similar to: stange lockd issue on CentOS 4.4

Hello all, I used to use fully statically linked PHP, which I build into RPM using own-written spec-file. I need to do this as there are a lot of boxes with old linuxes (RedHat 6.2, 7, 9) which I can't upgrade to CentOS3/4 right now for a several reasons I don't want to explain here. When I've been using CentOS 4.0 and 4.1 - there were no big problems to link PHP as static executable

Greetings, centos. Looks like postinstall scriplet in CentOS4.4 distro requires /sbin/restorecon utility, which in turn resides in policycoreutils package. Meanwhile, up2date don't require policycoreutils. It seems to that there is an error in dependencies for up2date. -- Best regards, Alexey Loukianov mailto:aloukianov at lavtech.ru Software Development

Hello all, a couple of weeks ago I've been installing CentOS 4.2 on a very-old server machine with MSI server board based on Intel GX440 chipset, two Xeons 500Mhz and one 1Gig of RAM. There is an AMI MegaRaid 467 installed as a storage controller, which causes some troubles with installation, as stock CenOS4 install and production kernels doesn't have older megaraid.ko module compiled,

Hello all, today I've been sitting at work and upgrading a very-very-very old server with RedHat Linux 6.2 installed up to CentOS 3.8. The process went smoothly, as it is not the first time I was doing the things like this. Just after upgrading I went to rpm -qai list and got an interesting observation: there are at least two "tar" utilities installed on the system. One is tar, and

Dear Friends, I am using ACL for user access Internet by SQUID, but I need all users access site http://sivolks1.volkswagen.com.br:5169/indexteste.html. How do it ? Thanks for all Adriano Frare

In my fetchmail setup it will fetch only 99 mails at a time. And if the mail numbers are more than 99 it fetch up to 99 and look back same e-mails again and again. (It won't delete the fetched mails) Could someone please help me how to fix this problem? Is there any setting in the fetchmail.rc file that default number of mails to be fetched in a go is max 99 or something like that? Or is

Ferdinando Santacroce <jesus_was_rasta at yahoo.it> wrote: > I regularly extended my volume group and the logical volume where > /var stay. Now I need to umount /var to run a resize2fs to extend the Alternatively, you can use `ext2online` to resize the filesystem while it is mounted. robert

-> Is there a way to get a date stamp for the dmesg? At least on CentOS7: dmesg -T ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Hyatt" <dhyatt at dsgmail.wustl.edu> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:36:46 PM Subject: [CentOS] Lockd: failed to reclaim lock for pid ... My environment is "heterogeneous" my

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 08:57:44AM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > It seems that {rpc.}lockd no longer runs after the ino64 changes on any > of my systems after a full rebuild of src and ports. No log entries > offer any insight as to why :-( > > imb I don't tend to use NFS on my systems that are running head, so I haven't had occasion to test this as stated. However, I

My environment is "heterogeneous" my authentication and home server are currently stuck on a 1G shared network, the production servers and storage servers are on a bonded 40G network, all are in the same VLAN. I have about 100 servers on the 40GB bonded network each with 12cores and 128GB of memory. They are running centos 6.6 Except for my storage servers they are all just running

Running the nightly from two days ago. The Dovecot log shows no errors, but I keep getting login errors for a few users. top shows: 71486 user1 1 96 0 4552K 2408K lockd 0 0:00 0.00% imap 11170 user2 1 96 0 4440K 2480K lockd 0 0:00 0.00% imap And a ps aux shows that these processes have been open for hours. If I move the mbox that contains their mail, the same

ei tuka imam edin pf conf obache pravi mnogo nomera, kato se pusne parvoto koeto e dropva paketi, timeoutva po serverite i t.n.. i speed-a e mnogo baven, vijte ako nqkoi moje da otkrie generalna greshka da reply :) vapreki che ne e freebsd-specific :P ne sym go pisal az a i ne sam mnogo mnogo zapoznat s pf zatova ako nqkoi moje da pomogne e dobre doshyl :) btw moje i neshto ot tia opcii kato set

I thnk I posted this last week, but to refresh your minds (for Americans, after all the turkey): two C7 boxes, updated. box 1 is exporting directories; box 2 is not running nfs. From box 1, every minute, I get <...> kernel: lockd: server fred.local not responding, timed out Now, on box 2, fred is eth0:fred, and is one of five secondaries on eth0. When I do an ip a, it shows as the last

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33, Alan Bartlett <ajb.stxsl at googlemail.com> wrote: > The subject line for this "conversation / thread" reads: > "Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?" > The contents, however, relates to XFS & the CentOSPlus kernel. > Filipe, please take care with what you do. :-) Very sorry about that. Fixed it now. In

Environment: CentOS 4.2 (RHES4 clone) Ruby 1.8.4 Rails 1.0 I am having a small difficulty with case sensitive matching in some ruby code: f_nam_re = Regexp.new(f_nam_re_s,"x") produces these test results: The passed regexp: ^QPCCCMR[[:digit:]]$ The regexp used is: /^QPCCCMR[[:digit:]]$/i $= is false qpcccmr1 matches QPCCCMR1 matches QPCCMMR1 does not match qpCCCMR1 matches QPCCCMRC

Hi! I''m developing an application with Rails 1.2.6 and I''ve facing a weird problem. In a form, I''m using link_to_function that is aggregating a :partial, the code is as follows: <table> <thead> <tr> <th>Marca</th> <th>Porcentaje</th> <th>Objetivo Mensual</th>

Hi I am having strange problem using samba share using Linux file managers like nautilus and konquers. I can successfully mount samba share using smb://mnt/c but every time it asks for password. When I click on one folder and come back it again asks for password and that is very annoying. Pls help me Komal

Hi all, I have a SPA 1001 with DTMF set to auto. A sip.conf peer with codec alaw, ulaw, g729. I have dtmf=inband as this peer was only supporting alaw/ulaw. They just add g729, it's a GW to landline phones. A call passing through this peer give me "WARNING Inband not supported with g729, use RFC2833 instead". The call is connecting and DTMF is working. Now I'm coming back

I posted a rather lengthy message a few weeks ago. Andrew B and Jerry both responded with indications of furthers investigation required....i was wondering if anyone found anything strange because I've had to go back to 2.2.5 to support those clients and with a bit of fear of potential strange behaviour in my XP clients. Don't wish to be a pest, but you guys have done so much for our

Tom Blackwell wrote: >... >I summarized this to myself as "computed subscripts need explicit >rounding in R, but not in S". Here's the sample code which gave >me different results with R than with Splus. I no longer have >Splus available, so I can't check it again. >look <- (10 * seq(14)) - 76 >chk.1 <- seq(1420)[ 10 * (73.1 + look) ] #