similar to: ipsec-tools with cisco vpn client

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "ipsec-tools with cisco vpn client"

2010 Nov 03
4
Pptp vpn server
How to setup a vpn server on centos? I can't find the pptpd in any repo
2005 Nov 10
9
[OT] Corporate Firewall
Hey, The company I work for is in the market for a new firewall. Right now we're hosting all of our own stuff (on CentOS servers) behind an old checkpoint firewall. I think Checkpoint is overkill for our needs and very expensive, plus I don't like the "per-user" charges of some commercial solutions. What do you guys suggest that we upgrade to? Here are some of the
2005 Oct 31
4
VPN via PPTP and MPPE
I have set up a VPN over PPTP on a CentOS server using the DKMS module rpm dkms-0-2.0.6-3.el4 from http://centos.karan.org/el4/extras/stable/i386/RPMS/repodata/repovie w/dkms-0-2.0.6-3.el4.kb.html and kernel_ppp_mppe-0.0.5-2dkms.noarch.rpm at http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/howto-fedora- core-3.phtml. I have configured the pptpd server on Centos4 to use MS_CHAPv2, 128bit encryption and
2008 Nov 24
1
PPTP VPN server
Hi I've been using linux to give VPN access to my corporate LAN using the following software: Centos 5.2 x86 kernel 2.6.18-92.1.18.el5xen pptpd (poptop) 1.3.4 ppp 2.4.4 The Centos server has directly connected the Internet Router, on one interface (eth1) and the LAN on another (eth0) and it works as the firewall/VPN server of my LAN. It mostly works, however, if I try to connect using
2018 Mar 26
3
centos7: pptpd vpn problem: mppe_decompress[0]: FLUSHED bit not set in stateless mode!
I try to setup a PPTP VPN server on Centos 7 and from client a router Vodafone Station (Firmware 5.4.8.1.316.1.21) On c7 I have install this: [root at s-virt tmp]# rpm -q pptpd ppppptpd-1.4.0-2.el7.x86_64ppp-2.4.5- 33.el7.x86_64 and setup all file and firewall like howto say.This now is my config: /etc/pptpd.conf:option /etc/ppp/options.pptpd/etc/pptpd.conf:logwtmp/etc/pptpd.conf:localip
2012 Jul 05
5
Netbios over VPN
I am attempting to utilize BackupPC on a Fedora 14 server to backup a remote client. As I understand, it's primary mechanism for finding clients is performing a nmblookup <clientname> This works fine for computers connected to the local network. My issue is extending ?Samba's? search to encompass our other network - the point-to-point VPNs Using OpenVPN, we have a number of road
2008 Mar 17
1
VPN server and logon to Samba PDC
My goal is to make VPN access to our Samba PDC (FreeBSD 7.0) so that users can access there home shares from Windows clients. I have read the instructions at http://samba.org/ftp/unpacked/lorikeet/pppd/final-report.pdf, but I can't make it work. Don't know if is due to my lack of skills or has something to do with the Popop functionality in FreeBSD. Following the instructions, i made a
2013 Jul 02
2
multiple VPN zones
Hi, I had a look at this page which describes a single VPN zone called "vpn": http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC-2.6.html Is this the most current information? It is the top page found by Google for "shorewall ipsec" Is there any information about setting up multiple VPN zones for different classes of road warrior? E.g. lets say there are two classes of road warrior:
2004 Sep 10
1
Using Samba over VPN - shares disconnect on Windows clients
I am running Poptop 1.1.4 VPN server, Samba 3.0.6, RH 9 (2.4.20-8 patched for mppe-mppc). When the end user connects via VPN, they can create a share to the samba shared folder that was created. When they clost the explorer window, then reopen the shared drive from the "My Computer" view, the share can not be re-opened with the error that the mapped drive is alreay in use. I have
2008 Feb 20
2
Shorewall vpn and Messenger
I have installed the shorewall frontend with pptpd tunnelling server. All works fine except only one thing: When the outside users connect to my centos server to shorewall over pptpd vpn tunneling  then the client computer can''t login to live messenger, but the customer can connect perfectly with skype, use mail, internet etc... all of this program installed in their outside computers.
