similar to: Deleting a variable number of characters from a string

Hello! I found a sample I can ABX successfully when encoded at 133.333 kbps. I was targetting 1 MB/min. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8KWShoIrA1kQzR1Z0FFRUlfcEU floex.wav is 4:54–5:04 of a lossless copy of 'Forget-me-not' by Floex, downloaded from http://store.floex.cz/album/zorya floex-133.opus was created with `opusenc --bitrate 133.333333 floex.wav floex-133.opus`,

Hello! First of all, 100x thanks to Monty and colleagues: you have done an excellent job! I just didn't believe my ears when I first tested Oggenc 1.0 at q0 to q1 - it sounds AMAZINGLY GOOD !!! But as HDD drives are getting larger and cheaper, most of us move toward higher quality settings ......... I use q8, because: - I was able to ABX some test samples up to q4.99 - at q8 Ogg is still

\b is word boundary. But, unexpectedly, strsplit("dia ma", "\\b") splits character by character. > strsplit("dia ma", "\\b") [[1]] [1] "d" "i" "a" " " "m" "a" > strsplit("dia ma", "\\b", perl=TRUE) [[1]] [1] "d" "i" "a" " "

I know my subject line seems odd, but I want to replace an expression—such as a variable—with its value. For example, I want to paste() some strings together, assign the result to a variable s, then use the value of s as a variable to hold another value. Something like this: import_subjects <- function (start, iterations) { for (i in 1:iterations) { # iterate from start to end s <-

This is the new page after the first feedback round: http://audio.sinderman.com/ Comments? Conclusions? Developers feedback? Can someone ABX 60.wav with 60.ogg -q 0? Cheers, AGS. P.S. Garf/Erik, I have included some comments from EAQUAL's author. <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this

I was able to ABX 60.wav from the lame samples up to q=5.9 (13/16 tries at that quality level). I failed to ABX it at q=6.0 (8/16). The sample exhibits a pumping artifact; a "fluttering", if you will, of the amplitude. The effect becomes more pronounced as quality setting / bitrate decreases. Any thoughts? Also - if anyone replies to this, could you CC me a copy? I'm not on the

Interesting. Not what I expected. This is Ruby 1.8.6. > irb irb(main):001:0> str = "abx\bc" => "abx\bc" irb(main):002:0> str.length => 5 irb(main):003:0> s = str.sub(/.\b/, '''') => "ab\bc" irb(main):004:0> s.length => 4 irb(main):005:0> s = str.sub(/.\x08/, '''') => "abc"

>>> Agustín Dall'Alba <agustin at dallalba.com.ar> schrieb am 14.04.2017 um 22:53 in Nachricht <CAHBqS-w3v44WM5x+_4XdFMkD42A2iYTbEWKEBmvJc2P3Y-LJGA at mail.gmail.com>: > I halved the volume of the sample before encoding with > `sox -v 0.5 floex.wav quiet.wav` and now I can't ABX it succesfully anymore. > So the artifact I heard was just clipping when encoding

using iTunes i've noticed that AAC is very good at re-encoding own lossy sound. let's test Opus! neroaacenc.exe -q 0.75 -if 000.wav -of 001.m4a neroaacdec.exe -if 001.m4a -of aac001.wav wavdiff.exe 000.wav aac001.wav Comparing 000.wav - aac001.wav... Max diff: -17.3867dB RMS diff: -33.0851dB Mean diff: -32.4582dB opusenc.exe --bitrate 512 "000.wav" 001.opus opusdec.exe 001.opus

I want to extra the part of the formula not including the response variable from an lm object. For example if the lm object ABx.lm was created by the call ABx.lm <- lm( y ~ A + B + x, ...) Then ACx.lm is saved as part of a workspace. I wish to extract "~ A + B + x". Later in my code I will fit another linear model of the form z ~ A + B + x for some other response variable z. I

I've been running through a collection of hard to encode samples that the lame developers use, and others, doing ABX testing at various quality levels looking for my personal sweet spot. Last time I did this for RC3 I found that most samples where pretty transparent around the 3.5-4 region (my ears aren't that well trained, and I don't want them to be :-), but this time I noticed

Is this just because rsync gives it a work out? I may drop using this motherboard, since the store will not replace it, and thinks it's a hard drive problem, and the board has no way to underclock even as a test. What about changing from 1300 MHz to 800Mhz AThlon processor... think that would help an AZZA KT3 ABX motherboard work easier? John G Austex

This is off-topic, mostly, but I figure you guys will have some knowledge in this sound-quality-related area. I'm sitting here looking at the most recent "Musician's Friend" at headphones and thinking about getting a pair. They've got products from AKG, Fostex, Audio Technica, Nady, Sennheiser, and Sony, at price points ranging from $16 to $130 (list prices $20 to

I know the focus for Opus is low delay, but I've been watching its development with interest because of the potential for audiobook/podcast use, where latency is practically irrelevant. I hear the upcoming USAC codec will give good results for this niche (though listening test results don't seem to be available to the public yet), but I also hear it'll be extremely patent

When using the abx utility that is in LAME's misc dir, trying it on an ogg (with ogg123) gives the following output: Standard Open Source Bug detected, try murksaround ... (ogg123 is decoding to stdout) IIRC this also happened with older mpg123's but no longer with the latest release. Latest ogg123 from CVS still gives it though. Someone stole code but forgot to check for fixes? :)

Am 2017-06-22 um 10:44 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >> Can I fix that without breaking things? > > If your users have files stored on the domain members, probably not. I understand that this just creates the need to run some chown/chgrp-commands after correcting smb.conf and restarting samba? > Your 'idmap config' block on ALL Unix domain members needs to be >

I halved the volume of the sample before encoding with `sox -v 0.5 floex.wav quiet.wav` and now I can't ABX it succesfully anymore. So the artifact I heard was just clipping when encoding or decoding. Opus remains unbeaten for me at 133 kbps. That's totally awesome. Cheers On 10 April 2017 at 17:14, Agustín Dall'Alba <agustin at dallalba.com.ar> wrote: > Hello! I found a

Hello; I am a R newbie and would like to know correct and efficient method for doing string replacement. I have a large data set, where I want to replace character "M", "b", and "K" (currency in Million, Billion and K) to millions. That is 209.7B with (209.7 * 10e6) and 100.00K with (100.00 *1/100) and etc.. d <- c("120.0M", "11.01m",

Hola, Estoy intentando cargar la librería "sqldf" y obtengo este error: > library(sqldf) Loading required package: gsubfn Error : .onLoad failed in loadNamespace() for ''gsubfn'', details: call: get(name, envir = asNamespace(pkg), inherits = FALSE) error: objeto ''addVigs2WinMenu'' no encontrado Error: package ‘gsubfn’ could not be loaded La

Hi, I'm try to collect a list of methods/packages available in R for doing in-string variable/symbol substitution, e.g. someFcn("pi=${pi}"), anotherFcn("pi=@pi@") and so on becomes "pi=3.141593". I am aware of the following: ** gsubfn() in the 'gsubfn' package, e.g. > gsubfn( , , "pi = $pi, 2pi = `2*pi`") [1] "pi = 3.14159265358979,