similar to: ANOVA subject-wise means

Dear list, i have a quick and (hopefully) straightforward question regarding the plot-function after running aov. if i plot an equation like this: plot(dataSubjects~factorA, data=mydata) R gives me the boxplots for this particular factor A. my model, however contains several factors. is there a straightforward way to plot barplots for a specific factor with the constraint that those values

dear list, i am using a multifactorial design with two treatments (factor A: drugs, three levels; factor B: theraphy, two levels) and a time factor (three levels, different timepoint). hypothetically, i measured the same subjects for all treatements and timepoints, so its a repeated measurement design. now i ran an anova in R and also some Tukey post-hoc tests using glht. but what i am actually

Hi list, I have a question regarding post-hoc extraction of data from a two-way categorical anova. I have a categorical anova of this form: width ~ steepness + patchiness (4 steepness levels, 4 patchiness levels) This simple setup answers if for the widths I collected across different levels of steepness and patchiness significant differences can be found. Is there a way to look at these

I am trying to plot a graph but the points on the graph should be different symbols and colors. It should represent what is in the legend. I tried using the points command but this does not work. Is there another command in R that would allow me to use different symbols and colors for the points? Thank you kindly. data(mtcars) plot(mtcars$wt,mtcars$mpg,xlab= "Weight(lbs/1000)",

Hi, I would like to make a suggestion for a small syntactic modification of FUN argument in the family of functions [lsv]apply(). The idea is to allow one-liner expressions without typing "function(item) {...}" to surround them. The argument to the anonymous function is simply referred as ".". Let take an example. With this new feature, the following call

I'm sure this exists elsewhere, but, as a trade-off, could you achieve what you want with a separate helper function F(expr) that constructs the function you want to pass to [lsv]apply()? Something that would allow you to write: sapply(split(mtcars, mtcars$cyl), F(summary(lm(mpg ~ wt,.))$r.squared)) Such an F() function would apply elsewhere too. /Henrik On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:30 AM

Dear all, Consider the model below: > x <- lm(mpg ~ cyl * disp * hp * drat, mtcars) > summary(x) Call: lm(formula = mpg ~ cyl * disp * hp * drat, data = mtcars) Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -3.5725 -0.6603 0.0108 1.1017 2.6956 Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 1.070e+03 3.856e+02 2.776 0.01350 * cyl

Hi, I am using levelplot, and would like remove from each panel (condition) its unused x levels. e.g. Remove from panel vs=1 the cyl level=8. data(mtcars) levelplot(mpg~factor(cyl)*factor(gear)|factor(vs)) Thanks for your help, Ronny -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Lattice-levelplot-remove-unused-levels-per-panel-tp4656087.html Sent from the R help mailing

Dear List I have math test scores for male and female students where gender is a dummy code (female =1). I also have a variety of other demographic variables. However to begin, I want to create a very simple stripchart where female math scores are a blue circle and male scores are a red triangle. I am having difficulty using conditional statements to accomplish this. Thank you. ------

Thanks Simon, Now, I see better your argument. Le 16/04/2020 ? 22:48, Simon Urbanek a ?crit?: > ... I'm not arguing against the principle, I'm arguing about your > particular proposal as it is inconsistent and not general. This sounds promising for me. May be in a (new?) future, R core will come with a correct proposal for this principle? Meanwhile, to avoid substitute(),

Dear Sirs, I am Professor at Indira Gandhi Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India. While taking classes, I found the *by() *function producing following error when I use FUN=mean or median and some other functions, however, FUN=summary works. Given below is the output of the example I used on a built-in dataset "mtcars", along with error message reproduced herewith: >

dear list, i am running a within-design ANOVA with 4 factors (4,4,2 and 2 levels each). the last one is a time factor comprising two different treatment timepoints. i fit a mixed-effects model using lme and apply the anova function to the outcome. according to this analysis, there are highly significant main effect on the first and the time factor. i then checked the boxplots for the two 4-level

Simon, Thanks for replying. In what follows I won't try to argue (I understood that you find this a bad idea) but I would like to make clearer some of your point for me (and may be for others). Le 16/04/2020 ? 16:48, Simon Urbanek a ?crit?: > Serguei, >> On 17/04/2020, at 2:24 AM, Sokol Serguei <sokol at insa-toulouse.fr> >> wrote: Hi, I would like to make a

Dear all I'm unable to find an example of extracting the rotated scores of a principal components analysis. I can do this easily for the un-rotated version. data(mtcars) .PC <- princomp(~am+carb+cyl+disp+drat+gear+hp+mpg, cor=TRUE, data=mtcars) unclass(loadings(.PC)) # component loadings summary(.PC) # proportions of variance mtcars$PC1 <- .PC$scores[,1] # extract un-rotated scores of

> lm2 <- function(...) lm(...) > lm2(mpg ~ wt, data=mtcars) Call: lm(formula = ..1, data = ..2) Coefficients: (Intercept) wt 37.285 -5.344 > lm2(mpg ~ wt, weights=cyl, data=mtcars) Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : ..2 used in an incorrect context, no ... to look in Can anyone explain why this is happening? (Obviously this is a manufactured example, but it

Dear list, I want the 1st, 2nd, 5th, and 6th columns of mtcars. After copying them, the columns become numeric class rather than data frame. But, when I copy rows, they data frame retains its class. Why is this? I don't see why copying rows vs columns is so different. > class(mtcars) [1] "data.frame" > head(mtcars) mpg cyl disp hp drat wt qsec vs

Hi everyone, I've run into a bit of strange problem with implicit vs explicit printing and the call stack. I've included an example at the bottom of this email. The basic problem is that I have an S3 object with a print method. When the object is implicitly printed (ie. typed directly into the console) the function arguments in the call stack are exploded out to their actual values,

Dear All, Thanks for your help. However, I would like to draw your attention to the following: Actually, I was replicating the Example 2.3, using the dataset "brainsize.txt" given in Section 2.3.3 ("Summarize by group") at page 55, of a famous book "R by Example" written by "Jim Albert and Maria Rizzo" published in Springers (2012) in a Use R! Series. The

I think you are not using the best function for what your intentions are. Try: > by(data=mtcars, INDICES=list(as.factor(mtcars$am)), FUN=colMeans) : 0 mpg cyl disp hp drat wt qsec vs 17.1473684 6.9473684 290.3789474 160.2631579 3.2863158 3.7688947 18.1831579 0.3684211 am gear carb 0.0000000

Buen día estimados Estoy tratando de hacer un tibble con los resultados de un apply que se muestran en la consola que me da R, no estoy seguro si eso se pueda hacer, pero me gustaría organizar los resultados de esa manera. mi código es: data("mtcars") Mtcars_matriz <- as.matrix(mtcars) apply(Mtcars_matriz, MARGIN =2, FUN = shapiro.test) DF2 <- tibble(Variable = NA, W = NA, Pvalue =