similar to: a "simple" statistic question

Hello everyone, We are in the middle of porting the majority of zorg to GitHub/monorepo. The following build factories will be ported and if you use one of those for your bots, you are all covered: * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeBuildFactory (31 bots) * ClangBuilder.getClangCMakeGCSBuildFactory (2 bots) * LibcxxAndAbiBuilder (23 bots) * SphinxDocsBuilder (7 bots) * UnifiedTreeBuilder (11

Hello build bot owners! The staging master is ready. Please feel free to use it to make sure your bots would work well with the monorepo and github. The following builders could be configured to build monorepo: * clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel * clang-native-arm-lnt-perf * clang-cmake-armv7-lnt * clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon * clang-cmake-armv7-quick * clang-cmake-armv7-global-isel *

Hello, Some of our AArch64 bots have started timing out while compiling SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/AArch64/aarch64_neon_intrinsics. On clang-cmake-aarch64-quick the failure first appears between r275337 and r275351, and on clang-cmake-aarch64-full it appears after r275352, so there's isn't a clear culprit for this. I suspect we have been slowly approaching that threshold for a while.

Hi Galina, It seems that our libcxx bots are now triggering builds for any changes to llvm: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux/builds/2434 Should I file a bug report for this? Thanks, Diana On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 11:36, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > The staging master is

I think what she is referring to was that the build seemed to be triggered by a commit to a project that shouldn't trigger builds on a libcxx bot (i.e. the change was in llvm). I have a somewhat orthogonal but related question. In the past, commits to compiler-rt did not trigger builds on llvm/clang/sanitizer bots. Has this behaviour been rectified with the move to github? I am really sorry

Hope this should be simple: I have a User model and a Role model. Factories for each. When I create a User using FG, I want to assign a specific role. Cant seem to figure out how to do this, getting errors like: uninitialized constant SysadminRole for doing things this way: Factory.define :user do |u| u.practice_id { |a| a.association(:practice).id } u.password ''password1''

Is there a way to preload common data made by factory_girl to speed up tests instead of recreating these common data at the beginning of every test. For example, I want to have 10 users premade at the beginning of every test. I found this http://agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins/factory_data_preloader But the page says that this plugin does not "play nice" with autotest. But I use

On Thu, 5 Jul 2007, David Greene wrote: >>> We should just keep the existing constructor, so this isn't a problem. >>> These clients don't have the "dereference end" problem. >> >> Duh. >> >> Yep, ok, this sounds good. > > Grr. That's no so easy either, because it conflicts with the one-argument > specialized constructor.

Hello, I wanted to know how to load dummy data in the application using Factory girl. I had done this using Fixtures.I had made a fixtures folder into the test folder and run the command "rake test fixtures:load" Currently i tried using factories in the spec which is working fine. Wanted to know know regarding loading dummy data. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Here''s my issue: running ruby -I test test/unit/something_test.rb for each of my unit tests works perfectly. However, running rake test:units brings errors in all of them - some object becomes nil for some reason. Why might this be happening? Specifics: the object that is successfully not nil when I run the unit tests one-by-one but becomes nil when I do rake test:units is defined like

Hi guys, I''m using RSpec with Capybara, and for that I created the spec/integration folder. But when I execute the command "bundle exec rspec spec" RSpec don''t execute my files on integration folder. I need to pass each file to solve this problem. Do you known how I can put the integration folder on rspec execution path without need to pass each file? Thanks, Pablo

I intentionally deleted the attribute author from the table comments. When I used functional testing, I got the following message ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: PGError: ERROR: column "author" of relation "comments" does not exist What should I need to do in order to avoid this error message!!! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

On 9/13/2017 9:21 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > ...The SATA hard drives....[It doesn't matter the brand.. they get built with the same tech and at the same place these days.] thats most assuredly not true.?? HD manufacturing is extremely competitive, there's no WAY they 'are built at the same place'. Each of the few remaining major brands of HD's has their own

Hello, I'm not exactly sure how to ask this question, but let me give it a shot... Is it possible (easy) to use Rcpp Modules in conjunction with object factories? For example what I am trying to do is something like this: // c++ classes class Foo { public: void do_something() {}; }; class Foo_Factory { public: Foo * create_foo() { return new Foo(); } }; ## R Code

Dear, I have a table with four columns similar to the following: Factory Name Production type Months Freq Factory 1 Car type 1 Jan. 0 Factory 1 Car type 2 Feb. 1 Factory 2 Car type 3 May 3 I need help in producing graphs; 1. I

On Thursday 05 July 2007 11:54, Chris Lattner wrote: > > I've opted for the alternate approach: make all clients pass iterators. > > That is, get rid of the specialized one- and two-argument constructors > > entirely. > That sounds reasonable. Please keep the "Value* + num elements" ctor as > well though. Why? I can't think of a case where a client

Hi, i''m getting the following error when running a spec on my controller for my Equipment model. it "edit action should render edit template" do get :edit, :id => Factory(:equipment) response.should render_template(:edit) end Failure/Error: get :edit, :id => Factory(:equipment) ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: Validation failed: The test

Hey, can somebody tell me why my test database is always empty after I run "rake test" but not after I test single test files? My rake db:seed for the test database takes like 6 minutes and I don''t really wanna reseed it every time I run "rake test". Is it possible to not let "rake test" truncate my database? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --

Hello all, I''m having some issues with my test fixtures and unit tests and am hoping somebody has an idea about how to fix it. Background: I have a table in my legacy database called tp_approval_step. For this table I have a fixture called tp_approval_step.yml I have a model called ApprovalProcessStep that uses set_table_name ''tp_approval_step'' In my test file,

I am working my way through Agile web development with rails and I''m in the testing chapter. when I run the following test(or any other test) I''m new and not sure where to start looking. require ''test_helper'' class ProductTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase # Replace this with your real tests. test "the truth" do assert true end end I