similar to: nomianl response model

Dear all, I have just sent an email with my problem, but I think no one can see the red part, beacuse it is black. So, i am writing again the codes: rm(list=ls()) #remove almost everything in the memory set.seed(180185) nsim <- 10 mresultx <- matrix(-99, nrow=1000, ncol=nsim) mresultb <- matrix(-99, nrow=1000, ncol=nsim) N <- 200 I <- 5 taus <- c(0.480:0.520) h <-

Dear all, I am trying to run a loop in my codes, but the software returns an error: "subscript out of bounds" I dont understand exactly why this is happenning. My codes are the following: rm(list=ls()) #remove almost everything in the memory set.seed(180185) nsim <- 10 mresultx <- matrix(-99, nrow=1000, ncol=nsim) mresultb <- matrix(-99, nrow=1000, ncol=nsim) N

Dear all, I am a new user in r and I am facing some problems with the quantile regression specification. I have two matrix (mresultb and mresultx) with nrow=1000 and ncol=nsim, where I specify (let's say) nsim=10. Hence, the columns in my matrix represents each simulation of a determined variable. I need to regress each column of mresultb on mresultx. My codes are the following:

Hi, I've looked all over for a solution to this, but haven't had much look in specifying what I want to do with appropriate search terms. Thus I'm turning to R-help. In the process of trying to write a simple function to rename individual column names in a data frame, I ran into the following problem: When I rename the columns within my function, I can't seem to get it to

> -----Original Message----- > From: William Dunlap > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 9:16 AM > To: 'johannes_graumann at web.de' > Subject: Re: [R] Efficient passing through big data.frame and > modifying select fields > > > Johannes Graumann johannes_graumann at web.de > > Tue Nov 25 15:16:01 CET 2008 > > > > Hi all, > > > >

Hi all i have an interesting project that i have been working on. i intended to set this as a first year programming problem but then changed my mind since i thought that it might be too difficult for them to program. the problem is as follows: You have been approached by a local casino in order to investigate the performance of one of their slot machines. The slot machine

## Package Needed library(fields) ## Assumptions set.seed(123) nsim<-5 p<-2 ## Generate Random Matrix G G <- matrix(runif(p*nsim),nsim,p) ## Set Empty Matraces dmax and dmin dmax<- matrix(data=NA,nrow=nsim,ncol=p) dmin<- matrix(data=NA,nrow=nsim,ncol=p) ## Loop to Fill dmax and dmin for(i in 1:nsim) { dmax[i]<- max(rdist(G[i,,drop=FALSE],G)) dmin[i]<-

I?m working on an R-implementation of the simulation-based finite-sample null-distribution of (R)LR-Test in Mixed Models (i.e. testing for Var(RandomEffect)=0) derived by C. M. Crainiceanu and D. Ruppert. I'm in the beginning stages of this project and while comparing quick and dirty grid-search-methods and more exact optim()/optimize()-based methods to find the maximum of a part of the

Hi R-users, I have a problem for updating the estimates of correlation coefficient in simulation loop. I want to get the matrix of correlation coefficients (matrix, name: est) from geese by using loop(500 times) . I used following code to update, nsim<-500 est<-matrix(ncol=2, nrow=nsim) for(i in 1:nsim){ fit <- geese(x ~ trt, id=subject, data=data_gee, family=binomial,

Hi, In the following function, i hope to save my simulated data into the "result" dataset, but why the final "result" dataset seems not to be generated. #Function simdata<-function (nsim) { result<-matrix(NA,nrow=nsim,ncol=2) colnames(result)<-c("x","y") for (i in 1:nsim) { set.seed(i) result[i,]<- cbind(runif(1),runif(1)) }

I've written the function below to simulate the mean 1st through nth nearest neighbor distances for a random spatial pattern using the functions nndist() and runifpoint() from spatsat. It works, but runs relatively slowly - would appreciate suggestions on how to speed up this function. Thanks. --Dale library(spatstat) sim.nth.mdist <- function(nth,nsim) { D <- matrix(ncol=nth,

Craig, Thanks for your follow-up note on using the asypow package. My problem was not only constructing the "constraints" vector but, for my particular situation (Poisson regression, two groups, sample sizes of (1081,3180), I get very different results using asypow package compared to my other (home grown) approaches. library(asypow) pois.mean<-c(0.0065,0.0003) info.pois <-

I have the following situation I want to analyse with prcomp. Each subject has a curve called the contrast sensitivity function (CSF). This curve's overall shape is due to the additive output of 3 "channels" (eigenvectors). #this shows 3 SF channels; net CSF = c1 + c2+c3 x<-1:100 c1<-dnorm(x,mean=20,sd=20) c2<-dnorm(x,mean=50,sd=20) c3<-dnorm(x,mean=80,sd=20)

Hello! I have a matrix with data and a column indicating whether it is censored or not. Is there a way to apply weibull and exponential maximum likelihood estimation directly on the censored data, like in the paper: Backtesting Value-at-Risk: A Duration-Based Approach, P Chrisoffersen and D Pelletier (October 2003) page 8? The problem is that if I type out the code as below the likelihood

I am trying to run the following function (a hierarchical bayes linear model) and receive the error in solve.default. The function was originally written for an older version of SPlus. Can anyone give me some insights into where the problem is? Thanks R 2.4.1 on MAC OSX 2mb ram Mark Grant markg at uic.edu > attach(Aspirin.frame) > hblm(Diff ~ 1, s = SE) Error in solve.default(R, rinv)

Hi all, I have relatively big data frames (> 10000 rows by 80 columns) that need to be exposed to "merge". Works marvelously well in general, but some fields of the data frames actually contain multiple ";"-separated values encoded as a character string without defined order, which makes the fields not match each other. Example: > frame1[1,1] [1] "some;thing"

Hello Everyone, I am trying to excess the inbuit .Fortran and .C codes of R. Can any one help me in that. For example in kmeans clustering the algorithms are written in .Fortran I want to access them and see the .Fortran syntax of the codes. Can any one help me how can I do that? Thanx, Nitin Kumar On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:00 PM, <r-help-request@r-project.org> wrote: > Send R-help

Hi I am attempting to use the lattice bwplot function to generate boxplots of numerous parameters (1-panel/parameter) by site (x-axis). The parameters have quite different ranges of values, so it would be best to have a separate y-axis range for each panel. Below is a basic example of what I am trying to do. As is seen, the y-axes need to be scaled individually to make this useful. Any

Hello! I have a data frame with dates. I need to create a new "month" that starts on the 20th of each month - because I'll need to aggregate my data later by that "shifted" month. I wrote the code below and it works. However, I was wondering if there is some ready-made function in some package - that makes it easier/more elegant? Thanks a lot! # Example data:

Dear All, I have been trying to simulate data from a fitted glm using the simulate() function (version details at the bottom). This works for lm() fits and even for lmer() fits (in lme4). However, for glm() fits its output does not make sense to me -- am I missing something or is this a bug? Consider the following count data, modelled as gaussian, poisson and binomial responses: counts