similar to: fitting model to resampled data

Thanks to the help of people from this forum I was able to bootstrap my data and then apply a model to it. Thanks for all your help. Everything worked out well, but I am having a difficult time getting the new parameter values. I bootstrapped the data 300 times and I want to get the 300 sets of parameter estimates and plot them in Excel. Here is my code:

I am trying to compare Vbert growth curves from several years of fish data. I am following the code provided by: http://www.ncfaculty.net/dogle/fishR/gnrlex/VonBertalanffy/VonBertalanffy.pdf. Specifically the section on VBGM Comparisons between groups. ? This code is pretty cut and dry. I am able to run it perfectly with the "fake" data that is provided. But when I run it with my own

Hi, I have great problems with my work in R. I look for to model the growth of fish. I have "Longitudinal data", a serie of repeated measures for each individual. Using the corresponding packages "nlme" in R. I treat to fit to the data different growth functions, wich were entered by me. Unfortunately for no it was arrived at the convergence, several error messages appeared. I

All - I have data: TL age 388 4 418 4 438 4 428 5 539 10 432 4 444 7 421 4 438 4 419 4 463 6 423 4 ... [truncated] and I'm trying to fit a simple Von Bertalanffy growth curve with program: #Creates a Von Bertalanffy growth model VonB=nls(TL~Linf*(1-exp(-k*(age-t0))), data=box5.4, start=list(Linf=1000, k=0.1, t0=0.1), trace=TRUE) #Scatterplot of the data plot(TL~age, data=box5.4,

Dear colleagues, Von Bertalanffy model is commonly adjust to data on fish length (TL) and age (AGE) TL= Linf*(1-exp(-K*(AGE-t0)). Linf, K and t0 are parameters of the model. One main goal of the growth study is the comparison of growth parameter estimates between sexes of the same species, or estimates from different populations. The realibility statistical tests normally applied are highly

I am trying to get R to resample my dataset of two columns of age and length data for fish. I got it to work, but it is not resampling every replicate. Instead, it resamples my data once and then repeated it 5 times. Here is my dataset of 9 fish samples with an age and length for each one: Age Length 2 200 5 450 6 600 7 702 8 798 5 453 4 399 1 120 2 202 Here is my code which resamples my

Dear R-list members, Some months ago I wrote a message on the usage of gnls (nlme library) and here I come again. Let me give an example: I have a 10 year length-at-age data set of 10 fishes (see growth.dat at the end of this message) and I want to fit a von Bertalanffy growth model, Li= Linf*(1-exp(-k*(ti-t0))) where Li = length at age i, Linf= asymptotic length, k= curvature parameter, ti=

Howdy, Last week I got some great help on why I was getting an error code when trying to run this model, thanks everyone!  I was able to get the code up and running beautifully for several data sets.  Now I am getting different errors with this new data set.  I can't figure out why, I have more data points with this species, and it is ordered exactly the same as the other species I have been

I have data that looks like O.lengthO.age 176 1 179 1 182 1 ... 493 5 494 5 514 5 606 5 462 6 491 6 537 6 553 6 432 7 522 7 625 8 661 8 687 10 704 10 615 12 (truncated) with a simple VonB growth model from within nls(): plot(O.length~O.age, data=OS) Oto = nls(O.length~Linf*(1-exp(-k*(O.age-t0))), data=OS, start=list(Linf=1000, k=0.1, t0=0.1), trace=TRUE) mod <- seq(0, 12)

Dear R-list members, Cynthia M. Jones wrote a paper (Fitting growth curves to retrospective size-at-age data, Fisheries Research 46(2000):123-129; abstract at http://www.elsevier.nl/gej-ng/10/19/44/70/24/37/abstract.html)where the SAS procedure MIXED, Macro NLINMIX (Littell et. al., 1996)was used to estimate the von Bertalanffy growth function parameters assuming that data from the same fish are

Thanks to the people on this list I was able to fix my code for randomly sampling. Thanks. Now, I am moving on to the next step and I ran into another snag. I have a large dataset but I am starting with a small made-up dataset until I figure it out. I have two columns of data (age and length). I got R to read my data called growth which is the age and length for 10 fish: >

I have R randomly sampling my array made up of 2 columns of data. Here is my code randomly sampling 5 different rows from my dataset to create a new dataset of 8 rows of data: testdat<-growth[sample(5,8,replace=T),] Now I want to tell R to repeat this function 50 times and give me the output. I have been searching the internet and have been unable to figure this out. Any advice

Hello, I am attempting to fit a non-linear model (Von Bertalanffy growth model) to fish length-at-age data with the purpose of determining if any of the three parameters differ between male and female fish. I believe that I can successfully accomplish this goal assuming an additive error structure (illustrated in section 1 below). My trouble begins when I attempt this analysis using a model

Hi, I' m having a hard time understanding the computation of degrees of freedom when runing nlme() on the following model: > formula(my data.gd) dLt ~ Lt | ID TasavB<- function(Lt, Linf, K) (K*(Linf-Lt)) my model.nlme <- nlme (dLt ~ TasavB(Lt, Linf, K), data = my data.gd, fixed = list(Linf ~ 1, K ~ 1), start = list(fixed = c(70, 0.4)), na.action= na.include,

Hi there, I'm a PhD student investigating growth patterns in fish. I've been using the minpack.lm package to fit extended von Bertalanffy growth models that include explanatory covariates (temperature and density). I found the nls.lm comand a powerful tool to fit models with a lot of parameters. However, in order to select the best model over the possible candidates (without covariates,

I'm fitting nonlinear functions to some growth data but I'm getting radically different results in R to another program (Prism). Furthermore the values from the other program give a better fit and seem more realistic. I think there is a problem with the results from the r nls function. The differences only occur with weighted data so I think I'm making a mistake in the weighting.

Dear All., I've created R-code for which a user will be asked to choose between 2 analyses. I've written one function for each type of analysis. Within each function, the users is prompted to enter information. An example is: cat("Enter value for lower Linf :\n") L1<-scan(n=1) cat("Enter value for upper Linf :\n") L2<-scan(n=1)

Hi In a dataset I have length and age for cod. The age, however, is ony given for 40-100% of the fish. What I need to do is to fill inn the NAs in a correct way, so that age has a value for each length. This is to be done for each sample seperately (there are 324 samples), meaning the NAs for sampleno 1 shall be calculated from the known values from sampleno 1. As for example length 55 cm

I'm tyring to fit a relatively simple nls model to some data, but keep coming up against the same error (code follows): Oto=nls(Otolith ~ Linf*(1-exp(-k(AGE-to))), data = ages, start = list(Linf=1000, k=0.1, to=0.1), trace = TRUE) The error message I keep getting is "Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : could not find function "k"". I've used this

R-help, I'm trying to estimate some parameters using the Maximum Likehood method. The model describes fish growth using a sigmoidal-type of curve: fn_w <- function(params) { Winf <- params[1] k <- params[2] t0 <- params[3] b <- params[4] sigma <- params[5] what <- Winf * (1-exp(- k *(tt - t0)))^b