similar to: How to see inside of this function?

Hello I do not know very much about statistics (and English language too :-( ), then I come in search of a clarification (explanation): I found two distinct results on KURTOSIS and I do not know which of them is the correct one. Any aid will be welcome! klebyn ################ CODE rnorm(1000) -> x library(moments) kurtosis(x) skewness(x) detach("package:moments")

> On Nov 1, 2017, at 12:51 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote: > > The prob package has been archived because it depends upon some other > packages which have issues. > > However, such projects as Introduction to Probability and Statistics in R > depend upon it for learning. There are a few other resources that also use > it. > > Does anyone

> On Nov 2, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote: > > The issue is fAsianOptions. Is there a version that works with the latest version of R? If not, which version of it works with which version of R and where can it be found? I tried several at the archive already. sessionInfo() R version 3.4.2 Patched (2017-10-04 r73465) Platform:

The issue is fAsianOptions. Is there a version that works with the latest version of R? If not, which version of it works with which version of R and where can it be found? I tried several at the archive already. Alternatively, is there another package that behaves similarly to prob? On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:17 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: > > > On Nov

Yes. That's the version I've been discussing that has non-zero exit status. That situation is why CRAN retired the prob package. It's possible you installed that library earlier in development and it's been "carried" along. It no longer installs, now. The problems with all of this seem to have started this month according to the conversations. However, no one has

> On Nov 2, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes. That's the version I've been discussing that has non-zero exit status. That situation is why CRAN retired the prob package. It's possible you installed that library earlier in development and it's been "carried" along. It no longer installs, now. > > The problems

Yes, that is exactly what I was doing two days ago. Warning in install.packages : installation of package ?fAsianOptions_3010.79.tar.gz? had non-zero exit status Which is what a reading of the explanation for why "prob" was retired leads one to expect. Do you have some other suggestion about how to get it to work? I notice you're not using Windows which might have a relationship

> On Nov 2, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, that is exactly what I was doing two days ago. > > Warning in install.packages : > installation of package ?fAsianOptions_3010.79.tar.gz? had non-zero exit status > > Which is what a reading of the explanation for why "prob" was retired leads one to expect. Do you have

> On Nov 2, 2017, at 2:14 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote: > > Rtools is not available for the current version of R. Really? If true, I'm surprised and not able to help. I do see an Rtools34.exe at https://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/Rtools/ -- David. > > What I'm looking for is an alternative package or how others have managed to create

Rtools is not available for the current version of R. What I'm looking for is an alternative package or how others have managed to create workarounds. On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 4:25 PM, David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net> wrote: > > > On Nov 2, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Yes, that is exactly what I was doing

> On Nov 2, 2017, at 3:46 PM, Tiby Kantrowitz <tlkantro at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks. I found that, and installed it and got the same message. Here: > > RTools version 3.4 > > install.packages("fAsianOptions_3010.tar.gz", I don't see a path to that file's location. The expansion from pkg_version.tar.gz might be automatic, but I do generally

Thanks. I found that, and installed it and got the same message. Here: RTools version 3.4 install.packages("fAsianOptions_3010.tar.gz", dependencies=TRUE, repos=NULL, type = "source") Installing package into ?C:/Users/Tlk7/Documents/R/win-library/3.4? (as ?lib? is unspecified) Warning: invalid package 'fAsianOptions_3010.tar.gz' Error: ERROR: no packages specified

Hi, in which R-package I could find skewness and kurtosis measures for a distribution? I built some functions: gamma1<-function(x) { m=mean(x) n=length(x) s=sqrt(var(x)) m3=sum((x-m)^3)/n g1=m3/(s^3) return(g1) } skewness<-function(x) { m=mean(x) me=median(x) s=sqrt(var(x)) sk=(m-me)/s return(sk) } bowley<-function(x) { q<-as.vector(quantile(x,prob=c(.25,.50,.75)))

It is a pleasure for me to announce the new built for Rmetrics Version 191.0057. The source files and Windows binary packages can be downloaded from www.rmetrics.org . The new built has also been submitted to the CRAN server. Some new functions and example files have been added. Unfortunately the user guides and reference guides are not yet updated, they have still the status of Version

Greetings Everybody: I generated a 1.2MB dta file based on the general social survey with Stata8 for linux. The file can be re-opened with Stata, but when I bring it into R, it says all the values are missing for most of the variables. This dataset is called "morgen.dta" and I dropped a copy online in case you are interested http://www.ku.edu/~pauljohn/R/morgen.dta looks like this

Hi, from what you're writing: "The logaritmic transformation "shapiro.test(log10(y))" says: W=0.9773, p-value= 2.512e-05." it seems the log-values are not distributed normally and so original data are not distributed like a log-normal: the p-value is extremally small! Other tests for normality are available in package: nortest compare the log-transformation of your ecdf

Happy 2013! Can someone with more knowledge of edge case scoping/eval rules explain what is happening below? Happens in all the versions of R I have on hand. Behavior itself is confusing, but ?as.environment also provides no clue. The term used in that doc is 'search list', which is ambiguous, but the see also section mentions search(), so I would *think* that is what is intended.

On Aug 22, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > The LLVM passes are responsible to take appropriate actions based on > Function > Notes associated with function definition. For example, > > define void @fn1() notes("opt-size=1") { ... } > > The function fn1() is being optimized for size without losing > significant > performance. The inliner will

> exampledata <- rnorm(10000) > summary(exampledata) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. -4.030000 -0.666200 -0.023390 -0.009384 0.664700 4.092000 > desc <- function(mydata) { + require(e1071) + quantls <- quantile(x=mydata, probs=seq(from=0, to=1, by=0.25)) + themean <- mean(mydata) + thesd <- sd(mydata) + kurt <-

Dear all, as per my understanding, outer() function is to facilitate 2-dimensional function evaluation, like to evaluate f(x,y) for different values of x and y. However I have slightly modified version of that, where x is a matrix with, say, 5 rows and 2 columns and y is a vector. Let take following example: fn1 <- function(x1, x2, y) return (x1+x2+y) x <- matrix(1:10, nc = 2) y