Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "multiple assignments ?"
2004 Jul 09
3
Problem with bwplot
Try factor(vec2) in your bwplot() call.
-----Original Message-----
From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch
[mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch]On Behalf Of Ernesto Jardim
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 9:41 AM
To: Mailing List R
Subject: [R] Problem with bwplot
Hi,
I'm ploting some box-and-whisker plots with bwplot but I'm not getting
any box-and-whiskers ... just dots.
2012 May 04
1
Equality of multiple vectors
Hello,
I'm writing a piece of code where I need to compare multiple same length
vectors.
I've gone through the basic functions like identical() or all(), but they
only work for comparing 2 vectors. From 3 vectors on, it doesn't work .
Example: Assuming
vec1 <- c (1,2,3,4,5)
vec2 <- c(1,2,3,4,5)
vec3 <- c(1,2,3,4,4)
identical (vec1,vec2,vec3) returns TRUE, since the 2
2007 Feb 01
2
Losing factor levels when moving variables from one context to another
Hi, there
I'm currently trying to figure out how to keep my "factor" levels for a
variable when moving it from one data frame or matrix to another.
Example below:
vec1<-(rep("10",5))
vec2<-(rep("30",5))
vec3<-(rep("80",5))
vecs<-c(vec1, vec2, vec3)
resp<-rnorm(2,15)
dat<-as.data.frame(cbind(resp, vecs))
2015 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Incorrect code generated for arm64
Hi all,
I’ve narrowed down a problem in my code to the following test case:
- - - -
typedef struct {float v[2];} vec2;
typedef struct {float v[3];} vec3;
vec2 getVec2();
vec3 getVec3()
{
vec2 myVec = getVec2();
vec3 res;
res.v[0] = myVec.v[0];
res.v[1] = myVec.v[1];
res.v[2] = 1;
return res;
}
- - - -
Compiling this with any level of optimization for arm64 gives incorrect code,
2013 Jun 18
1
transform 3 numeric vectors empty of 0/1
Dear all,
Without a loop, I would like transform 3 numeric vectors empty of 0/1 of
same length
Vec1 : transform 1 to A and 0 to ""
Vec2 : transform 1 to B and 0 to ""
Vec3 : transform 1 to C and 0 to ""
to obtain only 1 vector Vec who is the paste of the 3 vectors (Ex : ABC,
BC, AC, AB,...)
Any idea ?
Thank you for your help
--
Michel ARNAUD
2011 Oct 01
2
Returning vector of values shared across 3 vectors?
Help-Rs,
I've got three vectors representing participants:
vec1 <- c(4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81)
vec2 <- c (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66)
vec3 <- c (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,52)
I'd
2015 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Incorrect code generated for arm64
Thanks Bruce.
> On 4 May 2015, at 13:18, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org> wrote:
>
> I can confirm that, with Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.56) (based on LLVM 3.5svn)
>
> Very strange!
Yes, that’s what I thought. I’ve also checked the binary downloads for OS X from llvm.org <http://llvm.org/> and get the same broken code from both the 3.5.2 and 3.6.0 releases.
2010 Feb 02
1
Build a matrix from another matrix by specifying the indexes
Hello R specialists,
I have a base vector called vBase with 102 elements. I have another vector
vec1 which elements are only part of vBase but is shorter. I transform vec1
so I get a vector with the same size as vBase and with each common element
on the same indexed row. If a value is missing in vec1 then I put a Na like
this:
vec1 vBase
Amsterdam Amsterdam
Na
2012 Aug 24
6
updating elements of a vector sequentially - is there a faster way?
I would like to know whether there is a faster way to do the below
operation (updating vec1).
My objective is to update the elements of a vector (vec1), where a
particular element i is dependent on the previous one. I need to do this on
vectors that are 1 million or longer and need to repeat that process
several hundred times. The for loop works but is slow. If there is a faster
way, please let
2009 Jun 22
2
Help on creating a sequence of vectors
I want to create a number of vectors like :
vec1 <- rnorm(1)
vec2 <- rnorm(2)
vec3 <- rnorm(3)
and so on...........
Here I tried following :
for (i in 1:10) paste("vec", i, sep="") <- rnorm(i)
However obviously that is not working. Here vectors I need to be seperated
i.e I do not want to create a "list". How to modify above code?
--
View this
2012 Nov 08
5
map two names into one
Thanks.
