similar to: Which greylisting milter?

As I mentioned on this list before, I'm switching from Fedora 6 to Centos 5. I'm setting up the mail server and on Fedora I used the milter rpms for greylisting, spamassassin, mimedefant etc. However I don't see that those are included with Centos? Is this true, or do my yum repositories need to be changed to look in an 'extras' location? Or is there some other source

Is anyone using Milter-Greylist? Is there a repository out there with an rpm available? JP -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060213/036d4b7e/attachment-0002.html>

Whats a good antispam solution? I am using sendmail and dovecot 1.1. I came across dovecot's antispam plugin, but it seems it does not support 1.1 yet. I am also looking for something non-perl based. I am already doing some greylisting with sendmail milter. Any other good suggestions? If not, I guess I might have to downgrade back to 1.0 dovecot. Thanks

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 02:43:30PM -0400, Fred Smith wrote: > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 02:38:05PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:19:49AM -0400, mark wrote: > > > Fred Smith wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:28:23AM -0400, mark wrote: > > > <MVNCH> > > > > One thing I don't understand is how/why the

Gents, I have added the following to /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and rebuilt it trying to control spam. I still get about 25 spam messages a day. Is there something else that can help control spam? Thanks jerry --------------------------- dnl # dnl # dnsbl - DNS based Blackhole List/Black List/Rejection list dnl # See http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#dnsbl dnl # FEATURE(`dnsbl',

hey, I upgraded a server to 5.3 from 5.2 today, its a mail server, and its using the rpmforge clamav milter... was getting errors in my mail log like... Apr 6 01:39:32 freescruz sendmail[12304]: n368dWxW012304: Milter (clamav): error connecting to filter: Connection refused by /var/clamav/clmilter.socket Apr 6 01:39:32 freescruz sendmail[12304]: n368dWxW012304: Milter (clamav): to error

I wish to add options to sendmail INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`spamassassin', `S=local:/var/run/spamass-milter/spamass-milter.sock, F=T, T=C:5m;S:4m;R:4m;E:5m')dnl dnl MAILER(cyrusv2)dnl INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`greylist', `S=local:/var/run/milter-greylist/milter-greylist.sock') define(`confMILTER_MACROS_CONNECT', `j, {if_addr}') define(`confMILTER_MACROS_HELO', `{verify},

Hello! I'm running clamav-milter, clamd, and sendmail on CentOS 3.3 (RHEL3). I'm trying to verify that my milter works. I've sent test emails from testvirus.org but they don't appear to be getting flagged. I don't see anything in the logs to indicate they were. Is there a sure-fire way to know? Also, how should the clamd work? Does it watch the filesystem? Or will it only work

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:04 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ken Smith <kens at kensnet.org> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm just wanting to check that my understanding of the settings is >> correct >> as my web searches are finding a lot of dated information. >> >> If I want a Centos 6 sendmail system act as the

dear All, I am jus installed centOS 5.0 from the distrubution to be as our mail server i have installed the following sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5 mailsacnner 4.61.7 spamassassin 3.2.1 clamav-0.91-1.el5.rf and every thing is workin fine but i want to implement domain keys so i downloaded the dkim-milter-1.2.0 and uncompress it edited the site.config.m4 file n folled intructions in the

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > > I stated pure observation on at least two pairs of primary - backup MX I > maintain. Still I made backup MXes with greylisting as well (they are > separately hit by same bad spammers scripts, at a rate about 10 times > smaller than primary MXes are and absolutely independently). I think

I am trying to install dkim-milter-2.7.2 on a Centos 5.2 system and keep getting the following errors. I have very little experience in C programing so I am at a loss as how to proceed. I have sendmail-devel installed Here is the tail of the result output of sh ./Build make[2]: cc: Command not found make[2]: *** [assert.o] Error 127 make[2]: Leaving directory

I've recently switched to using spamassassin via a sendmail milter, rather than using procmail to invoke it. This means that I get a number of messages appearing in my maillog, and then being reported by logwatch as unmatched entries. An example of such a messages is: Feb 27 04:33:09 quail sendmail[24780]: p1R4X46P024780[2]: URIBL blacklist\n\t* [URIs: tablettoxicspillsrx.ru]\n\t* 1.5

I tried to google, but find no directions for configuring this. I would like to 1) limit greylisting only for messages that come from other countries 2) give higher spam level to these messages (preferably only for certain receiving email addresses) I already have installed geoip.x86_64 (1.4.6-1.el5.rf). How to proceed? Or should I move to CentOS 6 for this? - Jussi

On Fri, February 13, 2015 11:52 am, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never

Our backup mail server (which I have just re-configured) tries to contact the primary mail server, and fails. My log shows repeatedly "connection refused": May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: makeconnection (mail.greenspot.fi. [83.143.217.182]) failed: Connection refused by mail.greenspot.fi. May 15 22:21:41 mx2 sm-mta-rx[8674]: q4FIhPij007483: to=<myuser at

I've been running sendmail since the beginning of my online time. 1. Did I see that postfix can run sendmail milters? 2. If so, did I read that postfix can run these separately for inbound vs. outbound? 3. Can it run like a rbl blacklist on inbound and not outbound? 4. If the above is true, does this require separate configurations of postfix or is it already set to allow this out of the

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects > > Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, > still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never will come > through backup MX. This is due to the same reason why greylisting is >

On Fri, February 13, 2015 12:18 pm, Ken Smith wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev >> <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >>> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >>> still what is killed by greylisting by

Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >>> Otherwise it accept junk that your primary rejects >> Not exactly. If greylisting on primary is set, but on backup MX is not, >> still what is killed by greylisting by primary MX, almost never will come >> through backup MX. This is due to the