, Thomas P.S.: I searched the R-archive to find an answer but did find none.

Is this better off in the bugtracker? ****Summary:**** Allow windows to be shrunken to 'mindows' individually and have a mixed environment of scaled and full sized windows. Mindows would grow to full size on mouseover rather than being interacted with while small and would be re-positionable. I'd love to have the time and ability to contribute more to this idea, but I can't see

Can you sum a few columns at a time? I tried x =Calc.find(:all, :select => "sum(amt1) amt1, sum(amt2) amt2" :conditions => ["where date > ?", date] ) The sql seems to function properly, but I wasn''t able to grab the values. These just failed x.amt1 x.send("amt1") I tried changing up the query to use sum(amt1) as amt1 sum(amt1)

Hello, does it in any respect (throughput/performance, cpu load, I/O load, resilience, ...) matter, if one mounts subdirectories of an NFS (v3) export into separate directories or if one just mounts the parent directory? I.e. like this: server:/export/base/a -> /mnt/a server:/export/base/b -> /mnt/b server:/export/base/c -> /mnt/c server:/export/base/d -> /mnt/d

Hi All, I have some data from which I set four points to be breaks. Based on these points, I cut the dataset into four groups and assign a number to it: <=331.04 assign 0 >331.04 <=476.07 assign data-331.04/(476.07-331.04) >476.07<=608.66 assign 1 >608.66 <=791.5 assign 791.5- data/(791.5-608.66) > 791.5 and NA assign 0 Breaks 331.04 476.07

Hi, would like to use LLVM as backend for a compiler. One of the features I would like to implement is segment based addressing for position independent data. For some it may sound strange, for others the opposite. No need to write complex story. Imagine you have a custom alocator that manages an area of 1GB of memory. Your application uses a custom allocator to allocate memory inside this area,

There is a slight performance related reason for exporting disk partitions individually, the performance boost is server-side as Paul says. The advantage is that the no_subtree_check can be used without any additional security risk. It is probably the case that the /export/base/a is a partition, is exported with no_subtree_check, and therefore there is a small performance boost. Preventing

Thanks again for your help! > >> > >> Probably fairly minimal in most cases (on x86). On ARM there is > >> definitely a cost. > >> > > hm... why? You cannot have indexed addressing? > What I need is a way to force > The code that needs to be emitted is roughly: > [..."segment"-offset into x1...] > mrs x0, tpidr_el0 >

Here''s my issue: running ruby -I test test/unit/something_test.rb for each of my unit tests works perfectly. However, running rake test:units brings errors in all of them - some object becomes nil for some reason. Why might this be happening? Specifics: the object that is successfully not nil when I run the unit tests one-by-one but becomes nil when I do rake test:units is defined like

Folks, I *suggest* that little or no reply to this is warranted. It's just the statements of an old fart trying to make a (slightly) better environment for all of us. These thoughts are offered for consideration and use as you see fit. For some, "Hey, that'll work for me too" is the hoped for result. No discussion is intended or warranted, IMO. If you recognize yourself in