similar to: confirming behavior of "by"

Hi, When adding an index to another one using add_indexes I get duplicates even though I use the :key attribute. For example: def test_add_indexes_uniqueness index1 = Ferret::Index::Index.new(:key => :id) index2 = Ferret::Index::Index.new(:key => :id) # Add two items with same id index1 << {:id => 23, :data => "This is the data..."}

Dear List, Let's say I have a list whose components are 2 matrices (as exemplified in the "mylist" object below). I'd like to create a list with components being 4 matrices based on an logical index vector. is there a way to simplify what I'm doing to obtain the results in "mylist2"? I'd like something that would work on an arbitrary number of elements in

Hi, I am a Ph.D. student from Québec, Canada. I’m a beginner with R and Bioconductor. Until now the only experience I have is in analyzing microarray data using affy and limma packages. Now I am trying to analyze Rat Gene 10 st arrays and I would like to run RMA analysis and Smyth moderated t test on those arrays. Since no cdf official package is available for those arrays, after reading many

Hi everyone, I have 2 environments (2 different R sessions) as described below: Session 1: Name of the environment: "CrlmmInfo" Objects in the environment: index1: logical index - length 238304 index2: logical index - length 238304 priors: list of 4 - (matrix 6x6, 2 vectors of length 6, vector of length 2) - all num params: list of 4: centers [238304 x 3 x

Hi everyone, I have 2 environments (2 different R sessions) as described below: Session 1: Name of the environment: "CrlmmInfo" Objects in the environment: index1: logical index - length 238304 index2: logical index - length 238304 priors: list of 4 - (matrix 6x6, 2 vectors of length 6, vector of length 2) - all num params: list of 4: centers [238304 x 3 x

Hi, I'm trying to plot bar graphs with stacked columns marked with askterisks for certain columns, which follow certain criteria. I've gotten the stacked bar plots with Data set A (please refer to code below). However, I haven't figured how to put asterisks on columns based on some extra information (such as "used/unused") as in Data set B i.e. asterisks at the

Hey, Thanks for your great inputs. While "index = apply(mat == 0, MARGIN = 1, any)" gives you an idea of the rows containing zero(s), "index<-data[!apply(data==0,MARGIN=1,any),]" does the actual job of removing the rows with zeros. Kind regards Ogbos On 9 March 2010 15:12, Paul Hiemstra <p.hiemstra@geo.uu.nl> wrote: > Dimitris Rizopoulos wrote: > >>

Hi All, I have a whole lot of *.raw files in my working folder and I am doing the same analysis on each of those and want to save all the results in a single file. I am making some mistake here and can't figure out how to solve it. Say, the *.raw files are ABCD.raw, EFGH.raw, IJKL.raw ... The files are of this format ID PHI?? aa1? aa2? aa3 .... 1??? 1???? 1.3?? 2.0?? 1.0 2??? 0????

Hi Terry, On 03/16/2016 08:03 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote: > Is the phrase "index <- match(x, sort(unique(x)))" reliable, in the > sense that it will never return NA? This is assuming that match() and unique() will never disagree on equality between 2 floating point values. I believe they share some code internally (same hashing routine?), so maybe it's reliable.

Buenas, He creado dos andamios para dos tablas a la que accedo por index1 e index2 respectivamente. En cada index puedo hacer las tareas de añadir, borrar, ver lineas... pero me gustaria saber como se hace una busqueda mas compleja...es decir si tengo una tabla Productos y otra tabla descripciones y quiero mostrar en los productos con sus descripciones... he intentado en el index1 acceder a la

Hello, I would like to be able to plot an array on a plot, something like: |arg1 | arg2 | arg3 val1| 0.9 | 1.1 | 2.4 val2| 0.33 | 0.23 | -1.4 val3| hello| stop | test I know Rwave is good to report but don't want to use it. ? Is there a package that allow quick and dirty plot of dataframes like this ? Thanks a lot -- View this message in context:

Fairly straightforward code motion of MSR / TSC / PMC accessors to the sub-arch level. Note that rdmsr/wrmsr_safe functions are not moved; Linux relies on the fault behavior here in the event that certain MSRs are not supported on hardware, and combining this with a VMI wrapper is overly complicated. The instructions are virtualizable with trap and emulate, not on critical code paths, and only

Fairly straightforward code motion of MSR / TSC / PMC accessors to the sub-arch level. Note that rdmsr/wrmsr_safe functions are not moved; Linux relies on the fault behavior here in the event that certain MSRs are not supported on hardware, and combining this with a VMI wrapper is overly complicated. The instructions are virtualizable with trap and emulate, not on critical code paths, and only

Dear R helpers Suppose val1 = c(10, 20, 35, 80, 12) val2 = c(3, 8, 11, 7) I want to select either val1 or val2 depending on value of third quantity val3. val3 assumes either of the values "Monthly" or "Yearly". If val3 = "Monthly", then val = val1 and if val3 = "Yearly", then val = val2. I tried the ifelse statement as ifelse(val3 =

I am porting llvm-gcc frontend. We have ported GCC4.2 for our target. So I move *.h *.md and *.c to llvm-gcc.  I do not implement any LLVM MACRO, and use default action of llvm-gcc.  I get a new llvm-gcc for our target. But I get a bug. /******************************/ //#include <stdio.h> union MYunion {   unsigned char uc ;   int ui; } myunion; void vfu1(union MYunion  u) {     u.ui =

Hi Zsombor, Thanks for the patch! Unfortunately I can't apply it because the llvm API has moved from BinaryOperator::create to BinaryOperator::Create. Are you using svn head? Now on the x86_64 part. There has been very little work on porting vmkit on x86_64. If you're having compilation problems, I suppose it's in the garbage collector directory (GCMmap2). If you could make the

Hello, I'm trying to compile vmkit on a x86_64 linux box with gcc-4.1.2, but I'm running into troubles because of various problems with casts between pointers and integers. Is there anybody who succeeded in this task? Az I see, some of the problems can be fixed with an appropriate typedef/macro declaration, but in VMCore/JavaObject.cpp some lowlevel bitmanipulation is used, to mark

When CONFIG_PARAVIRT is enabled, the kernel is ignoring exceptions on the {rd,wr}msr instructions. This makes serious issues (either on the guest kernel, or on the host) be silently ignored, and is different from the native MSR code (which does not ignore the exceptions). As paravirt.h already includes linux/bug.h, I don't see what was the original issue preventing BUG_ON from being used.

When CONFIG_PARAVIRT is enabled, the kernel is ignoring exceptions on the {rd,wr}msr instructions. This makes serious issues (either on the guest kernel, or on the host) be silently ignored, and is different from the native MSR code (which does not ignore the exceptions). As paravirt.h already includes linux/bug.h, I don't see what was the original issue preventing BUG_ON from being used.

What is the best way to produce a barplot from my data? I would like the barplot to show each person with the values stacked val1+val2+val3, so there is one bar for each person When I use barplot(data.matrix(realdata)), it shows one bar for each value instead. To post here, I created an artificical data set, but it works fine. fakedata <- as.data.frame(list(LETTERS[1:3])) colnames(fakedata)