similar to: pam ulimit 64 bit

With the sshd in recent releases of OpenSSH, some Red Hat Linux systems complain about ulimit trying to raise a limit when logging in via ssh. The problem is that packages/redhat/sshd.pam doesn't do limit checking for an sshd session. The attached patch adds the pam_limits module to the sshd session, which checks for limits set in /etc/security/limits.conf. This works on Red Hat Linux 5.2

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301 Summary: In openssh 3.3 and 3.4 pam session seems be called from non-root Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

We were previously running 5.1 x86_64 and recently updated to 5.2 using yum. Under 5.1 we were having problems when running jobs using torque and the solution had been to add the following items to the files noted "* soft memlock unlimited" in /etc/security/limits.conf "session required pam_limits.so" in /etc/pam.d/{rsh,sshd} This changed the max

Hi, I'm trying to remove any limit on open files for a user; I've set username nofiles to unlimited in /etc/security/logins.conf, but now I get "could not open session" if I try to su to the user. singhh - nofile unlimited I think this is related to PAM, so I've modifed /etc/pam.d/su and /etc/pam.d/login to use pam_limits.so: # cat /etc/pam.d/su

I'm running fedora directory server on some boxes in a multi-master arrangement. The problem is that when dirsrv is lauched from init (on boot) the maximum number of allowed file descriptors (ulimit -n) is only 4096. That means that the slapd process can only accept ~4k connections, and it needs to accept ~10k or so. The value for nofile for all users in /etc/security/limits.conf (and

The ulimit problem appears to have reared its head again with openssh-1.2.3, under Red Hat Linux 6.1 (kernel-2.2.12, glibc-2.1.2, egcs-1.1.2, openssl-0.9.5, pam-0.68, pwdb-0.60): $ telnet localhost 22 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. SSH-1.5-OpenSSH-1.2.3 ^] telnet> quit Connection closed. $ ssh localhost Last login: Wed Mar 29

I'm using Dovecot 1.1.7 on CentOS 5.2. I've changed my passdb from passwd to pam, it works fine, but I've found this messages on /var/log/secure: dovecot-auth: PAM adding faulty module: /lib64/security/pam_limits.so dovecot-auth: PAM unable to dlopen(/lib64/security/pam_limits.so) dovecot-auth: PAM [error: /lib64/security/pam_limits.so: failed to map segment from shared object:

On 2001-10-26 at 13:35:50 Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams at ubsw.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 02:11:13PM +0200, Markus Friedl wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 10:14:21AM +1000, Damien Miller wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Ed Phillips wrote: > > > > > > > What is the reasoning behind this? Do we want to see a lastlog entry for >

Since upgrading from pre11 (aack, that was old!) to pre15, i get the following message when logging in via ssh to a box with the OpenSSH server running: ulimit: cannot raise limit: Operation not permitted I've traced this to the following command in /etc/profile: ulimit -c 1000000 It seems as if sshd is turning off core dumps for the shell session it spawns. Any idea what change

It all looks like a workarounds. I would suggest using a proper solution, such as systemd, that is present in ubuntu 16.04 by default, and where you can raise system limits per system service just by tweaking its config file. m. On 8 października 2016 at 11:37:59, Chen Wei Hsu (cwhsu1984 at gmail.com) wrote: Hi all, I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that when

Hi all, I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that when stream connection is over 1024, it get warning like this: WARN connection/_accept_connection accept() failed with error 24: Too many open files Tried these configs and reboot, it won't work! /etc/pam.d/common-session session required pam_limits.so /etc/sysctl.conf fs.file-max = 100000

On 20 Sep 2016, at 3:10, Chen Wei Hsu wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to stream for over 1k users on Ubuntu 16.04. I notice that > when > stream connection is over 1024, it get warning like this: > > WARN connection/_accept_connection accept() failed with error 24: Too > many > open files > > Tried these configs and reboot, it won't work! >

Hi, I noticed that the glusterfs client tries to set ulimit -n to 1M. When I run booster with non-privileged user, the following line appears several times in the log file: [2009-09-14 09:15:22] W [client-protocol.c:6010:init] brick-0-0-0: WARNING: Failed to set 'ulimit -n 1M': Operation not permitted When I run it with root, there's no such complaint even though

Running across some curious stuff with ulimit on CentOS 5.10. We have a non CentOS packaged version of Asterisk (using their packages) that we start at boot time with a typical RC script. Recently it started whining that it couldn't open enough file handles. As we dug further into this, it appears that at boot time, it inherits ulimit from init, which is pretty low: 1024. We've set

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301 ------- Additional Comments From ldv at altlinux.org 2002-06-27 03:09 ------- In your case, to make pam_limits work, use "ulimit -Sc 0" instead of "ulimit -c 0". ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Hi Limits: Where all working fine: core file size????????? (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size?????????? (kbytes, -d) unlimited scheduling priority???????????? (-e) 0 file size?????????????? (blocks, -f) unlimited pending signals???????????????? (-i) 257970 max locked memory?????? (kbytes, -l) 64 max memory size???????? (kbytes, -m) unlimited open files????????????????????? (-n) 65536 pipe

When restarting Dovecot 2.2.10 (via atrpms) on RHEL 6, I get the error: Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under max. load (1024 < 4096), because of default_client_limit # doveconf default_internal_user default_internal_user = dovecot Should dovecot print this warning based on $default_internal_user, or based on root? As root: # ulimit -n 1024 As user dovecot: $ ulimit -n

Commit-ID: a756665f42b1f160714039f2562868bb5ba340e0 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=a756665f42b1f160714039f2562868bb5ba340e0 Author: Christoph Mathys <eraserix at gmail.com> AuthorDate: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 17:36:01 +0800 Committer: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> CommitDate: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 15:14:32 +0200 [klibc] [BUILTIN] Add support for

Hi, perhaps this? > with new debian9: > open files (-n) 1024 Regards Urban Am 16.09.20 um 12:57 schrieb Maciej Milaszewski: > Hi > Limits: > > Where all working fine: > > core file size????????? (blocks, -c) 0 > data seg size?????????? (kbytes, -d) unlimited > scheduling priority???????????? (-e) 0 > file size?????????????? (blocks,

Why can't non-uid 0 users have more than 1024 file descriptors when logging in via ssh? I'm trying to allow a user to have a hard limit of 8192 file descriptors(system defaults to 1024) via the following setting in /etc/security/limits.conf: jdoe hard nofile 8192 But when jdoe logs in via ssh and does 'ulimit -Hn' he gets '1024' as a response. If he tries to