Yes. Your approach can identify:
Glaxy ace S 5830 and
S 5830 Glaxy ace
But you can not identify using same program:
Iphone 4S 16 G
Iphone 4S 16G
How should I solve both in same time.
Kind regards,Tammy
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
1999 Dec 16
2
R question
I have the following question, which is elementary but I am unable to
answer.
In a for(i=10) loop, I am trying to represent the 10 1-dimensional vectors
l1, l2,... l10 by some expression that will run through these values.
ie. soppose I want to add l1 + ... + l10
I could go
x <- 0
for(i in 1:10){ x <- x+ l(i)}
This should return x to be the sum of the 10 li's for i from 1 to 10
2013 Sep 05
2
binary symmetric matrix combination
Hi,
May be this helps:
m1<- as.matrix(read.table(text="
y1 g24
y1 0 1
g24 1 0
",sep="",header=TRUE))
m2<-as.matrix(read.table(text="y1 c1 c2 l17
?y1 0 1 1 1
?c1 1 0 1 1
?c2 1 1 0 1
?l17 1 1 1 0",sep="",header=TRUE))
m3<- as.matrix(read.table(text="y1 h4??? s2???? s30
?y1 0 1 1 1
?h4 1 0 1 1
?s2 1 1 0 1
?s30 1 1 1
2009 Jul 27
1
how to use do.call together with cbind and get inside a function
Dear R-helpers:
I have a question related to using do.call to call cbind and get.
#the following works
vec1 <- c(1,2)
vec2 <- c(3,4)
ColNameVec <- c('vec1','vec2')
mat <- do.call("cbind",lapply(ColNameVec,get))
mat
#put code above into a function then it does not work
#before doing so, first remove vec1 and vec2 from global environment
rm(vec1,vec2)
test
2008 Dec 30
2
[LLVMdev] Folding vector instructions
Hello.
Sorry I am not sure this question should go to llvm or mesa3d-dev mailing
list, so I post it to both.
I am writing a llvm backend for a modern graphics processor which has a ISA
very similar to that of Direct 3D.
I am reading the code in Gallium-3D driver in a mesa3d branch, which
converts the shader programs (TGSI tokens) to LLVM IR.
For the shader instruction also found in LLVM IR,
2008 May 12
1
lexicographic comparison of two vectors
Is there any built-in way to lexicographically compare two vectors of
the same length in R? The textbook algorithm could be coded as follows:
lex.cmp <- function (vec1,vec2) {
for (j in 1:length(vec1)) {
if (vec1[j] < vec2[j]) { return(-1) }
if (vec1[j] > vec2[j]) { return(1) }
}
return(0)
}
Thanks,
Gabriel
2010 Jul 12
2
findInterval and data resolution
Hello Wise Ones...
I need a clever way around a problem with findInterval. Consider:
vec1 <- 1:10
vec2 <- seq(1, 10, by = 0.1)
x1 <- c(2:3)
a1 <- findInterval(x1, vec1); a1 # example 1
a2 <- findInterval(x1, vec2); a2 # example 2
In the problem I'm working on, vec* may be either integer or numeric, like
vec1 and vec2. I need to remove one or more sections of this vector;
2011 Jun 03
2
Arules: R Crashes when running eclat with tidLists=TRUE
Hello,
I'm using the eclat function of the arules package (1.0-6) for the
identification of frequent itemsets. I need the tidLists, but if I set
in the function tidLists=TRUE R crashes (Windows XP Professional SP3,
32 bit, R version 2.12.1 (2010-12-16), reproducible on two different
computers) with two different error messages or non at all. Minimum
examples are:
library(arules)
2001 Nov 01
1
Erratic behaviour of sammon()
I'm not sure this list is the right place for this thing.
I noticed some erratic behaviour in sammon(). Running sammon on
two nearly identical sets of data results in very different
results. Below is an example. I create an initial configuration
with cmdscale() and store it into 'vec1'. I write this to file,
and read it back in again to 'vec2'. According to cor() on the
three
2013 Mar 22
2
A question on function return
Hello again,
Let say I have following user defined function:
fn <- function(x, y) {
Vec1 <- letters[1:6]
Vec2 <- 1:5
return(list(ifelse(x > 0, Vec1, NA), ifelse(y > 0, Vec2, NA)))
}
Now I have following calculation:
> fn(-3, -3)
[[1]]
[1] NA
[[2]]
[1] NA
> fn(3, -3)
[[1]]
[1] "a"
[[2]]
[1] NA
Here I can not understand why in the second case, I get