2005 Apr 05
1
tunneling a connection to a samba server via vpn
Hello to everyone in the list, i have a IPCop firewall with vpn service running and just one roadwarrior (xp sp2 pc), everything is fine, but when the remote pc tries to connect (or just view) to the samba file server shares there is no accessible. The other clients of the lan are all visibles. Is there any way to view and share the samba file server through the ipcop vpn or i need to setup a
2004 Aug 06
7
Site-to-site VPN with dynamic IPs
Hi All, Is it possible to establish site-to-site VPN using dynamic IP addresss assigned by ISP ? If yes, I would like to request a sample ipsec.conf for such scenario... Thanks and warmest regards aslay ################################################### # This message has been scanned for viruses and # # dangerous content by Pensteel Digital Solutions # # Open Source Security Server,
2005 Mar 15
4
simple routing protocol for VPN redundancy?
Hello all, I need a very simple routing protocol for VPN redundancy. We have several sites and each site has a Linux router and two IPCops each with an ADSL connection to the internet using different ISP''s. I have configured VPN''s between all of the sites for each IPcop on ispA and the same for the IPCops on ispB. This way, if one of the ISP fails, I change the route on the
2005 May 18
1
samba vpn pptp [the specified network name is no longer available]
hi guys, I'm having trouble accessing samba share files from a windows xp client using a vpn pptp connection. I configured samba and it works excellent on the LAN but when i connect through pptp and access the samba server \\192.168.3.1 I can see the shared folders but when i try to browse them, windows hangs (4 a change!) for a while then returns "the specified network name
2006 Sep 18
2
pptp vpn through CentOS 4.3.
Hello, We can't connect to our pptp server through our CentOS gateway with a XP client. The linux client is working but not the XP client. I know for a fact that the pptp server is not the problem because if I connect the XP machine directly to the Internet the pptp vpn is working. I know about the pptp-conntrack-nat patch, I compiled the 2.4.9 kernel, with patch-o-matic-ng-20060511.tar.bz2
2008 Jan 31
3
Controling vpn access
HĂ­ everybody, you have a nice day. I am configuring accounting in shorewall /etc/shorewall/accounting and the traffic between eth0 (local network)1, eth2(local network2) and eth3(local network3) &lt;--&gt; eth1(ip public network), works fine. I make the accounting because y want to control the remote vpn access(pptpd) throught shorewall. Which is the way to control vpn /ip/access in
2015 Nov 01
3
Openvpn and samba: play nice together?
You definetly need a TAP connection to make samba work over VPN. We use OpenVPN host2net-accounts created with IPCop here since quite a while and it works with samba without problems. However, the speed is of course not as fast as in local net, but this is rather related to the way the SMB-protocoll works. ;-) ________________________________________ Von: samba [samba-bounces at
2004 Sep 01
11
IPSEC VPN clients on local network
I have problems connecting IPSEC VPN clients on the masqueraded network to outside VPN servers. It looks like this: ipsec-user | 192.168.1.10 (DHCP assigned) | | 192.168.1.1 fw-1 (shorewall, Linux 2.6) | 20.20.20.20 (internet) | 30.30.30.30 fw-2 (IPSEC VPN endpoint) | 192.168.100.1 | | 192.168.100.2 server ipsec-user (a road warrior) is supposed to create an IPSEC tunnel to his home
2002 Dec 29
2
win98 browsing problem across VPN subnets
I have just setup a VPN connection three sites using IPCOP. Everything seems to be talking ok, apart from browsing the network neighborhood. There are no NT/Win2K/XP servers running on any of the sites, all sites are just running win98 pc's using tcp/ip. I have tried configuring all PC's to be on the same workgroup and setup sharing, but still each site can only see the pc's
2008 Aug 14
1
[OT] VPN/DMZ best practices
There is such a wealth of knowledge and personal experience on this list that I'd like to get your opinions on our current situation. Currently, we have a simple tri-homed firewall with the internal network on one interface, the dmz on another, and the dirty internet on the last. Also, there is a spare interface on the box which is unused. We use CentOS and manually maintain our rule sets