similar to: cacheSweave / pgfSweave driver for package vignette

Hello all, I would like to ask several questions regarding cacheSweave: 1) Is there a way to set "cache=true" globally? (I tried it using \SweaveOpts but it didn't seem to work) 2) Is there a way to "flush" specific cache once it is created? (other then erasing the entire cache directory)? Changing the code in the code chunk seems to do it, but I am not sure to what

Hi there I have a problem with using Sweave in combination with the option driver = cacheSweave. Whichever code I try to run - when it comes to converting the tex file into pdf it comes up with the same errors (\csname \endcsname errors). Does anybody have an idea what it going wrong? > Sweave("pgfSweave-example.Rnw",driver = cacheSweaveDriver) Writing to file

Dear All, I have been using Sweave (mainly via the Sweave.sh script) and really like it. I am working a paper (using Sweave, of course) which includes several time-consuming computations, and it gets tedious to re-compile the whoel thing every time I made changes. Then I discover the "cacheSweave" package, which seems the right solution to my problem. I only have on problem. Here is

Dear all, When I use the cacheSweave package together with the Sweave option keep.source = TRUE, all the LaTeX code before the Sweave code chunk is included in the TeX file to be compiled. For example, with the following Sweave file \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage[nogin]{Sweave} % Sweave options \SweaveOpts{keep.source=TRUE, strip.white=TRUE, eps=FALSE, pdf=TRUE} \begin{document}

Does anybody have a workable system to run an Rnw document through R-Sweave when necessary, but to just run it through LaTeX if no new R calculations are needed? I.e., the figures already exist, I do not need R to do more work for me, so I send the document straight to LaTeX. I want to leave open the option that I might need to run the document through Sweave in the future, so I don't want

Hi all, I'm struggling a bit to get pgfSweave to lazyload objects when compiling a .Rnw file for a second time. Caching works fine except that for every run all objects get cached again and again. I've used cacheSweave which works fine; all cached objects from code-chunks with option cache = TRUE are lazy loaded. I've tried it on two machines ... I'm pretty sure I'm

Hello, since 3 days now I try to get pgfSweave running using Eclipse + StatET. I created a super simple .Rnw file which can be viewed here: http://www.text-upload.com/read.php?id=147992&c=6441045 test.Rnw When I use sweave it works perfectly fine but when I use pgfSweave I get an error. The R output can be viewed here: http://www.text-upload.com/read.php?id=147995&c=3804886 R output

Hi all, I use the excellent packages rjags and cacheSweave, and unfortunately seem to have found an incompatibility between them. Below are a minimal .Rnw file and corresponding JAGS model file which illustrate the problem: *** JAGS model file; name=j.bug *** model { mu ~ dnorm(0,1.0E-5) sigma ~ dunif(0,100) for(i in 1:length(y)) { y[i] ~ dnorm(mu,sigma) } } *** *** .Rnw

Hi, I would appreciate some help with a very basic problem in using pgfSweave. That is, dealing with the sweave.sty file. After some googling, I did the following : (1) copied the sweave.sty file to my trial folder and (2) added the line?? \usepackage{Sweave}?? to the Rnw file. Are there more elegant ways of dealing with this issue? I have read something about letting Miktex know about the

Dear useRs, I generated a simple image-based report using the sequence: pdf(....) plot(.....) textplot( for short texts, from gplots) dev.off() Is there an easy way to include an single pdf-page from an external file (not R generated). Note: For final reports, I know how to use Sweave, but I am looking for a quick solution with less overhead. Something like textplot() for pdf. Dieter

Hi, Maybe I'm missing the point here...but let's suppose you are working with "large" data sets and using functions that take a significant amount of time to run in R. I woulnd't like to run these functions every time I call Sweave("myfile.Rnw") within R. What is the "common" practice to use Sweave in these situations. I would just run the function once,

Dear all, I'm writing a code that requires Bessel functions with complex argument. Searching the list, I found the continuation of a thread I initiated a few months ago: http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e4/devel/08/03/0746.html As I understand, the most promising option would be to use the fortran or C implementation of Amos,

At long last pgfSweave has finally made its way to CRAN. The pgfSweave package is about speed and style of graphics. For speed, the package provides capabilities for ?caching? graphics generated with Sweave on top of the caching funcitonality of cacheSweave. For style the pgfSweave package facilitates the integration of R graphics with LaTeX reports through the tikzDevice package and eps2pgf

At long last pgfSweave has finally made its way to CRAN. The pgfSweave package is about speed and style of graphics. For speed, the package provides capabilities for ?caching? graphics generated with Sweave on top of the caching funcitonality of cacheSweave. For style the pgfSweave package facilitates the integration of R graphics with LaTeX reports through the tikzDevice package and eps2pgf

Dear All I am preparing a number of vignettes that require a very long time to process with Sweave. The longest one takes 10 hours. I love the weaver package! Is a package that includes such a computationally intensive vignette acceptable on CRAN? Are there any guidelines here? -- Robin K. S. Hankin Uncertainty Analyst University of Cambridge 19 Silver Street Cambridge CB3 9EP

DeaR list, Has anyone tried to mix the Sweave paradigm with the Markdown[*] (and co.) syntax? Would this be hard to implement? My tiny understanding of Sweave is that one can define new drivers for the text part, while some functions that deal with the R code would not require any modification. Here's the reason I'm interested in Mardown for a driver. I've been orbiting

Dear list, I read in ?plotmath that I can use bgroup to draw scalable delimiters such as [ ] and ( ). The same technique fails with < > however, and I cannot find a workaround, grid.text(expression(bgroup("<",atop(x,y),">"))) Error in bgroup("<", atop(x, y), ">") : invalid group delimiter Regards, baptiste sessionInfo() R version

Dear list, I read in ?plotmath that I can use bgroup to draw scalable delimiters such as [ ] and ( ). The same technique fails with < > however, and I cannot find a workaround, grid.text(expression(bgroup("<",atop(x,y),">"))) Error in bgroup("<", atop(x, y), ">") : invalid group delimiter Regards, baptiste sessionInfo() R version

I'm trying to get pgfSweave up and running. Hopefully I can get it working from within LyX, but first I'm just trying to get the simplest possible thing (compiling one of the example files in the pgfSweave package) to work. I'm using the example that comes in the pgfSweave package unmodified, but for reference I copied it to: http://pastebin.com/tW4RL6fs Configuration: R version

Hola a todos: Con la entrada de R 3.0 en Debian Sid me acabo de llevar la sorpresa de que pgfSweave ya no esta mantenido [0]. He intentado compilarlo pero depende de otros paquetes que también se encuentran en el archivo: highlight y parser. En concreto este último falla al compilar (y ahí se acaba el intento). Estaba utilizando pgfSweave por la facilidad para incluir gráficos en Tikz -sin