Displaying 20 results from an estimated 60000 matches similar to: "identical()"
2024 Aug 11
3
Printing
Thanks. Will try it.
Have not tried it but I think the following may work:
out$results<-NULL
out$results$ei<-ap
out$results$vi<-vap
All I need is printing by returning out (unless I turn it off). And,
retrieve ap and vap as needed as shown above. Guess I need to read more
about invisible.
On 8/11/2024 10:09 PM, Rui Barradas wrote:
> ?s 09:51 de 11/08/2024, Steven Yen escreveu:
2024 Mar 26
2
Printout and saved results
How can I have both printout and saved results at the same time.
The subroutine first return "out" and the printout gets printed, but not
saved.
I then run the "invisible" line. Results got saved and accessible but no
printout.
How can I have both printout and also have the results saved? Thank you!
> dstat4 <- function(data,digits=3){
+?? Mean??? <-
2012 Nov 17
3
transform input argument (matrix) of function
Dear list!
I would like to write a function to transform matrix, which is input argument of a written function. It is easy with new matrix (see below), but my idea is to transform input argument (matrix) of function without any additional matrixes. Here is an example:
fun1 <- function(xy) {
xy <- cbind(xy[,1], xy[,2], xy[,1] + xy[,2])
return(xy)
}
df1 <- matrix(c(1,2,3,1,2,3), ncol =
2000 Jun 30
1
dim(a <- ...) sets invisible flag erronously (PR#587)
{Nothing really harmful; R 1.1.0}
dim(.) sets (or doesn't clear) the ``invisible flag'' for printing in
certain circumstances:
> dim(a <- cbind(1))
>
does *not* print as it should :
> dim(a)
[1] 1 1
---
Question to the real "hackers" :
How can I check this using R code alone (not using files),
i.e. (how) can I ask an R expression if its
2024 Mar 26
1
Printout and saved results
I just like the subroutine to spit out results (Mean, Std.dev, etc.) and
also be able to access the results for further processing, i.e.,
v$Mean
v$Std.dev
On 3/26/2024 11:24 AM, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
> Not clear what you mean by "saved".
> If you call a function and the result is printed, the result is
> remembered for a wee while in
> the variable .Last.value, so
2024 Mar 26
1
Printout and saved results
Your desire is not unusual among novices... but it is really not a good idea for your function to be making those decisions. Look at how R does things:
The lm function prints nothing... it returns an object containing the result of a linear regression. If you happen to call it directly from the R command prompt and don't assign it to a variable, then the command interpreter notices that
2024 Mar 26
1
Printout and saved results
Just FYI, the R interpreter typically saves the last value returned briefly
in a variable called .Last.value that can be accessed before you do anything
else.
> sin(.5)
[1] 0.4794255
> temp <- .Last.value
> print(temp)
[1] 0.4794255
> sin(.666)
[1] 0.6178457
> .Last.value
[1] 0.6178457
> temp
[1] 0.4794255
> invisible(sin(0.2))
> .Last.value
[1] 0.1986693
So perhaps if
2024 Mar 26
1
Printout and saved results
Not clear what you mean by "saved".
If you call a function and the result is printed, the result is
remembered for a wee while in
the variable .Last.value, so you can do
> function.with.interesting.result(.......)
> retained.interesting.result <- .Last.value
or even
> .Last.value -> retained.interesting.result
If you know before you start writing the expression that you
2010 Dec 11
1
'identical' and the warning "ignoring non-pairlist attributes"
Dear R developers
Using the 'foreach' package I encounter warnings like
Warning message:
In identical(.combine, cbind) : ignoring non-pairlist attributes
Warnings appear once in a new R-session when I run a
particular piece of code - and not again. I understand from
the source code of 'identical' that the function checks and
believes that .combine and cbind have non-pairlist
2024 Aug 11
1
Printing
?s 09:51 de 11/08/2024, Steven Yen escreveu:
> Hi
>
> In the following codes, I had to choose between printing (= TRUE) or
> deliver something for grab (ei, vi). Is there a way to get both--that
> is, to print and also have ei and vi for grab? Thanks.
>
> Steven
>
> ...
