similar to: Error: evaluation nested too deeply

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 120 matches similar to: "Error: evaluation nested too deeply"

2008 Jan 23
2
from a normal bivariate distribution to the marginal one
Hello, I'm quite new with R and so I would like to know if there is a command to calculate an integral. In particular I simulated a bivariate normal distribution using these simple lines: rbivnorm <- function(n, # sample size mux, # expected value of x muy, # expected value of Y sigmax, # standard deviation of
2012 Nov 16
2
R-Square in WLS
Hi, I am fitting a weighted least square regression and trying to compute SSE,SST and SSReg but I am not getting SST = SSReg + SSE and I dont know what I am coding wrong. Can you help please? xnam <-colnames(X) # colnames Design Matrix fmla1 <- as.formula(paste("Y ~",paste(xnam, collapse=
2004 Dec 29
1
dividing B-trees
[I originally sent this mail to Martin and Richard, but then realised it's of wider interest, so I'm resending it to the list with Martin's reply attached (with his consent)] I was talking to Richard about trying to use shortened dividing keys in the B-trees. Shorter keys are better because you can then fit more in each block, so you need fewer B-tree levels for the same data.
2010 Dec 15
1
pmnorm: probabilites don't sum up to 1
Dear list member, I struggle with the problem, why the probabilities of choosing one of three mutually exclusive alternatives don?t sum up to 1! Let?s assume we have three alternatives X, Y, and Z. Let?s further assume we know their respective utilities: uX, uY, uZ. I?m interested in calculating the probability of choosing X, Y, and Z. Since I assume that the alternatives are mutually
2001 Nov 15
2
matrices
hihi i've a matrix say a(30,10,5). how can a function (for example histogram) be used to calculate along the first axis, or to create a 10x5 matrix of histograms? wolfgang -- Wolfgang Mueller Phone +41 1 256-9203, MeteoSwiss Kraehbuehlstr. 58, mailto:muw at meteoswiss.ch CH-8044 Zuerich, Switzerland http://www.meteoswiss.ch/
2001 Nov 16
1
R BATCH mode
hihi easy! i would like run r in batch mode. how could i pass through arguments for my r.script. for example: r batch my_script.R arg1 arg2 and how must i modify the r script. wolfgang -- Wolfgang Mueller Phone +41 1 256-9203, MeteoSwiss Kraehbuehlstr. 58, mailto:muw at meteoswiss.ch CH-8044 Zuerich, Switzerland http://www.meteoswiss.ch/
2001 Nov 14
1
netCDF
dear R community for this is my first call in the r news group, i hope i'm right. anyway, does anyone knows how to let R writing data into netCDF format. (not using package from unidata) wolfgang -- Wolfgang Mueller Phone +41 1 256-9203, MeteoSwiss Kraehbuehlstr. 58, mailto:muw at meteoswiss.ch CH-8044 Zuerich, Switzerland http://www.meteoswiss.ch/
2008 Feb 29
0
Ticket 6000 (was: a year of rails magic)
On 16/02/2008, Michael Koziarski <michael@koziarski.com> wrote: > > I wonder if I could suggest considering it when you look at ticket > 6000. While this patch no longer applies cleanly, if you took the > time to rebase it against trunk and resubmit it, I''m sure we''d be > happy to apply it. Don''t assume we''re actively disregarding patches
2004 Jan 29
0
Majordomo results: TEST
-- >>>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. **** Command 'this' not recognized. >>>> >>>> ------=_NextPart_000_0009_9A38C670.FD8DF8D3 **** Command '------=_nextpart_000_0009_9a38c670.fd8df8d3' not recognized. >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii **** Command 'content-type:' not recognized.
2005 Mar 18
1
Bivariate normal distribution and correlation
Suppose I know the value of cumulative bivariate standard normal distribution. How can I solve correlation between variables? Pekka --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2001 Sep 04
1
evaluation is nested too deeply: infinite recursion?
