similar to: Question regarding panel data diagnostic

Good day R-users, So if the question may seem easy to many of you but this present a serious issue for me . I'm currently running a panel data analysis i've used the plm package to perform the Tests of poolability as results intercepts and coefficients are assumed different. so my question is should give up the panel analysis in my case or is there any alternative methodology or

Hi all, After writing data in MMF(Memory Map File) using SEXP structure, can i reference in R? If input data is larger than 2GB, Can i reference MMF Data in R? my work environment : R version : 2.11.1 OS : WinXP Pro sp3 Thanks and best regards. Park, Young-Ju from Korea. ---------[ ???????? ???????? ???????? ]---------- ???????? : R-help Digest, Vol 89,

Hello to everyone! I am working on my final year project about multivariate time series. There are three variables in the multivariate time series model. I have a few questions: 1. I used acf and pacf plot and find my variables are nonstationary. But in adf.test() and pp.test(), the data are stationary. why? 2.I use VAR to get a model. y is the matrix of data set and I have made a once

Hi R users, How can I automatically export results and graphs to a file? Thanks in advance Pedro Mota Veiga -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Export-Results-tp2268622p2268622.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi, Am I interpreting the results properly? Are my conclusions correct? > KPSS.test(df) ---- ---- KPSS test ---- ---- Null hypotheses: Level stationarity and stationarity around a linear trend. Alternative hypothesis: Unit root. ---- Statistic for the null hypothesis of level stationarity: 1.089 Critical values: 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.347 0.463

Hello. Not an easy question at all, and it has little to do with software, alas! Veeeeeery loosely speaking: if the homogeneity hypothesis is rejected, then, depending on data availability, you may still be able to treat the data like a panel by: a) ignoring the results of the poolability test b) allowing the coefficients to vary. Of course, a) requires some courage while b) requires more

Hi, How can I access the Values stored in kpssstat-class given by KPSS.test function and store it in a variable. For example: >x <- rnorm(1000) >test <- KPSS.test(ts(x)) >test ---- ---- KPSS test ---- ---- Null hypotheses: Level stationarity and stationarity around a linear trend. Alternative hypothesis: Unit root. ---- Statistic for the null

Hi all, Can anyone clear my doubts about what conclusions to take with the following what puts of some time series tests: > adf.test(melbmax) Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test data: melbmax Dickey-Fuller = -5.4075, Lag order = 15, p-value = 0.01 alternative hypothesis: stationary Warning message: p-value smaller than printed p-value in: adf.test(melbmax)

Hi All, First of all, could you tell me what the "KPSS Level" in the output of the test means? I have a series, x, of periodic data and tried kpss.test() on it to verify its stationarity. The tests gave me the p-value above 0.1. Since the null hypothesis N0 is that the series _is_ stationary, this means that I cannot reject N0. But the series does look periodic! So does all this

is that 'x' is level or trend stationary. I did this > s<-rnorm(1000) > kpss.test(s) KPSS Test for Level Stationarity data: s KPSS Level = 0.0429, Truncation lag parameter = 7, p-value = 0.1 Warning message: p-value greater than printed p-value in: kpss.test(s) My question is whether p=0.1 is a good number to reject N0? On the other hand, I have a

Hi - i am looking for a package with which I can perform panel cointegration tests. Old threads suggest plm and urca package, but I don't find suitable tests in these packs. Somebody knows more? best regards, Philipp -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/panel-cointegration-tp4593443p4593443.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Does anyone know of a test for stationarity of a time series, or like all ordination techniques it is a qualitative assessment of a quantitative result. Books, papers, etc. suggestions welcome. thanks Stephen -- Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff us up and make us feel like gods. We are

Hello, I am very new to R and Time Series. I need some help including R codes about the following issues. I' ll really appreciate any number of answers... # I have a time series data composed of 24 values: myinput = c(n1,n2...,n24); # In order to make a forecasting a, I use the following codes result1 = arima(ts(myinput),order = c(p,d,q),seasonal = list(order=c(P,D,Q))) result2 =

This is not exactly an R question but the R code below may make my question more understandable. If one plots sin(x) where x runs from -pi to pi , then the curve hovers around zero obviously. so , in a"stationary in the mean" sense, the series is stationary. But, clearly if one plots the acf, the autocorrelations at lower lags are quite high and, in the "box jenkins"

I'm trying to understand how to use kpss.test() properly. If I have a level stationary series like rnorm() in the help page, shouldn't I get a small p-value with the null hypothesis set to "Trend"? The (condensed) output from kpss.test() for the two possible null hypotheses is given below. I don't see any significant difference between these results. > x <-

Hi all, Could anybody tell me how to test for stationarity in time series? Thanks a lot! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

How can I make sure the residual signal, after subtracting the trend extracted through some technique, is actually trend-free ? I would greatly appreciate any suggestion about some Stationarity tests. I'd like to make sure I have got the difference between ACF and PACF right. In the following I am citing some definitions. I would appreciate your thoughts. ACF(k) estimates the correlation

Dear List: the CODA and BOA packages for the analysis of MCMC output yield different results on two dignostic test of convergence: 1) Geweke's convergence diagnostic; 2) Heidelberger and Welch's convergence diagnostic. Does that imply that the CODA and BOA packages implement different ``flavors'' of the same test? I paste below an example. Geweke's test

Hi R users: I want to know if any of you had used Stata or Statgraphics. What are the advantages and disadvantages with respect to R on the following aspects? 1. Statistical functions or options for advanced experimental design (fractional, mixed models, greco-latin squares, split-plot, etc). 2. Bayesian approach to experimental design. 3. Experimental design planing options. 4. Manuals

Hi R users! I've come across using kpss tests for time series analysis and i have a question that troubles me since i don't have much experience with time series and the mathematical part underlining it. x<-c(253, 252, 275, 275, 272, 254, 272, 252, 249, 300, 244, 258, 255, 285, 301, 278, 279, 304, 275, 276, 313, 292, 302, 322, 281, 298, 305, 295, 286, 327, 286, 270, 289, 293, 287,