similar to: Interpreting lm Residuals...

hi all i have a function that uses two inputs, say xdata and ydata. An example is the following, simple1<-function(xdata,ydata) { ofit<-lm(ydata~xdata) list(ofit) } say i use arbitray number for xdata and ydata such that D = x1 x2 y 1 1 10 2 6 6 3 10 7 x<-D[,1:2] and y<-D[,3] if one uses these inputs and rund the program we get the following: >simple(xdata=x,ydata=y)

Hello, I'm quite new to R and want to make a Weibull-regression with the survival package. I know how to build my "Surv"-object and how to make a standard-weibull regression with "survreg". However, I want to fit a translated or 3-parametric weibull dist to account for a failure-free time. I think I would need a new object in survreg.distributions, but I don't know how

Hello, I want to run the following commands as a script(.r or .bat) and save the output in an external file through Windows OS. data<-read.csv(file="wgatever.csv", head=TRUE, sep=",") summary(data$SQFT) hist(data$STAMP) hist(data$STAMP, col='blue') hist(data$SHIP, col='blue') How could I do that? I have a great problem using the sink() function

I am using windows XP with R 2.8.1 I am generating a lattice plot of annual rain patterns using the following function: > xyplot(rain.stats$min+ rain.stats$max + rain.stats$ave ~ rain.stats$month |rain.stats$year, lty = 1, data = rain.stats, type = c("l","l", "l"), col = c("red", "blue", "green"), distribute.type =

Hi all, I was trying to plot a graph using the following data: method percent accuracy group A1 4 0.8529 cns A1 10 0.8412 cns A1 15 0.8235 cns A2 4 0.9353 cns A2 10 0.9412 cns A2 15 0.9471 cns A1 4 0.8323 col A1 10 0.8452 col A1 15 0.8484 col A2 4 0.8839 col A2 10 0.8677 col A2 15 0.8678 col ################# The code I'm using to generate the graphs is: ### code :

OK, I really dread to ask that .... much more that I know some discussion about p-values and if they are relevant for regressions were already on the list. I know to get p-val of regression coefficients - this is not a problem. But unfortunately one editor of a journal where i would like to publish some results insists in giving p-values for the squared deviance i get out from different glm and

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Rob Groner wrote: > I executed lsusb to verify the USB device is there, and it is. I tried > the shutdown command again with debug enabled, but it didn't seem to > reveal much more: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > rtd at linux-5048:~> sudo /usr/local/ups/sbin/upsdrvctl -DDDDD shutdown

On Sep 8, 2015, at 4:48 PM, Rob Groner <rgroner at RTD.com> wrote: > > 0.005927 Device matches > 0.005940 failed to claim USB device: Device or resource busy > 0.005954 failed to detach kernel driver from USB device: No such file or directory Rob, this is a bit of a tough one to track down. The "Device or resource busy" message can either come from a kernel

Hello, I am currently switching to ldd from ld.bfd on a cross-platform embedded project and am facing a behaviour difference when using the same linker scripts with ld.bfd and ldd. Could anybody please give me a more reliable direction I should go with to get the same behaviour from both of the linkers? Target binary format is a 32-bit ELF executable, which is expected to consist of a single RWX

.. And a version without the API changes. -------------- next part -------------- Index: libspeex/resample_sse.h =================================================================== --- libspeex/resample_sse.h (revision 0) +++ libspeex/resample_sse.h (revision 0) @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +/* Copyright (C) 2002-2008 Jean-Marc Valin + * Copyright (C) 2008 Thorvald Natvig + */ +/** + @file resample_sse.h +

Hi, Here's the (hopefully) final version of the resampler, now always using st->mem as the buffer area. It only allocates buffers on the stack when it's necesarry to convert the output between int and float. -------------- next part -------------- Index: include/speex/speex_resampler.h =================================================================== ---

As I've mentioned before[1] I've been regularly attempting to build the FreeBSD/amd64 base system with lld, in order to keep track of progress and identify issues on an ongoing basis. As of last November a 'buildword' (i.e., userland build) ran to completion, with several workarounds applied to the FreeBSD base system. However, the result did not actually work. I'm pleased to

Hi I have a set of data with both quantitative and categorical predictors. After scaling of response variable, i looked for multicollinearity (VIF values) among the predictors and removed the predictors who were hinding some of the other significant predictors. I'm curious to know whether the predictors (who are not significant) while doing simple 'lm' will be involved in

Hi I have a set of data with both quantitative and categorical predictors. After scaling of response variable, i looked for multicollinearity (VIF values) among the predictors and removed the predictors who were hinding some of the other significant predictors. I'm curious to know whether the predictors (who are not significant) while doing simple 'lm' will be involved in

Hi all, How can we use ks.test() to evaluate goodness of fit of mixtures of distributions? For example I have the following dataset: > x [1] 176.1 176.8 259.6 171.6 90.0 234.3 145.7 113.7 105.9 176.2 168.9 136.1 [13] 109.2 110.3 164.3 117.7 131.3 163.7 200.4 196.4 196.2 168.6 190.4 127.5 [25] 136.0 114.2 112.0 91.9 333.4 295.5 172.0 293.3 91.7 289.7 118.8 55.1 [37] 161.9 233.9 197.7

Charles, dmesg doesn't say anything when "usbhid-ups -a rtdups -k" is executed. I'm not sure which USB lib it compiled against. I installed them via "zypper install libusb-*". I'll try to find the version that got installed, as that WOULD be one thing that might have changed since the last time I had this working. I'm not sure how to check for multiple

Actually opus-tools-0.2 has the same issue. Sincerely Forrest Zhang -------------- next part -------------- Add "#define FIXED_POINT 1" into the top of resample.c, outputs of resample are all zeros. Actually the data transform is required before/after calling speex_resampler_process_native(). diff -Naupr libopusenc-0.2.1-vanilla/src/resample.c libopusenc-0.2.1/src/resample.c ---

Roger, rtd at linux-5048> sudo /usr/local/ups/bin/usbhid-ups -a rtdups -k -DDD Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.39 (2.7.2.6_RTD) USB communication driver 0.32 0.000000 debug level is '3' 0.000405 upsdrv_initups... 0.004386 Checking device (0930/6545) (002/002) 0.004431 Failed to open device, skipping. (Permission denied) 0.004442 Checking device (1D6B/0002)

After applying the "step" command to a long list of predictors I came up with the following showing there still are some non significant coefficients. I'd like to try the command "leap". However, I don't quite understand how it returns the spared predicting variables. Can please, someone help ? Tank you in advance. Mara EM > summary(stepmod) Call: lm(formula =

As you may have noticed, I have been working on a fast register allocator in the last week. The new allocator is intended to replace the local allocator for debug builds. Both allocators use a local allocation strategy. Each basic block is scanned from top to bottom, and virtual registers are assigned to physical registers as they appear. There are no live registers between blocks. Everything is