similar to: function pointer question

Hy, I got the following problem when trying to build a rpart model and using everything but LOOCV. Originally, I wanted to used k-fold partitioning, but every partitioning except LOOCV throws the following warning: ---- Warning message: In nominalTrainWorkflow(dat = trainData, info = trainInfo, method = method, : There were missing values in resampled performance measures. ----- Below are some

I am trying to write a wrapper for the last example in help(cv.glm) that deals with leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV) for a logistic model. This wrapper will be used as part of a bigger program. Here is my wrapper funtion : logistic.LOOCV.err <- function( formu=NULL, data=NULL ){ cost.fn <- function(cl, pred) mean( abs(cl-pred) > 0.5 ) glmfit <- glm(

Dear all, not really a R question but: If I want to check for the classification accuracy of a LDA with previous PCA for dimensionality reduction by means of the LOOCV method: Is it ok to do the PCA on the WHOLE dataset ONCE and then run the LDA with the CV option set to TRUE (runs LOOCV) -- OR-- do I need - to compute for each 'test-bag' (the n-1 observations) a PCA

Dear List, I am having trouble with some R code I have written to perform Redundancy Analysis (RDA) on a matrix of species abundance data (Y) and a matrix of environmental data (X). RDA is a constrained form of PCA and can be thought of as a PCA of the fitted values of a regression of each variable in Y on all variables in X. For info, the first use of RDA is in: Rao, C.R, 1964. The use and

I'm trying to do a Hosmer-Lemeshow 'goodness of fit' test on my logistic regression model. I found some code here: http://sas-and-r.blogspot.com/2010/09/example-87-hosmer-and-lemeshow-goodness.html The R code is above is a little complicated for me but I'm having trouble with my answer: Hosmer-Lemeshow: p=0.6163585 le Cessie and Houwelingen test (Design library): p=0.2843620

Hi, See below I reply your message for <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2008-April/160966.html>[R] predict.glm & newdata posted on Fri Apr 4 21:02:24 CEST 2008 You say it ##works fine but it does not: if you look at the length of yhat2, you will find 100 and not 200 as expected. In fact predict(reg1, data=x2) gives the same results as predict(reg1). So I am still looking for

I have a question about passing arguments to the function f that nlm minimizes. I have no problems if I do this: x<-seq(0,1,.1) y<-1.1*x + (1-1.1) + rnorm(length(x),0,.1) fn<-function(p) { yhat<-p*x+(1-p) sum((y-yhat)^2) } out<-nlm(fn,p=1.5,hessian=TRUE) But I would like to define fn<-function(x,y,p) { yhat<-p*x+(1-p) sum((y-yhat)^2) } so

I wish to fit a dynamical model in R and I am running in a problem that requires some of your wisdom to solve. For SAS users I am searching for the equivalent of the */retain/ *statement. For people that want to read complicated explanations to help me: I have a system of two equations written as difference equations here. To boil it down. I have a dataframe with three variables y, X1, X2

Hello, I am trying to learn how to perform Multiple Regression Analysis in R. I decided to take a simple example given in this PDF: http://www.utdallas.edu/~herve/abdi-prc-pretty.pdf I created a small CSV called, students.csv that contains the following data: s1 14 4 1 s2 23 4 2 s3 30 7 2 s4 50 7 4 s5 39 10 3 s6 67 10 6 Col headers: Student id, Memory span(Y), age(X1), speech rate(X2) Now

Dear R - help, I am working on the Credit scorecard model. I am using the Logistic regression to arrive at the regression coefficients model. I want to use the Hosmer - Lemeshow test . In order to understand the use of R - language, I had referred the following URL       http://www.stat.sc.edu/~hitchcock/diseaseoutbreakRexample704.txt The related data 'diseaseoutbreak' is available

I am trying to fit a nonlinear regression model to data. There are several predictor variables and 8 parameters. I will write the model as Y ~ Yhat(theta1,...,theta8) OK, I can do this using nls() - but "only just" as there are not as many observations as might be desired. Now the problem is that we have a factor "Site" and I want to include a corresponding error

Hi to everybody. I use the following routine (i found it in the internet) to compute the Hosmer-Lemeshow test in the framework of logistic regression. hosmerlemeshow = function(obj, g=10) { # first, check to see if we fed in the right kind of object stopifnot(family(obj)$family=="binomial" && family(obj)$link=="logit") y = obj$model[[1]] # the double bracket

I know that there are two method to apply the Hosmer and Lemeshow?s. One of them is calculated based on the fixed and pre-determined cut-off points of the estimated probability of success. One of them is calculated based on the percentiles of estimated probabilities. In the previous post,i find that the Hosmer and Lemeshow?s test how to use in R. hosmerlem <- function (y, yhat, g = 10) {

Hi, I am fitting a weighted least square regression and trying to compute SSE,SST and SSReg but I am not getting SST = SSReg + SSE and I dont know what I am coding wrong. Can you help please? xnam <-colnames(X) # colnames Design Matrix fmla1 <- as.formula(paste("Y ~",paste(xnam, collapse=

I am trying to test goodness of fit for my legalistic regression using several options as shown below.  Hosmer-Lemeshow test (whose function I borrowed from a previous post), Hosmer–le Cessie omnibus lack of fit test (also borrowed from a previous post), Pearson chi-square test, and deviance test.  All the tests, except the deviance tests, produced p-values well above 0.05.  Would anyone please

Good afternoon. I would like to know if there is any function in R to do LOOCV with these classifiers: 1)SVM 2)Neural Networks 3)C4.5 ( J48) 4)KNN Thanks a lot! [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi! I was trying to implement a probit model on a dichotomous outcome variable and found that the predictions were outside the (0,1) interval that one should get. I later tried it with some simulated data with a similar result. Here is a toy program I wrote and I cant figure why I should be getting such odd predictions. x1<-rnorm(1000) x2<-rnorm(1000) x3<-rnorm(1000)

I have a data with binary response variable, repcnd (pregnant or not) and one predictor continuous variable, svl (body size) as shown below. I did Hosmer-Lemeshow test as a goodness of fit (as suggested by a kind “R-helper” previously). To test whether the predictor (svl, or body size) has significant effect on predicting whether or not a female snake is pregnant, I used the differences between

Hi all - I'm stumped by the following mdl <- glm(resp ~ . , data = df, family=binomial, offset = ofst) WORKS yhat <- predict(mdl) WORKS yhat <- predict(mdl,newdata = df) FAILS Error in drop(X[, piv, drop = FALSE] %*% beta[piv]) : subscript out of bounds I've tried without offset, quoting binomial. The offset variable ofst IS in df. Previous postings indicate possible

Hello all, I have an optimization routine that is giving me good results, but the results are not in the nice "model" format like "lm". How can I get optim results into a model so that I can use the clever 'fitted', 'residuals', and 'summary' functions? Using optim is the only way that I was able to make a model that 1) sums the betas to 1, 2)