similar to: Heterogeneous variance in two-way mixed ANOVA

Does oneway.test do what you want? Hope this helps, Matt Wiener -----Original Message----- From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Sven Hartenstein Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 3:23 PM To: r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [R] Welch-JM-Test or Brown-Forsythe-Test in R? Hi, I want to test mean differences of > 2 groups with

Dear list members, I am looking for an alternative function for a two-way ANOVA in the case of variance heterogeneity. For one-way ANOVA, I found oneway.test(), but I didn't find anything alike for two-way ANOVA. Does anyone have a suggestion? Thank you! Maike Luhmann Freie Universit?t Berlin

Dear friends, two years ago (as I found on the web) Paul sent the following message but I was not able to find if he got an answer. Today I have the same question and it would be great if I could find out that this test has been implemented (somehow) in R. Please do not confuse it with the Brown-Forsythe test of equality of variances. Thank you: I've been searching around for a function for

Hi, do anyone know which statistical software have the Brown-Forsythe Test for differences of numerical continue data groups wich variance heterogenity? not ofr evaluate the homogenity of variances, for evaluated the differences between groups as ANOVA. thanks Jos?? Herrera M??xico _________________________________________________________________ T1msn Search. Todo lo que buscas ahora m??s

I've been searching around for a function for computing the Brown-Forsythe F* statistic which is a substitute for the normal ANOVA F statistic for when there are unequal variances, and when there is evidence of non-normality. A couple of other people have asked this question, the responses I found have been: ?oneway.test However, that function appears to use the Welch W statistic which,

Dear R-help: Does anyone know of a package in R that will do Welch's modified F-test for heterogeneous error variances? Are there other statistical techniques available in R that test the equality of means when homoscedastisity is violated? 't.test' does this in the pairwise sense when var.equal = TRUE. With best wishes and kind regards I am Sincerely, Corey A. Moffet Support

Hello. I want to estimate the predicted values and standard errors of Y=f(t) and its first derivative at each unique value of t using the smooth.spline function. However, the data (plant growth as a function of time) show substantial heterogeneity of variance since the variance of plant mass increases over time. What is the consequence of such heterogeneity of variance in terms of bias in the

Hi, I am encountering a difficulty I don't understand. Be patient, I'm very new to analysis of variance. If I load this data: example12_7=read.table("http://msemac.redwoods.edu/~darnold/math15/data/chapter12/example12_7.dat",header=TRUE) The run the oneway.test: oneway.test(time~drug,data=example12_7,var.equal=TRUE) I get these results: data: time and drug F = 4.1881, num

Hi, i'm looking for an R function to fit a one-way ANOVA with one factor containing 10 levels. The factor levels have different numbers of observations (varying between 20 to 40). For most of the dependent variables i'm testing there are unequal variances among the factor levels. I see the function oneway.test: oneway.test(variable ~ factor, data=dataset) which by default does not

Hello everyone: I'm a new member of this group. I have a question about "oneway.test". When I use "anova(lm(....))" to analysis the ANOVA, I can get the information about Sum Sq and Mean Sq. (The R code and the results are as follows.)

Hello Using R 2.2.1 on a Windows machine. Has anyone programmed the Welch test for equality of variances? I tried RSiteSearch, but this gave references to t test and oneway.test, which are not quite what I need.....I need the Welch test itself, for use in a meta-analysis (to determine if variances are equal). TIA Peter Peter L. Flom, PhD Assistant Director, Statistics and Data Analysis

My data have heterogeneity of variance (in a categorical variable), do I need to specify a variance structure accounting for this in my model or do GLMMs by their nature account for such heterogeneity (as a result of using deviances rather than variances)? And if I do need to do this, how do I do it (e.g. using something like the VarIdent function in nlme) and in what package? This is my first

Hi all, I have major heterogeneity in variances across labs (100-fold). There is no apparent variance heterogeneity across y-hat. By using lme4 in the following way, am I accounting for the variance differences in labs?: lmer(y ~ fixed1 + covariates + (fixed1|labs)) I'm not sure that it is - I think it is only allowing the means (slopes [conditional means] & intercepts) to differ

Dear all a couple of months ago i've found threads regard test that verify AnOVa assumption on homogeneity of variances. Prof. Ripley advice LDA / QDA procedures, many books (and many proprietary programs) advice Hartley's F_max, Cochran's minimum/maximum variance ratio (only balanced experiments), K^2 Bartlett's test, Levene's test. Morton B. Brown and Alan B. Forsythe in a

Dear All My data consists in 96 groups, each one with 10 observations. Levene's test suggests that the variances are not equal, and therefore I have tried to apply the classical transformations to have homocedasticity in order to be able to use ANOVA. Unfortunately, no transformation that I have used transforms my data into data with homocedasticity. The histogram of variances is at

Hello everybody, I use the sweetpotato database included in R package: data(sweetpotato) This dataset contains two variables: yield(continous variable) and virus(factor variable). Due to Levene test is significant I cannot assume homogeneity of variances and I apply Welch test in R instead of one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey posthoc. Nevertheless, the problems come from when I apply posthoc

Hi helpeRs. When I do two-ways tables dimnames in columns are almost left-adjusted: <- factor(rbinom(30,1,.3),labels=c("first","second")) > b <- a > table(a,b) b a first second first 21 0 second 0 9 If I do a oneway table however, dimnames are right-adjusted: table(a) a first second 21 9 Actually I must admit I

Hi all, I want to write a wrapper for an analysis of variance and I face a curious problem. Here are two different wrappers: fun.1 <- function(formula) { summary(aov(formula)) } fun.2 <- function(formula) { oneway.test(formula) } values <- c(15, 8, 17, 7, 26, 12, 8, 11, 16, 9, 16, 24, 20, 19, 9, 17, 11, 8, 15, 6, 14) group <- rep(1:3, each=7) # While the first

Hi all, I apologize for what might be a silly question. I am interested in doing a one way anova. This is not too hard in and of itself, either with anova, aov or oneway.test . However, I need to 1) get pvalues, 2) do a posthoc analysis with Tukey HSD, 3) and have (sometimes) an unbalanced design. I just can't seem to put all the pieces together. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Dan.

Hi List I'm having difficulty understanding how plm should work with dynamic formulas. See the commands and output below on a standard data set. Notice that the first summary(plm(...)) call returns the same result as the second (it shouldn't if it actually uses the lagged variable requested). The third call results in error (trying to use diff'ed variable in regression) Other info: