similar to: Store the model built and Using the same on a later date.

Hi all Apologies if this is a trivial question- I have searched the lists and the online help files etc but have not managed to find anything. I recently downloaded the latest version of R, which has the help type set to htmlhelp as default (according to http://127.0.0.1:18380/library/utils/html/help.html) I would very much like to be able to access the help files when I am offline by typing

Folks, I have a very basic question. The solution eludes me perhaps because of my own lack of creativity. I am not attaching a fully reproducible session because the issue may well be becuase of the way the data file is, and the data file is large (and I don't know whether I can legally distribute it). If people can suggest things that might be wrong in my data or the way that I am reading it,

Hi all I’m in desperate need of help. I’m working with a grouped data object, called Orthodont in the nlme package in R, and am trying to fit various models (learning methods for my thesis), but one of the variables in the object is numeric, (age) and I need it to be a factor. I’ve tried: as.factor(Orthodont$age) as.factor(as.character(Orthodont$age)) and various other things, but when I then

Hi, Although my doubt is pretty,as i m not from stats background i am not sure how to proceed on this. Currently i am doing a forecasting.I used ARIMA to forecast and time series was volatile i used garchFit for residuals. How to use the output of Garch to correct the forecasted values from ARIMA. Here is my code: ###delta is the data fit<-arima(delta,order=c(2,,0,1)) fit.res <-

Hi all, I want peer-peer communication between two clients (soft phones) both are behind NAT.I have an accounts with SIP proxy for two clients. To communicate these two clients do i need to use Asterisk ? As per my understanding Asterisk acts like Gateway where conventional phone calls data transfer into internet voice calls. If am wrong please correct me . Thanks, Raghav.

Hello Marc, Upgrade DNS worked properly as you can see below. --------- samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information DNS accounts already exist No zone file /usr/local/samba/private/dns/EXZA.LOCAL.zone # is this the culprit? DNS records will be automatically created DNS partitions already exist dns-dc account already exists See

Hello Rowland, ldap search command throws error as below. I am unable to search ldap. ------- ldap_initialize( ldap://dc.exza.local:3268 ) ldap_start_tls: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) Enter LDAP Password: ldap_sasl_bind(SIMPLE): Can't contact LDAP server (-1) ---------- I am using BIND_DLZ dns back end. and server is listening on 3268 and 3269 -- Thanks & Regards, Anantha

Hi, this post is about foreach operators, the compiler package and the last update of doMC that includes support for the compiler functionality. I am using a home-made %dopar%-like operator that adds some custom expression to be executed before the foreach loop expression itself (see sample code below). It used to work perfectly with doMC 1.2.1, but with the introduction of the compiler

Hi all, I want to two sip clients connect through Asterisk in local network for testing. My sip.conf file looks like this [general] context=internal allowguest=no allowoverlap=no bindport=5060 bindaddr=0.0.0.0 srvlookup=no disallow=all allow=ulaw alwaysauthreject=yes canreinvite=no nat=yes session-timers=refuse localnet=192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 [7001] type=friend host=dynamic

Hi, We provide DC Host's IP address and port as 3268 and user DN of administrator as CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=ktkbank,DC=com and supply password. But proxy reports "unable to connect to directory". However, the Proxy's Content Gateway is a member of AD DC and it uses integrated windows authentication. -- Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava DISCLAIMER: This

Hello, I have several low priority UBSan questions... (1) Is there a way for UBSan to print its output to a file that the user specified (e.g. via option) instead of dumping everything on stderr? (2) Out of curiosity, why is the name of the option for printing the stacktrace spelled "UBSAN_OPTIONS=print_stacktrace=1", though the allowed value is 1? Since the only one value is

See attached some quick slides (backup from the dev meeting talk) about the pass pipeline. -- Mehdi Le mer. 11 avr. 2018 à 12:18, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> a écrit : > > > Le mer. 11 avr. 2018 à 11:20, <katya.romanova at sony.com> a écrit : > >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> >> *Sent:*

Hi Mehdi, Awesome! It’s a very clear design. The only question left is which pipeline to choose for unified compile-phase optimization pipeline. - ThinLTO compile-phase pipeline? It might very negatively affect compile-time and the memory footprint for FullLTO link-phase. That was the reason why so many optimization were moved from the link-phase to the parallel compile-phase for FullLTO

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Le mar. 10 avr. 2018 à 23:18, <katya.romanova at sony.com> a écrit : > >> Hi Mehdi, >> >> >> >> Awesome! It’s a very clear design. The only question left is which >> pipeline to choose for unified compile-phase optimization pipeline. >> >> -

Hi, suppose you have two versions of the same algorithm: one in pure R, the other one in C/C++ called via .Call(). Assuming there is no bug in the implementations (i.e. they both do the same thing), is there any well known reason why the C/C++ implementation could return numerical results non identical to the one obtained from the pure R code? (e.g. could it be rounding errors? please

Hello, We have running lustre 1.8.1 and have met "No space lest on device" error when uploading 500 Gb small files (less then 100 Kb each). The problem seems to depends on the number of files. If we remove one file, we can create one new file, even with Gb size; but if we haven''t remove something we can''t create even very little file, as an example using touch

Le mar. 10 avr. 2018 à 23:18, <katya.romanova at sony.com> a écrit : > Hi Mehdi, > > > > Awesome! It’s a very clear design. The only question left is which > pipeline to choose for unified compile-phase optimization pipeline. > > - ThinLTO compile-phase pipeline? It might very negatively affect > compile-time and the memory footprint for FullLTO link-phase.

From: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 11:53 PM To: Romanova, Katya <katya.romanova at sony.com> Cc: David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>; Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google.com>; llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] exploring possibilities for unifying ThinLTO and FullLTO frontend + initial optimization

Hi, It is non trivial to recompute summaries (which is why we have summaries in the bitcode in the first place by the way), because bitcode is expensive to load. I think shipping two different variant of the bitcode, one with and one without summaries isn't providing much benefit while complicating the flow. We could achieve what you're looking for by revisiting the flow a little. I

Hi David, Thank you so much for your reply! >> You're dealing with a situation where you are shipped BC files offline and then do one, or multiple builds with these BC files? Yes, that’s exactly the case. >> If the scenario was more like a naive build: Multiple BC files generated on a single (multi-core/threaded) machine (but some Thin, some >> Full) & then fed to the