similar to: Displaying smooth bases - mgcv package

Hello, I am a bit confused about gamm in mgcv. Consulting Wood (2006) or Ruppert et al. (2003) hasn't taken away my confusion. In this code from the gamm help file: b2<-gamm(y~s(x0)+s(x1)+s(x2)+s(x3),family=poisson,random=list(fac=~1)) Am I correct in assuming that we have a random intercept here....but that the amount of smoothing is also changing per level of the

Dear R-helpers, I'd like to understand how to test the statistical significance of a random effect in gamm. I am using gamm because I want to test a model with an AR(1) error structure, and it is my understanding neither gam nor gamm4 will do the latter. The data set includes nine short interrupted time series (single case designs in education, sometimes called N-of-1 trials in medicine)

Hello, Why would I get an error message with the following code for gamm? I want to fit the a gam with different variances per stratum. library(mgcv) library(nlme) Y<-rnorm(100) X<-rnorm(100,sd=2) Z<-rep(c(T,F),each=50) test<-gamm(Y~s(X),weights=varIdent(form=~1|Z)) summary(test$lme) #ok summary(test$gam) Gives an error message: Error in inherits(x, "data.frame")

Dear R-help users, I am trying to analyze some visual transect data of organisms to generate a habitat distribution model. Once organisms are sighted, they are followed as point data is collected at a given time interval. Because of the autocorrelation among these "follows," I wish to utilize a GAM-GEE approach similar to that of Pirotta et al. 2011, using packages 'yags' and

Hello, I'm running mixed models in GAMM4 with 2 (non-nested) random intercepts and I want to include a spline term for one of my exposure variables. However, when I include a spline term, I always get reported degrees of freedom of less than 1, even when I know that my spline is using more than 1 degree of freedom. For example, here is the code for my model: >

Hi all, I am not used to using the computer to do calculus and have up to now done my differentiation "by hand" , calling on skills I learned many years ago and some standard cheat sheets. My interest at present is in getting the second derivative of a gaussian, which I did by hand and results in a somewhat messy result involving terms in sigma^5 .. I have done some spot checks

Dear R-users, To obtain the percentage of deviance explained when fitting a gam model using the mgcv library is straightforward: summary(object.gam) $dev.expl or alternatively, using the deviance (deviance(object.gam)) of the null and the fitted models, and then using 1 minus the quotient of deviances. However, when a gamm (generalizad aditive mixed model) is fitted, the

I've been trying to get comfy with arima() and associated functions in the ts() package. I'm thinking seriously about using this package, and R generally, in a 4th year intro time series course that I'm teaching this autumn. I have a couple of questions about arima: (1) The help file says that residuals component of the value returned by arima() consists of the

Hi I am an engineer and am running the package mgcv and specifically the command gamm (generalized additive mixed modelling), with random effects. i have a few queries: 1. When I run the command with 1000/2000 observations, it runs ok. However, I would like to see the results as in vis.gam command in the same package, with the 3-d visuals. It appears no such option is available for gamm in the

Dear useRs, I am using the gamm function in the mgcv package to model a smooth relationship between a covariate and my dependent variable, while allowing for quantification of the subjectwise variability in the smooths. What I would like to do is to make subjectwise predictions for plotting purposes which account for the random smooth components of the fit. An example. (sessionInfo() is at

In the summary of the gam object produced by gamm, the "Approximate significance of smooth terms" appears to be a test of the improvement in fit over a linear model, rather than a test of the significance of the overall effect of x on y: test.gamm<-gamm(y~te(x, bs="cr"), random=list(grp=~1)) summary(test.gamm$gam) . . . Approximate significance of smooth terms:

Hello:I run a gamm with following call :mode<-gamm(A~B,random=list(ID=~1),family=gaussian,na.action=na.omit,data=rs)an error happened:ERROR names(object$sp) <- names(G$sp) : attempt to set an attribute on NULLwith mgcv version 1.7-3What so? How can I correct the Error? Thanks very much for any help. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, I am using the "mgcv" package by Simon Wood to estimate an additive mixed model in which I assume normal distribution for the residuals. I would like to test this model vs a standard parametric mixed model, such as the ones which are possible to estimate with "lme". Since the smoothing splines can be written as random effects, is it correct to use an (approximate)

Hi, Am not sure if my code itself is correct. Here's what am trying to do: Minimize integration of a function of gaussian distributed variable 'x' over the interval qnorm(0.999) to Inf by changing value of parameter 'mu'. mu is the shift in mean of 'x'. Code: # x follows gaussian distribution # fx2 to be minimized by changing values of mu # integration to be done over

Dear all, I run a gamm with following call : result <- try(gamm(values~ s( VM )+s( RH )+s( TT )+s( PP )+RF+weekend+s(day)+s(julday) ,correlation=corCAR1(form=~ day|month ),data=tmp) )" with mgcv version 1.6.2 No stress about the data, the error is not data-related. I get : Error in isS4(x) : object 'VM' not found What so? I did define the dataframe to be used, and the

Dear all, apologies for this (perhaps recurrent) question but I did not found a question when searching mailing lists. How to write a list of a simple kind, e.g.: abc <- list(one=(1:2), two=(1:5)) # to a file? I understand that write() & co. cannot work but when I try sink("aa.txt", append=T, split=T) abc sink() # the output is indeed "split by rows" in the

Hi, I've been using gamm4 to build GAMMs for exploring environmental influences on genetic ancestry. Things have gone well and I have 2 very straightforward questions: 1. I've used method=REML. Am I correct that this is an alternative method for estimating the smooth functions in GAMMs rather than GCV that is often used for GAMs? I've read up on REML and it makes sense, but I'm

Hi, Duncan: On 6/29/24 17:24, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > >> ????? Yes. I'm not yet facile with "|>", but I'm learning. >> >> >> ????? Spencer Graves > > There's very little to know.? This: > > ???? x |> f() |> g() > > is just a different way of writing > > ??? g(f(x)) > > If f() or g() have extra

I am having difficulty fitting a mgcv::gamm model that includes both a random smooth term (i.e. 'fs' smooth) and autoregressive errors. Standard smooth terms with a factor interaction using the 'by=' option work fine. Both on my actual data and a toy example (below) I am getting the same error so am inclined to wonder if this is either a bug or a model that gamm is simply unable

Hi R-users, I'm using R 2.11.1, mgcv 1.6-2 to fit a generalized additive mixed model. I'm new to this package...and just got more and more problems... 1. Can I include correlation and/or random effect into gam( ) also? or only gamm( ) could be used? 2. I want to estimate the smoothing function s(x) under each level of treatment. i.e. different s(x) in each level of treatment. shall I