similar to: Fixed Effects Estimations (in Panel Data)

Hello, I am using {plm} to estimate panel models. I want to estimate a model that includes fixed effects for time and individual, but has a random individual effect for the coefficient on the independent variable. That is, I would like to estimate the model: Y_it = a_i + a_t + B_i * X_it + e_it Where i denotes individuals, t denotes time, X is my independent variable, and B (beta) is the

Hi everyone, I am doing panel data analysis using the 'plm' package. However, I have noticed that the plm() function reports a different value of R-squared from the R-squared of the lm() function with time-demeaned data. To be clear, I have tried to compute the within model both manually (run an OLS regression with time-demeaned data using lm()) and by using plm(). The two methods give me

Hi, my data set is data.frame(id, yr, y, l, e, k). I would like to estimate Lee and Schmidts (1993, OUP) model in R. My colleague wrote SAS code as follows: ** procedures for creating dummy variables are omitted ** ** di# and dt# are dummy variables for industry and time ** data a2; merge a1 a2 a; by id yr; proc sysnlin maxit=100 outest=beta2; endogenous y; exogenous l e k

Dear R users, I have an unbalanced panel with an average of I=100 individuals and a total of T=1370 time intervals, i.e. T>>I. So far, I have been using the plm package. I wish to estimate a FE model like: res<-plm(x~c+v, data=pdata_frame, effect="twoways", model="within", na.action=na.omit) ?where c varies over i and t, and v represents an exogenous impact on x

R version 2.5.0, under gentoo linux. This may be just my ignorance about naming conventions inside loops and subsets, but the following appears like a bug to me. y = c( 1963, 1963, 1964, 1964, 1965, 1965 ); r1= rnorm(6); d= data.frame ( y=y, r1=r1 ); ## note: I am not attach()ing anything anywhere ## this should give me two results, which it does ahw.y= subset(d, d$y==1963);

Dear R-helpers, I have a very simple question and I really hope that someone could help me I would like to estimate a simple fixed effect regression model with clustered standard errors by individuals. For those using Stata, the counterpart would be xtreg with the "fe" option, or areg with the "absorb" option and in both case the clustering is achieved with "vce(cluster

Dear Sir/ Madam, I am writing about the panel data for my bachelor degree. I would really appreciate if You could help dealing with R functions. I am trying to estimate the panel data lm model with plm function. When i include 3dummy variables into the regression it dont appear in the sumarry of the model, but when i estimate a simple lm model it appears. Why is it so? What should i do to

Is there a way to recover the model matrix that is being used by the plm package? For example, if you run a panel regression with fixed effects, the model matrix would contain the generated dummy variables for the groups. Thanks. Abiel Reinhart This communication is for informational purposes only. I...{{dropped:30}}

Dear R Experts--- Sorry for all the questions yesterday and today. I am trying to use Yves Croissant's pgmm function in the plm package with Blundell-Bond moments. I have read the Blundell-Bond paper, and want to run the simplest model first, d[i,t] = a*d[i,t-1] + fixed[i] + u[i,t] . no third conditioning variables yet. the full set of moment conditions recommended for system-GMM,

Hello, I am switching to R from Stata and I am having particular trouble with the transition from Stata's 'xtabond' and 'ivreg' commands to the "plm" package. I am trying to replicate some of the dynamic panel data work using the UK Employment data in Arellano and Bond (1991) and available as 'EmplUK' under the 'plm' package. I have been

Dear R users, I wish to manually demean a panel over time and entities. I tried to code the Wansbeek and Kapteyn (1989) transformation (from Baltagi's book Ch. 9). As a benchmark I use both the pmodel.response() and model.matrix() functions in package plm and the results from using dummy variables. As far as I understood the transformation (Ch.3), Q%*%y (with y being the dependent variable)

Hello to all on the list, I'm trying to estimate a fixed effects model from a large (unbalanced) panel data set. I have no problems when using only an individual effect or only a time effect, but I get an error message when I try for a "twoways" effect. Here is some of the code: paneldata27 is the entire panel data set: > dim(paneldata27) [1] 1178831 8 >

Dear R-helpers, First of all, sorry for those who have (eventually) already received that request. The mail has been bumped several times, so I am not sure the list has received it... and I need help (if you have time)! ;-) I have a very simple question and I really hope that someone could help me I would like to estimate a simple fixed effect regression model with clustered standard errors by

Hi there, Maybe people who know both R and econometrics will be able to answer my questions. I want to run panel regressions in R with fixed-effect. I know two ways to do it. First, I can include factor(grouping_variable) in my regression equation. Second, I plan to subtract group mean from my variables and run OLS panel regression with function lm(). I plan to do it with the second way because

Dear R users I get different F-statistic results for a "within" model, when using "time" or "twoways" effects in plm() [1] and when manually specifying the time control dummies [2]. [1] vignette("plm") [2] http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/Farnsworth-EconometricsInR.pdf Two examples below: library("AER") data("Grunfeld", package =

Hi all, what indicates the parameter theta in the summary of a random effect panel model estimated with the plm function? example: data("Produc", package = "plm") zz <- plm(log(gsp) ~ log(pcap) + log(pc) + log(emp) + unemp, model="random", data = Produc, index = c("state","year")) summary(zz) Effects: var std.dev

Hello, although I searched for a solution related to my problem I didn?t find one, yet. My skills in R aren?t very large, however. For my Diploma thesis I need to run a GMM estimation on a dynamic panel model using the "pgmm" - function in the plm-Package. The model I want to estimate is: "Y(t) = Y(t-1) + X1(t) + X2(t) + X3(t)" . There are no "normal" instruments

Dear all I am working on unbalanced panel data and I can readily fit a "pooling" model using plm(), but not a "within" or "random" model. Reproducing the examples in vignette("plm") and in the AER package I encountered no such issues. ##unfortunately I cannot disclose the data, and it is too big anyway > dim(ibes.kld.exp.p[x.subs , ]) [1] 13189 34

Hello Everyone (Quick) question: Does anyone know a package/command or simply a way of creating a table of different panel data estimations (estimated using /*plm()*/ ) just as *mtable()* does for models estimated with /*lm()*/? It seems *mtable* (and *apsrtable* equally) only support /*lm*/ and some other classes but unfortunately not /*plm*/. I am pretty sure others must have encountered this

Hello everyone, I have a peoblem to create the twoways effect in the plm package. when i try to create the following dsn1<-plm(lnQ~lnC+lnL+lnM+lnE+eco+RD,data=newdata,effect="twoways",model="within") i have this error: Error in rep.int(c(1, numeric(n)), n - 1L) : negative length vectors are not allowed and to be honest i have no idea what does it mean!! can someone