similar to: more errors (behavior)

Dear R experts: this is probably correct behavior, but I do want to point out that it is unexpected to someone not too well versed: > test=factor("A","B","C","A") > ifelse(test=="A", as.factor("A"), test) [1] 1 2 3 1 ok, my factor was just coerced into integers, even though I have a logical vector as my condition and factors as

## the following is a dream: add some sugar syntax to allow for contracts with teeth (in and out checking) > is.positive <- function(x) (all(x>0)) > exponentiate <- function( x ::is.data.frame , exponent ::is.numeric is.positive) :: is.vector is.numeric { x$base :: is.positive ## error also if base does not exist in x; may need some special IQ x$base^exponent }

I am using a variant of stopifnot a lot. can I suggest that base R extends its functionality? I know how to do this for myself. this is a suggestion for beginners and students. I don't think it would break anything. first, I think it would be more useful if it had an optional character string, so users could write stopifnot( is.matrix(m), "m is not a matrix" ) this would

Dear R-Help group: I have been tinkering with how I want my personal standard library functions to look like. They are not designed to be professional and heavyweight, but lightweight. There are probably dozens of little bugs, because I don't know or have not properly taken care of a variety of internal R code issues. still, I like how this ended up, and there is no learning curve, so I

curiosity---given that vector operations are so much faster than scalar operations, would it make sense to make uniroot vectorized? if I read the uniroot docs correctly, uniroot() calls an external C routine which seems to be a scalar function. that must be slow. I am thinking a vectorized version would be useful for an example such as of <- function(x,a) ( log(x)+x+a ) uniroot( of, c(

first, apologies for so many posts yesterday and today. I am wrestling with nls() and nls2(). I have tried to whittle it down to a simple example that still has my problem, yet can be cut-and-pasted into R. here it is: library(nls2) options(digits=12); y= c(0.4334,0.3200,0.5848,0.6214,0.3890,0.5233,0.4753,0.2104,0.3240,0.2827,0.3847,0.5571,0.5432,0.1326,0.3481) x=

Dear R wizards: is there a clean way to assign to elements in a list? what I would like to do, in pseudo R+perl notation is f <- function(a,b) list(a+b,a-b) (c,d) <- f(1,2) and have c be assigned 1+2 and d be assigned 1-2. right now, I use the clunky x <- f(1,2) c <- x[[1]] d <- x[[2]] rm(x) which seems awful. is there a nicer syntax? regards, /iaw ---- Ivo Welch

dear R experts---now I have a case where I want to estimate very large regression models with many fixed effects---not just the mean type, but cross-fixed effects---years, months, locations, firms. Many millions of observations, a few thousand variables (most of these variables are interaction fixed effects). could someone please point me to packages, if any, that would help me estimate such

Dear R experts--- Has anyone written parallel versions of "by" (i.e., mcby) and "ave" (i.e. mcave) ? I did ask a question like this a year ago, and then the answer was no. for those who are googling the group for the answer to this question, in the meantime, the poor man's version of "by" is mclapply( split( ds, factor ), FUN ) I don't know the poor

I sent this privately to ivo welch yesterday, and he thinks it might be useful to someone else as well. Since I'm on a Mac the screen device is quartz(): > quartz() > plot( c(0,1), c(0,1) ); > text( 0.5, 0.5, "\u2113" ) # and then File/Save As/ -- David. Begin forwarded message: > From: David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> > Date: August 17,

dear R experts---I am using the coef() function to pick off the coefficients from an lm() object. alas, I also need the standard errors and I need them fast. I know I can do a "summary()" on the object and pick them off this way, but this computes other stuff I do not need. Or, I can compute (X' X)^(-1) s^2 myself. Has someone written a fast se() function? incidentally, I think

this is not an important question, but I wonder why lm returns an error, and whether this can be shut off. it would seem to me that returning NA's would make more sense in some cases---after all, the problem is clearly that coefficients cannot be computed. I know that I can trap the lm.fit() error---although I have always found this to be quite inconvenient---and this is easy if I have only

Dear R Wizards---is it possible to get R to show its current call stack (sys.calls()) upon an error abort? I don't use ESS for execution, and it is often not obvious how to locate how I triggered an error in an R internal function. Seeing the call stack would make this easier. (right now, I sprinkle "cat" statements everywhere, just to locate the line where the error appears.) Of

Dear R experts--- after many years, I am planning to give in and write my first R package. I want to combine my collection of collected useful utility routines. as my guide, I am planning to use Friedrich Leisch's "Creating R Packages: A Tutorial" from Sep 2009. Is there a newer or better tutorial? this one is 4 years old. I also plan on one change---given that the

I have a set of functions that I always load on startup. for example, there is my now infamous "is.defined()" function. I would like to add some documentation for these functions, so that I can do a ?is.defined inside R. The documentation tells me how to mark up Rd files is very good, but I wonder how one installs them for access by the R executable (on OSX for me). Do I drop

Dear R experts: I searched cran (and r-help) for "nash equilibrium" and "game" but nothing stuck out. has someone written a numerical nash optimizer for two players? player a has choices x1,x2,x3,... and cares about (maximizes) pa(x1,x2,x3,...,y1,y2,y3) player b has choices y1,y2,y3,..., and cares about (maximizes) pb(x1,x2,x3,...,y1,y2,y3) I can tune it to my problem, but

dear R experts---quick question. I need to estimate a model that looks like y = (b*T+d*T^3) + (1-b-3*d*T^2)*x + (3*d*T)*x^2 + (-d)*x^3 I only have three parameters. Is nls() the right tool for the job, or is there something faster/better? /iaw ---- Ivo Welch (ivo.welch@brown.edu, ivo.welch@gmail.com) [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

dear R experts---is there a function that prints a data frame to a string? cat() cannot handle lists, so I cannot write cat("your data frame is:\n", df, "\n"). regards, /iaw ---- Ivo Welch (ivo.welch@gmail.com) [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

quick programming questions. I want to "turn on" more errors. there are two traps I occasionally fall into. * I wonder why R thinks that a variable is always defined in a data frame. > is.defined(d) [1] FALSE > d= data.frame( x=1:5, y=1:5 ) > is.defined(d$z) [1] TRUE > is.defined(nonexisting$garbage) [1] TRUE this is a bit unfortunate

The treatment of dates seems to be a little inconsistent in R 2.11.1 (2010-05-31): [1] The choice of origins? > as.integer(as.Date("1970-01-01")) works and assumes as origin 1970-01-01. However, > as.Date(1) does not work. It requires an origin (as.Date(1, origin="1970-01-01")). If we set a default origin in the former, it should probably work when the input