I recently started using R (Version 1.3.0 on a Dell machine). After using R for about a week, I started receiving the error message shown below. I can't even run simple commands that I know should work. Is this a bug or did I just mess something up? I've uninstalled and reinstalled R but continue to receive the same errors. The errors are shown below: R : Copyright 2001, The R
2010 Feb 11
0
Recall function: "evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion / options(expressions=)?"
hello all i searched the archives and couldn't get a solution to the following question. i have the following function: F=function(z,v) { if (v==-.5) return(1) else return(2*v/z + 1/Recall(z,v-1)) } and while testing whether it works (ie F(z,v) is approx = besselK(z,1+v)/besselK(z,V). the recursion formula allows one to calculate besselK(z,1+v)/besselK(z,V) for large values of z )
2004 Jan 03
0
error "evaluation nested too deeply" {was "Heatmap"}
I'm diverting this to the more appropriate mailing list, R-help, since heatmap() is standard R function. >>>>> "Johan" == Johan Lindberg <johanl at kiev.biotech.kth.se> >>>>> on Fri, 02 Jan 2004 10:04:14 +0100 writes: Johan> I am trying to plot a matrix of m-values in a heatmap Johan> with "average linkage". The rows
2009 Jan 22
0
error using heatmap :"evaluation nested too deeply....."
Hi, I get following error when trying to plot a heatmap on a very large matrix (808 x5000). heatmap(ctab) Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion / options(expressions=)? Call to heatmap function is not contained within any other function or so. Upon searching the R mailing list, I found that someone had the same problem and the suggested solution was to set an option using
2004 Jul 21
0
error "evaluation nested too deeply" {was "Heatmap"}
Hi, Trying to plot a large dendrogram, I get the recursion limit error Error in match.fun(FUN) : evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion / options(expression=)? but setting options(expressions = 10000) or something large enough to solve the infinite recursion limit problem, I get Error: protect(): stack overflow Is there anything that can be done? Thanks Claudio Donati
2020 Aug 12
0
CVE-2020-12100: Receiving mail with deeply nested MIME parts leads to resource exhaustion.
Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-08-12 Affected product: Dovecot IMAP server Internal reference: DOP-1849 (Bug ID) Vulnerability type: Uncontrolled recursion (CWE-674) Vulnerable version: 2.0 Vulnerable component: submission, lmtp, lda Fixed version: 2.3.11.3 Report confidence: Confirmed Solution status: Fix available Vendor notification: 2020-04-23 CVE reference: CVE-2020-12100 CVSS: 7.5
2020 Aug 12
0
CVE-2020-12100: Receiving mail with deeply nested MIME parts leads to resource exhaustion.
Open-Xchange Security Advisory 2020-08-12 Affected product: Dovecot IMAP server Internal reference: DOP-1849 (Bug ID) Vulnerability type: Uncontrolled recursion (CWE-674) Vulnerable version: 2.0 Vulnerable component: submission, lmtp, lda Fixed version: 2.3.11.3 Report confidence: Confirmed Solution status: Fix available Vendor notification: 2020-04-23 CVE reference: CVE-2020-12100 CVSS: 7.5
2011 Aug 31
2
Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion / options(expressions=)?
Hi all, Why I am getting, Error: evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion / options(expressions=)? Thanks in advance! func <- Vectorize(function(x, a, sad, trunc=0, ...) { result <- function(x) { f1 <- function(n) { dcom <- paste("d", deparse(substitute(sad)), sep="") dots <- c(as.name("n"), list(...)) f <-
2007 Jul 02
2
how to use mle with a defined function
Hi all, I am trying to use mle() to find a self-defined function. Here is my function: test <- function(a=0.1, b=0.1, c=0.001, e=0.2){ # omega is the known covariance matrix, Y is the response vector, X is the explanatory matrix odet = unlist(determinant(omega))[1] # do cholesky decomposition C = chol(omega) # transform data U = t(C)%*%Y WW=t(C)%*%X beta = lm(U~W)$coef Z=Y-X%*%beta
2009 Oct 28
1
'R CMD check' fails with "evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion"
I get the error Error : evaluation nested too deeply: infinite recursion / options(expressions=)? during a 'R CMD check ...' on one of my packages. The reason seems to be that this package is mutually dependent on another one (i.e. the DESCRIPTION files of package A lists package B under "Depends" and vice versa). this might be bad design (having bits in both packages needed