>
> out<-round(as.data.frame(cbind(ap,se,t,p)),digits)
> out<-cbind(out,sig)
>
2012 Jul 01
2
list to dataframe conversion-testing for identical
HI R help,
I was trying to get identical data frame from a list using two methods.
#Suppose my list is:
listdat1<-list(rnorm(10,20),rep(LETTERS[1:2],5),rep(1:5,2))
#Creating dataframe using cbind
dat1<-data.frame(do.call("cbind",listdat1))
colnames(dat1)<-c("Var1","Var2","Var3")
#Second dataframe conversion
2011 Jan 17
2
Summing data frame columns on identical data
Dear all,
I have 9 data frames, and I'm simply trying to sum the values of column 3 (on a row-by-row basis). However, there are a slightly different number of rows in each data frame, so I'm receiving the following error: "Error in Ops.data.frame(mrunoff_207101[3], mrunoff_207102[3]) :
? + only defined for equally-sized data frames".
Here is what I'm attempting to do:
2024 Aug 11
1
Printing
Hi
In the following codes, I had to choose between printing (= TRUE) or
deliver something for grab (ei, vi). Is there a way to get both--that
is, to print and also have ei and vi for grab? Thanks.
Steven
...
out<-round(as.data.frame(cbind(ap,se,t,p)),digits)
out<-cbind(out,sig)
out<-out[!grepl(colnames(zx)[1],rownames(out)),]
if(printing){
cat("\nAPPs of bivariate ordered
2002 Jun 19
4
drawing ellipses
Hello again,
First I want to thank all the people who answered my question about line
width in graphs. I promise I will learn the 'par' help page by heart for
the end of the month !
I now want to trace some ellipses to emphasize groups of data. I found how
to trace circles with 'symbols()', but no ellipse. I'm planning on writing
my own function based on
2011 Aug 11
1
Splitting data
I want to implement the following algorithm in R:
I want to split my data, use a t test to compare both means of the groups to see if they significantly differ from each other. If this is a yes (p < alpha) I want to split again (into 4 groups) and do the same procedure twice, and stop otherwise (here the problem arises). As a final result I would have different groups of data.
I made some
2004 May 14
5
Tagging identical rows of a matrix
I would like to generate a vector having the same length
as the number of rows in a matrix. The vector should contain
an integer indicating the "group" of the row, where identical
matrix rows are in a group, and a unique row has a unique integer.
Thus, for
a <- c(1,2)
b <- c(1,3)
c <- c(1,2)
d <- c(1,2)
e <- c(1,3)
f <- c(2,1)
mat <- rbind(a,b,c,d,e,f)
I would
2013 Feb 14
2
Plotting survival curves after multiple imputation
I am working with some survival data with missing values.
I am using the mice package to do multiple imputation.
I have found code in this thread which handles pooling of the MI results:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2007-May/132180.html
Now I would like to plot a survival curve using the pooled results.
Here is a reproducible example:
require(survival)
require(mice)
set.seed(2)
dt
2009 Oct 29
5
Summing identical IDs
Hello All,
I would like to select records with identical IDs then sum an attribute
then and return them to the data frame as a single record. Please consider
Acres<-c(100,101,100,130,156,.5,293,300,.09)
Bldgid<-c(1,2,3,4,5,5,6,7,7)
DF=cbind(Acres,Bldgid)
DF<-as.data.frame(DF)
So that:
Acres Bldgid
1 100.00 1
2 101.00 2
3 100.00 3
4 130.00 4
5 156.00 5
2010 Dec 23
2
data frame with nested data frame
Dear R-users,
I am somewhat puzzled by how R treats data frames with nested data frames. Below are a couple of examples, maybe someone could help explain what the guiding logic here is.
## construct plain data frame
> z <- data.frame(x=1)
## add a data frame member
> z$y <- data.frame(a=1,b=2)
## puzzle 1: z is apparently different from a straightforward construction of the
2007 Mar 20
1
cbind() & rbind() for S4 objects -- 'Matrix' package changes
As some of you may have seen / heard in the past,
it is not possible to make cbind() and rbind() into proper S4
generic functions, since their first formal argument is '...'.
[ BTW: S3-methods for these of course only dispatch on the first
argument which is also not really satisfactory in the context
of many possible matrix classes.]
For this reason, after quite some discussion on