similar to: 'Political' Questions on CentOS please

I may not agree with everything they say, such as ISPConfig (I prefer webmin) but this tutorial offers a "step by step opportunity for newbies". Does this indicate that CentOS is now a "mainstream" distro? (Technically speaking its not CentOS 4.3 but CentOS 4 Update 3 but we are not into semantics). Article on Slash :- http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/06/05/01/1049254.shtml

I want to replicate between two Solaris hosts. The source is Solaris 2.6 and the target is Solaris 2.8. Using rsh, the basic program seems fine (not running in daemon mode), but I have a problem. The directory tree is about 150,000 files, with about 5 gb of data. I tar'd the directory and moved it to the other side, but when I run an rsync against that directory, it still wants to move

In the hypothetical example below, how do I add two segments() into the two panels, respectively? Say segments(x0=5, y0=10, x1=5, y1=20) on the left and segments(x0=15, y0=-10, x1=15, y1=-2) on the right? Many thanks in advance, Yuelin Li. ps. part of the code came from a solution given by Deepayan Sarkar. ------------------- library(lattice) set.seed(12345) x <- 0:20 y.male.obs <- - 1.2

R-helpers, I recently submitted a help request for the predict.drm function found in the drc package. I am still having issues with the function and I am submitting reproducible code hoping that somebody can help me figure out what is going on. -------- library(drc) # Fit a 4 parameter logistic model to ryegrass dataset fit <- drm(rootl ~ conc, data = ryegrass, fct = LL.4()) summary(fit) #

Hi all, At some point recently my customers can no longer see GPFS snapshots under the Windows Previous Versions tab. It simply says "No previous versions available". If a fileset is exported with the flag "force user = root" then Previous Versions *are* displayed. [2016/07/06 10:07:35.602080, 3] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1322(check_reduced_name) check_reduced_name:

Here I am again with question I'll feel foolish for asking, when I see the answer. I'm trying to produce a report and here's where I get stuck: How do I get R2HTML to produce the same number format? Particularly remove the decimal places for Par and Sal. Are there better methods to produce this type of report? Thanks, L.A. R version 2.10.0 XP

> On Jun 18, 2017, at 6:24 AM, Manoranjan Muthusamy <ranjanmano167 at gmail.com> wrote: > > I am using nlsLM {minpack.lm} to find the values of parameters a and b of > function myfun which give the best fit for the data set, mydata. > > mydata=data.frame(x=c(0,5,9,13,17,20),y = c(0,11,20,29,38,45)) > > myfun=function(a,b,r,t){ > prd=a*b*(1-exp(-b*r*t)) >

I ran the following script. I satisfied the constraint by making a*b a single parameter, which isn't always possible. I also ran nlxb() from nlsr package, and this gives singular values of the Jacobian. In the unconstrained case, the svs are pretty awful, and I wouldn't trust the results as a model, though the minimum is probably OK. The constrained result has a much larger sum of squares.

Gracias Emilio y Jorge. Tengo que explicarlo mejor. Mostrando a una audiencia cómo hacer un tipo de análisis, se hace un loop (abajo) que analiza un mapa por regiones longitudinales. Tal y como está el script, print(i) te indica la longitud por la que va (de 10º en 10º) pero me gustaría que en vez de eso te fuese representando una línea vertical sobre el mapa, que he representado previamente con

Hi, Could you help me to install the rgl package on Solaris 10 x86? I tried and got the following error messages. When I compiled my R as 64bit, I used the SUN ProW compilers. However, gcc seems to being used below as well as missing some information. Thank you in advance, Dongseok > install.packages("rgl") --- Please select a CRAN mirror for use in this session --- *

I am using nlsLM {minpack.lm} to find the values of parameters a and b of function myfun which give the best fit for the data set, mydata. mydata=data.frame(x=c(0,5,9,13,17,20),y = c(0,11,20,29,38,45)) myfun=function(a,b,r,t){ prd=a*b*(1-exp(-b*r*t)) return(prd)} and using nlsLM myfit=nlsLM(y~myfun(a,b,r=2,t=x),data=mydata,start=list(a=2000,b=0.05), lower = c(1000,0),

https://cran.r-project.org/web/views/Optimization.html (Cran's optimization task view -- as always, you should search before posting) In general, nonlinear optimization with nonlinear constraints is hard, and the strategy used here (multiplying by a*b < 1000) may not work -- it introduces a discontinuity into the objective function, so gradient based methods may in particular be

I'm using xYplot to create a bubble plot of values that I'd like to visualize on top of a filled-in map of the coast, but I'm too much of a lattice (which I understand xYplot is built on) and mapping newbie to figure out how to begin to make this happen. Below is some sample code that doesn't work but illustrates my goal. Any pointers anyone has would be much appreciated.

I am not as expert as John, but I thought it worth pointing out that the variable substitution technique gives up one set of constraints for another (b=0 in this case). I also find that plots help me see what is going on, so here is my reproducible example (note inclusion of library calls for completeness). Note that NONE of the optimizers mentioned so far appear to be finding the true best

I've seen a number of problems like this over the years. The fact that the singular values of the Jacobian have a ration larger than the usual convergence tolerances can mean the codes stop well before the best fit. That is the "numerical analyst" view. David and Jeff have given geometric and statistical arguments. All views are useful, but it takes some time to sort them all out and

fit lwr upr 1 218.4332 90.51019 346.3561 2 218.3906 90.46133 346.3198 3 218.3906 90.46133 346.3198 4 161.3982 44.85702 277.9394 5 192.4450 68.39903 316.4909 6 179.8056 56.49540 303.1158 7 219.5406 91.52707 347.5542 8 162.6761 46.65760 278.6945 9 193.8506 70.59838 317.1029 10 181.3816 58.11305 304.6502 11 221.2871 92.14366 350.4305 12 164.2947 47.91081 280.6785 13

Hello, I would like to set a specify default gateway for my VMs. However I’m not succeeding Here after is the isolated lan, where I added the statement <route address='10.0.0.0' prefix='8' gateway='10.10.0.7’/> where my aim is to route to the 10.10.0.7 What should I do , to make it works ? Thanks <network> <name>prd-private-lan</name>

I can't get my simultaneous equations to work using system fit. Please help. #Reproducible script Empdata<- read.csv("/Users/ngwinuiazenui/Documents/UPLOADemp.csv") View(Empdata) str(Empdata) Empdata$gnipc<-as.numeric(Empdata$gnipc) install.packages("systemfit") library("systemfit") pdata <- plm.data(Empdata,

No Jeremy, excuse me, the error was in my email. The correct command is /bin/echo "Channel: Local/$1@chiamamezzi-dialout";\ /bin/echo "Variable: callid=123456|number=$1|url=pippo|menuid=FOP|redirectnum=0554202880";\ /bin/echo "Context: chiamamezzi-Wave";\ /bin/echo "Exten: s";\ /bin/echo "Priority: 1";\ /bin/echo "Callerid: Asterisk Automatic

Hi, We are facing a problem on AIX 5.3 (latest patch) where the following behavior happens. Reproduced with versions of samba from 3.0.23 to 3.0.26a. # Normal behavior : # id and id username should return the same info # root@srv1:/# id uid=0(root) gid=0(system) groups=2(bin),3(sys),7(security),8(cron),10(audit),11(lp) root@srv1:/# id root uid=0(root) gid=0(system)