similar to: Help with graphing impulse response functions

Hi there I'm trying to find the mle fo a multinomial model ->*L(N,h,S?x)*. There is only *N* I want to estimate, which is used in the number of successes for the last cell probability. These successes are given by: p^(N-x1-x2-...xi) All the other parameters (i.e. h and S) I know from somewhere else. Here is what I've tried to do so far for a imaginary data set:

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:12 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:55 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:55 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I will say I'm not a huge fan of adding even more names for things in > >> this fairly

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 6:14 PM Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:48 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:10 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:44 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote:

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:10 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:44 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:12 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:55 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:55 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > I will say I'm not a huge fan of adding even more names for things in > this fairly core/common use case (now we'll have even more vector > names to pick from) - can we use default template arguments so we can > write SmallVector<T> instead of SmallVector<T, N> and would that >

We've pretty happy now with a patch that adds two wrappers around SmallVector that make it 1) more convenient to use and 2) will tend to mitigate misuse of SmallVector. We think it's ready for wider discussion: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90884 SVec<T> is a convenience alias for SmallVector<T, N> with N chosen automatically to keep its size under 64 Bytes (that heuristic is easy

Hello, I have a dataset with proportions that vary around a fixed mean, is it possible to use betareg to look at variance in the dispersion parameter while keeping the mean fixed? I am very new to R but have tried the following: svec<-c(qlogis(mean(data1$scaled)),0,0,0) f<-betareg(scaled~-1 | expt_label + grouped_hpi, data=data1, link.phi="log",

How to determine restricted variable in SVAR and SVEC? There are some values which set to be zero and others set to be NA.. How to determine values that set to be 0? Thanks Regards, Arif _________________________________________________________________ Facebook. k-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-id:SI_SB_2:092009 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, I have a question. How to get the standard errors of alpha and beta when using "ca.jo" to test cointergration? In the paper by Bernhard Pfaff and Kronberg im Taunus “VAR, SVAR and SVEC Models: Implementation Within R Package” pp.24-25. The standard errors are listed on the table 5 following the code: R> vecm.r1 <- cajorls(vecm, r = 1) I tried this in my Mac R, but

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:44 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:12 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:55 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:55 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 7:26 AM Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org> wrote: > On Nov 13, 2020, at 2:06 PM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > We've pretty happy now with a patch that adds two wrappers around > SmallVector that make it 1) more convenient to use and 2) will tend to > mitigate misuse of SmallVector. We think

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 1:55 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:55 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I will say I'm not a huge fan of adding even more names for things in >> this fairly core/common use case (now we'll have even more vector >> names to pick from) - can we use default template

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:48 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:10 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:44 PM Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:12 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at

I will say I'm not a huge fan of adding even more names for things in this fairly core/common use case (now we'll have even more vector names to pick from) - can we use default template arguments so we can write SmallVector<T> instead of SmallVector<T, N> and would that address some of the use cases proposed here? I think someone (JYKnight, perhaps) mentioned in the code

Hi all, I recently noticed that `qnbinom()` can take a long time to calculate a result if the `size` argument is very small. For example qnbinom(0.5, mu = 3, size = 1e-10) takes ~30 seconds on my computer. I used gdb to step through the qnbinom.c implementation and noticed that in line 106 (https://github.com/wch/r-source/blob/f8d4d7d48051860cc695b99db9be9cf439aee743/src/nmath/qnbinom.c#L106)

Full_Name: Justin Harrington Version: 2.4.0 OS: Fedora Core 6 Submission from: (NULL) (142.103.121.203) When I type the (albeit stupid) command eval(match.call()) R crashes with the following messages (truncated): *** buffer overflow detected ***: /usr/lib/R/bin/exec/R terminated The complete output is available at http://md.stat.ubc.ca/Routput.txt For reference, here are the results from

?? I can reproduce this on R Under development (unstable) (2020-07-24 r78910) Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (64-bit) Running under: Pop!_OS 18.04 LTS ? In my opinion this is worth reporting, but discussing it here first was a good idea.? Many more people read this list than watch the bug tracker, so it will get more attention here; once the excitement has died down here (which might be

Hi! Is it somehow possible to disable the known_hosts checking for some hosts? The StrictHostKeyChecking affects only the asking about new computers, but doesn't affect the changed ones. I need it for the test computers, which are reinstalled twice/hour and I really don't like editing .ssh/known_hosts each time :-( Thanks Michal

On Nov 13, 2020, at 2:06 PM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > We've pretty happy now with a patch that adds two wrappers around SmallVector that make it 1) more convenient to use and 2) will tend to mitigate misuse of SmallVector. We think it's ready for wider discussion: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90884 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D90884> >

> On 2020 Nov 17, at 13:40, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 7:26 AM Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org <mailto:clattner at nondot.org>> wrote: > On Nov 13, 2020, at 2:06 PM, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> We've pretty