similar to: Panel regression for zero-inflated count data with over-dispersion?

I'm using the package pglm and I'have estimated a "random probit model". I need to save in a vector the fitted values and the residuals of the model but I can not do it. I tried with the command fitted.values using the following procedure without results: library(pglm) m1_S<-pglm(Feed ~ Cons_PC_1 + imp_gen_1 + LGDP_PC_1 + lnEI_1 +

I am a student who is doing empirical work for his thesis and trying to switch to R. I am familiar with Stata, and at the moment I am trying to replicate some of my previous work. I have a large unbalanced panel data set, observations for different countries between 1970 and 2007. My dependent variable is an overdispersed count. So far I have used fixed-effects negative binomial regression,

Dear Sir, When requesting the summary of pglm analyses in R, I encounter repeatedly the following warning message: "Warning message: In pf(Fstat, object$k - 1, object$n - object$k, ncp = 0, lower.tail = FALSE, : full precision was not achieved in 'pnbeta'" This message appears both with the pglm estimate of Lambda and with Lambda set to 0. Could you tell me what

I am currently using the PGLM package and I would like to implement a within-model. Unfortunately, I do not succeed as I am not a big expert in panel regression. I am using the example data set from the PGLM package: library(pglm) data('Unions', package = 'pglm') anb <- pglm(union~wage+exper+rural, Unions, family=binomial('probit'), model="within", method =

Gracias a todos por sus respuestas, perdón si no fui muy claro. Lo que intento replicar es un análisis realizado en Stata, tengo que hacer los mismos cálculos pero en el r. En Stata lo que se hizo fue: xi: logistic i.coord i.v11_sexo, vce (cluster red) *Vce (cluster clustvar) especifica que los errores estándar permiten la correlación intragrupo, relajando el requisito habitual de que las

Dear R Experts--- Sorry for all the questions yesterday and today. I am trying to use Yves Croissant's pgmm function in the plm package with Blundell-Bond moments. I have read the Blundell-Bond paper, and want to run the simplest model first, d[i,t] = a*d[i,t-1] + fixed[i] + u[i,t] . no third conditioning variables yet. the full set of moment conditions recommended for system-GMM,

Dear all, How do I obtain the number of countries that my panel models estimated by pglm() and relogit() (the latter one is in the Zelig library) use? I couldn't find any information on that in the help files. Thank you very much in advance. Best wishes

I have data on number of vines per tree for ~550 trees. Over half of the trees did not have any vines and the data is fairly skewed (median = 0, mean = 1.158, 3rd qu. = 1.000). I am attempting to investigate whether plot location (four sites), species (I'm using only the four most common species), or tree dbh has a significant influence on the number of vines per tree. When I

Hello, although I searched for a solution related to my problem I didn?t find one, yet. My skills in R aren?t very large, however. For my Diploma thesis I need to run a GMM estimation on a dynamic panel model using the "pgmm" - function in the plm-Package. The model I want to estimate is: "Y(t) = Y(t-1) + X1(t) + X2(t) + X3(t)" . There are no "normal" instruments

Hi, I'd like to hear your opinion about the following proposal to make the computation of dispersion in GLMs more flexible. Dispersion is used in summary.glm; the relevant code chunk with the dispersion calculation is listed below (from glm.R): summary.glm <- function(object, dispersion = NULL, correlation = FALSE, symbolic.cor = FALSE, ...) { est.disp <- FALSE df.r <-

Dear all, I want to build a model in R based on animal collection data, that look like the following Nr Village District Site Survey Species Count 1 AX A F Dry B 0 2 AY A V Wet A 5 3 BX B F Wet B 1 4 BY B V Dry B 0 Each data point shows one collection unit in a certain Village, District, Site, and Survey for a certain Species. 'Count' is the number of animals collected in that

I have been unsuccessful in extracting the dispersion parameter in SPLUS 6.1 using summary or summary.glm(modelobj$dispersion) from a glm object in which the family was set to quasi. This is the syntax given in the manual. I want to write a script to bootstrap the estimate of the dispersion parameter, but cannot seem to access that value. Any suggestions? Thanks, Ed ----------

Hello, I am currently working with the betareg package, which allows the fitting of a variable dispersion beta regression model (Simas et al. 2010, Computational Statistics & Data Analysis). I was wondering whether there is any package in R that allows me to fit variable dispersion parameters in the standard logistic regression model, that is to make the dispersion parameter contingent upon

Hi All, could someone shed some light on what the difference between the estimated dispersion parameter that is supplied with the GLM function and the one that the 'gamma.dispersion( )' function in the MASS library gives? And is there consensus for which estimated value to use? It seems that the dispersion parameter that comes with the summary command for a GLM with a Gamma dist. is

Thank you for your reply. I am aware of the good reasons not to use the deviance estimate in binomial, Poisson, and gamma families. However, for the inverse Gaussian, the choice seems to me less clear cut. So I just wanted to compare two different options. I have used the dispersion parameter to compute the standardized deviance residuals: summary(model.gamma)$deviance.resid

Dear List, I am looking to plot error bars on a line using dispersion. I have values for the upper value and for the lower values, however i am unsure how to plot different values for the upper CI and the lower CI? I have been using dispersion(1:35,sim,simCI,col="red") Where there are 35 points, and simCI relates to a vector containing the lower confidence intervals, however i want

--Multipart_Wed_Feb__4_12:25:40_1998-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Jim, I am relating your message to R-devel. This should be discussed in a broader audience; I am not an expert on GLM's, I know you are and others on this group also... R-develers, please CC to Jim Lindsey (on this topic), since he hasn't been part of the R-devel list for a while.. BTW: I will be gone

Dear R users, I would like to fit a glm with Poisson distribution and log link with a known dispersion parameter. I do not want to estimate the dispersion parameter. I know what it is, so I simply want to fix it at a constant for this and other models to follow. My simple, no covariate model is: Tall.glm<-glm(Seedling~1, family=poisson, offset(log(area)), data=tallPSME.df) I want to

Hi all, How is dispersion calculated within the glm function in R ? Cheers _________________________________________________________________ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body",

Hi, Can someone tell me if it is possible to set the dispersion parameter constant when fitting a negative binomial glm in R? I've looked at the documentation and can't find the appropriate argument to pass. In STATA I can type: nbreg depvar [indepvar...], offset(offset) dispersion(constant). Thank you [[alternative HTML version deleted]]