similar to: Multivariate hypergeometric distribution version of phyper()

Dear All I have a question about the hypergeomteric distribution. Example 1: I have a universe of 6187 objects, and 164 have a particular attribute, therefore 6187-164 do not have that attribute. I sample 249 of those objects, and find that 19 have that attribute. I get a p-value here (looking at just over-representation): phyper(19, 164, 6187-164, 249, lower.tail=FALSE) [1] 7.816235e-06

Hi, I hope somebody can help me on how to use the hypergeometric function. I did read through the R documentation on hypergeometric but not really sure what it means. I would like to evaluate the hypergeometric function as follows: F((2*alpha+1)/2, (2*alpha+2)/2 , alpha+1/2, betasq/etasq). I'm not sure which function should be used- either phyper or qhyper or dhyper Where

Aloha all, I know too little about what I'm about to write and hope I'm not wasting your time. For a class I'm teaching in archaeological data analysis, I'm trying to put together a routine that calculates the so-called Petersen index and, especially, confidence intervals for the index. This was introduced to archaeologists by N.R.J. Fieller and A. Turner in an article

"help" We want to estimate the number of caribou in Jasper. We recently conducted an aerial survey and saw 70 uncollared caribou and 8 of 11 collared caribou. We want to estimate the number of caribou in this population with 95% confidence limits. Gary White uses the hypergeometric distribution and determines the population estimates using maximum likelihood and 95%CL as

Dear R team, I have a simple question. I tried this command: phyper(17,449,19551,181, FALSE) [1] 1.47295e-07 and then I tried this command: (fisher.test(matrix(c(17,449,181,19551),2,2), alternative='greater'))$p.value [1] 3.693347e-06 Shouldn't be identical the results of the two commands ? What is the difference ? Thx a lot -- View this message in context:

I'm going to use dhyper(x, m, n, k) to get a 95% coverage. Let me use an example to explain my problem: Suppose I have a urn containing 90 red and 10 black balls. Now I wanna remove 3 from the urn. By the following codes: m<-90;n<-10;k<-3; x<-0:3 dhyper(x,m,n,k) I can obtain the probability that 0,1,2,3 red balls will be removed. 0.000742115 0.025046382 0.247680891

Hello! I use R-version 1.0.0 To get the 0.95 quantile of the hypergeometric distribution with the parameters m=45000,n=5000 and k=600 I use the R-command > qhyper(0.95,45000,5000,600). The value obtained is 600. However, the true value is 552. The latter can be obtained for example by calling the corresponding distribution function with the R commands > x<-540:580 >

Last night I sent the bug report below to r-help. I have since then looked at dhyper.c and found: if (NR < 0 || NB < 0 || n <= 0 || n > N) DOMAIN_ERROR; I changed 'n <= 0' to 'n < 0' and then dhyper worked as I wanted. Am I introducing some potentially dangerous behaviour by this change? Goran

Dear R Users, There exists a non-central hypergeometric distribution function in the (MCMCpack) package, and a hypergeometric distribution function in the (stats) package. Is there a function for sampling from an extended hypergeometric distribution? Thanks, Narcyz This message is intended for the addressee named and may con...{{dropped}}

Is there any way to know how the "dmvt" function computes the hypergeometric function needed in the calculation for the density of multivariate t distribution? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/hypergeometric-function-in-mvtnorm-tp4483730p4483730.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Dear list, I have performed several tests for the hypergeometric distribution using phyper() for some gene annotation categories as follows >phyper(26,830,31042,337, lower.tail=F) >phyper(16,387,31042,337, lower.tail=F) . . . I am only running some selected categories but I would like to correct this value for multiple testing since I have 3121 possible tests according to 3121

In both versions of R to which I currently have access (R-0.16.1 and R-0.61.1), "phyper" stops returning correct cumulative probabilities as the parameters of the hypergeometric distribution get large. For example, when N1=1345, N2=1055, and n=1330, phyper returns either 0 or 1, and nothing in between. Looking at phyper.c, it's clear what's happening. First a term (called

Hello. Somebody knows how to compute generalized hypergeometric series in R? (see http://functions.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunctions/HypergeometricPFQ/02/ to understand what I mean) Thanks in advance, Arnau.

Dear All, I am looking for an implementation in R of the Appell Hypergeometric function. Any suggestions will be more than appreciated! GP -- dr. Giovanni Parrinello External Lecturer Medical Statistics Unit Department of Biomedical Sciences Viale Europa, 11 - 25123 Brescia Italy Tel: +390303717528 Fax: +390303717488 email: parrinel at med.unibs.it

I have been reading, in various sources, that a poisson distribution is related to binomial, extending the idea to include numbers of events in a given period of time. In my case, the hypergeometric distribution seems more appropriate, but I need a temporal dimension to the distribution. I have weekly samples of two kinds of events: call them A and B. I have a count of A events. These change

A cut and paste typo has crept in and is rendering all values returned for the hypergeometric distribution incorrect. The problem is in src/main/arithmetic.c in the function "math4". The lines PROTECT(sy = allocVector(REALSXP, n)); a = REAL(sa); b = REAL(sb); c = REAL(sc); d = REAL(sc); /* <-- change this line */ y = REAL(sy); should

Hi all, I have tried to compute a p-value for a hypergeometric distribution as: dhyper(x,k,l,n) + phyper(x,k,l,n,lower.tail=FALSE) and sometimes obtained negative values. Do you know if it is because a round error or am I doing something wrong? Thanks in advance, Aurora

Full_Name: Utz J. Pape Version: 2.2.0 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (141.14.23.12) If I use phyper and set parameter x equal to k (meaning that all balls I draw are white) phyper returns 1 which is not (always) correct: pape at xxx:~> R2.2.0 --vanilla R : Copyright 2005, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 2.2.0 (2005-10-06 r35749) ISBN 3-900051-07-0 R is free software

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

For those who are interested, I have made available a R function for noncentral hypergeometric distribution at http://www.geocities.com/jg_liao/software/Hypergeometric/hypergeometric_in_R.txt The paper that describes the algorithm will appear in The American Statistician. The function does not run on S-plus as the R's scoping rule is used. Here is how the function can be used: > n1