similar to: scientific vs. fixed notation in xyplot()

R gurus, Every so often(*) someone asks how to suppress scientific notation in printing, so I thought I'd give it a shot, but I need some help. The formatting decision is made(**) on line 286 of src/main/format.c : if (mF <= *m) { /* IFF it needs less space : "F" (Fixpoint) format */ where mF is the number of characters for "normal" printing and *m is the number

On 02/02/2010 6:20 AM, Dimitri Shvorob wrote: > Ruben Roa has kindly suggested using 'scipen' option - cf. > >> fixed notation will be preferred unless it is more than ???scipen??? digits >> wider. > > However, > > options(scipen = 50) > x = c(1e7, 2e7) > barplot(x) > > still does not produce the desired result. This is strange. I see what

I'm trying to display my deciles without scientific notation, but have not found an option that will allow me to do so. According to web searches, the options(scipen=999) should remove scientific notation, but it seems not too. Does this option work with quantcut function? Is there any other option that can be used? I am using verison 2.10.0. library(gtools) library(gdata)

The labels on the x-axis are defaulting to scientific notation no matter how small cex.axis is. How can I override scientific notation to get the labels to print out as specified? Here is the code (UNIT here is 0.0105): plot(xm,yv,log="xy",ylim=c(0.1,20)/UNIT,xlim=c(0.004,20)*UNIT,xaxt="n",t ype="n") axis(1,

Is there a better alternative to x = c(1e7, 2e7) x.lb = c(0,1e7,2e7) s.lb = format(x.lb, scientific = FALSE, big.mark = ",") barplot(x, yaxt = "n", ylab = "") axis(side = 2, at = x.lb, labels = s.lb) (I am sure there is a better alternative to line 2 :)). Thank you. -- View this message in context:

Dear List: Below is how I specify an axis: axis(2, at=c(0.00005, 0.0005)) R displays the numbers in scientific notation. What argument/parameter should I use to tell R to display the numbers as specified rather than in scientific notation? > version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major

R developers, Seems I get a bad result ("%#4.0-1e" in particular) when trying to use prettyNum digits=0 with scientific notation. I tried on both my Linux box and on an online R evaluator and saw the same problem, so it's not limited to my box at least. I see the problem in both R 3.5.3 and R 3.3.2. options(scipen=-100) prettyNum(1, digits=0) [1] "%#4.0-1e" prettyNum(2,

Sorry for asking such a simple question, but I couldn't find the answer through a search... How can I get R to show me the values of estimates *not* in scientific notation? When I use summary() after using lm() I am getting numbers like 4.485107e-01, when what I want to see is 0.4485.... Thanks, Brian

Dear R users: I assigned students to make some graphs and I'm having trouble answering some questions that they have. We are all working on R 2.1 on Fedora Core Linux 4 systems. 1. In the plot, the axis is not labeled by "numbers", but rather scientific notation like "-2e+08" or such. We realize that means -200,000,000. We want to beautify the plot. We would rather

murdoch at stats.uwo.ca wrote: > On 02/02/2010 6:20 AM, Dimitri Shvorob wrote: >> Ruben Roa has kindly suggested using 'scipen' option - cf. >> >>> fixed notation will be preferred unless it is more than =C3=A2=E2=82=AC= =CB=9Cscipen=C3=A2=E2=82=AC=E2=84=A2 digits >>> wider. >> However,=20 >> >> options(scipen =3D 50) >> x =3D

Moving from S-plus to R I encountered many great features and a much more stable system. Currently, I am left with 2 problems that are handled differently: 1) I did lots of "overplots" in S-Plus using par(new=T,xaxs='d',yaxs='d') to fix the axes ->What is the workaround in R ? 2) In S-Plus I could fix "scientific notation" or "normal notation" in

Dear Help-Rs,   I'm working with a file that contains large numbers and I need to export them "as is".  for example take:   x <- c(27104010002005,27104020001805,27104090001810,90050013000140,90050013000120) y <- c(1:5) df <- data.frame(cbind(x,y))   When I then try a simple: write.csv(df,file="df.csv")   I get:  x y 1 2.7104E+13 1 2 2.7104E+13 2 3 2.71041E+13 3

Hi, another question: is there any argument that controls the line width of axis box of xyplot()? I tried lwd=2 or lwd.axis=2 in xyplot() or within scales=list() argument, without success. Thanks John

FWIW, it doesn't seem to be happening on Mac OS: > format(2^30, digits=0) [1] "1.e+09" > prettyNum(12345.6, digits=0) [1] "1.e+04" A glibc misfeature? -pd > On 22 Mar 2019, at 10:10 , Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > > Thank you, Robert for raising this here ! > >>>>>> Robert McGehee

Thank you, Robert for raising this here ! >>>>> Robert McGehee >>>>> on Thu, 21 Mar 2019 20:56:19 +0000 writes: > R developers, > Seems I get a bad result ("%#4.0-1e" in particular) when trying to use prettyNum digits=0 with scientific notation. I tried on both my Linux box and on an online R evaluator and saw the same problem, so

Hello R users, I am a bit puzzled by the fact that options(digits=22) x0 <- 69880 y0 <- 26185 x1 <- 69600 y1 <- 22937 number <- paste(x0,y0,x1,y1,sep="") number <- as.numeric(travel) print(number) gives number in scientific notation (some precision is wasted by having a "e+19" at the tail): 6.988026185696e+19 but print(exp(log(number))) gives the

Hi, I have a text (.dat) file, in which each row contains several long numeric strings. One of the strings is 38 digits long, for example: 03200801200801172008011720092904008901 When I read in the data file, this string shows up as 3.200801e+36. To get rid of the scientific notation, I used "options(scipen=999)." When I did this, the scientific notation went away, but the numeric

PROBLEM `signif' does change to scientic notation at different levels depending on the number of significant digits in the input. This can generate tables where figures change ``irregularly'' from normal to scientific notation. PROPOSAL The change to the scientific notation should be made only if the figure in scientific notation - with potentially as

>>>>> peter dalgaard >>>>> on Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:30:19 +0100 writes: > FWIW, it doesn't seem to be happening on Mac OS: >> format(2^30, digits=0) > [1] "1.e+09" >> prettyNum(12345.6, digits=0) > [1] "1.e+04" > A glibc misfeature? It seems (and note we are talking about format.default()

While I'm very pleased with the results I get with rpart and rpart.plot, I would like to change the scientific notation of the dependent variable in the plots into integers. Right now all my 5 or more digit numbers are displayed using scientific notation. I managed to find this: http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e8/help/09/12/8423.html but I do not fully understand what to change, and to