similar to: Applying SVM model to a new data

Hello, I have an SVM model previously calibrated using libsvm R implementation from the e1071 package. I would like to use this SVM to predict values, from a Java program. I first tried to use jlibsvm and the "standard" java implementation of libsvm, without success. Thus, I am now considering writing data in files from my Java code, calling an R program to predict values, then gather

Hi, I have a question about the parameter C (cost) in svm function in e1071. I thought larger C is prone to overfitting than smaller C, and hence leads to more support vectors. However, using the Wisconsin breast cancer example on the link: http://planatscher.net/svmtut/svmtut.html I found that the largest cost have fewest support vectors, which is contrary to what I think. please see the scripts

Hi, I ran two svm models in R e1071 package: the first without cross-validation and the second with 10-fold cross-validation. I used the following syntax: #Model 1: Without cross-validation: > svm.model <- svm(Response ~ ., data=data.df, type="C-classification", > kernel="linear", cost=1) > predict <- fitted(svm.model) > cm <- table(predict,

Hi, I ran two svm models in R e1071 package: the first without cross-validation and the second with 10-fold cross-validation. I used the following syntax: #Model 1: Without cross-validation: > svm.model <- svm(Response ~ ., data=data.df, type="C-classification", > kernel="linear", cost=1) > predict <- fitted(svm.model) > cm <- table(predict,

I am accustomed to the LIBSVM package, which provides cross-validation on training with the -v option % svm-train -v 5 ... This does 5 fold cross validation while building the model and avoids over-fitting. But I don't see how to accomplish that in the e1071 package. (I learned that svm(... cross=5 ...) only _tests_ using cross-validation -- it doesn't affect the training.) Can

Dear R Community- I am a new user of support vector machines for species distribution modeling and am using package e1071 to run svm() and predict.svm(). Briefly, I want to create an svm model for classification of a factor response (species presence or absence) based on climate predictor variables. I have used a training dataset to train the model, and tested it against a validation data set

Dear David, Dear R Users , Suppose that we want to regress for example a certain autoregressive model using SVM. We have our data and also some fixed kernels in libSVM behinde e1071 in front. The question: Where can we insert our certain autoregressive model ? During creating data frame ? Or perhaps we can make a relationship between our variables ended to desired autoregressive model ?

Hello I am playing around trying to bootstrap an svm model using a training set and a test set. I've written another function, auc, which I call here, and am bootstrapping. I did this successfully with logistic regression, but I am getting an error from the starred ** line which I determined with print statements. How do I tune an svm in a bootstrap? I can't find sample code

Dear R users, Thanks in advance. I am Deb, Statistician at NSW Department of Commerce, Sydney. I am using R 2.9.1 on Windows XP. This has reference to the package “MCMCpack”. My objective is to select a better model using various alternatives. I have provided here an example code from MCMCpack.pdf. The matrix of Bayes Factors is: model1 model2 model3 model1 1.000 14.08

Hi, If I try to read the codes of functions in e1071 package, it gives me following error message. >library(e1071) > svm function (x, ...) UseMethod("svm") <environment: namespace:e1071> > predict.svm Error: Object "predict.svm" not found > Can someone help me on this how to read the codes of the functions in the e1071 package? Thanks. Raj

Hello all, I'm working with the svm (libsvm) implementation from library(e1071). Currently I'm trying to extend recursive feature elimination (R-SMV) to work with multiclass classification. My problem is that if I run svm for a 3 class problem I get a 2-D vector back from model$coefs, can someone explain me what this values are? I understand them in the 2-class problem where this is a

Hello all, I've become confused by the output produced by a call to anova(model1,model2). First a brief background. My model used to predict final tree height is summarised here: Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) Treatment 2 748.35 374.17 21.3096 7.123e-06 *** HeightInitial 1 0.31 0.31 0.0178 0.89519

Hi, I'm trying to compare models, one of which has all parameters fixed using offsets. The log-likelihoods seem reasonble in all cases except the model in which there are no free parameters (model3 in the toy example below). Any help would be appreciated. Cheers, Jarrod x<-rnorm(100) y<-rnorm(100, 1+x) model1<-lm(y~x) logLik(model1) sum(dnorm(y, predict(model1),

Hello, I want to understand how to tell if a model is significant. For example I have vectX1 and vectY1. I seek first what model is best suited for my vectors and then I want to know if my result is significant. I'am doing like this: model1 <- lm(vectY1 ~ vectX1, data= d), model2 <- nls(vectY1 ~ a*(1-exp(-vectX1/b)) + c, data= d, start = list(a=1, b=3, c=0)) aic1 <- AIC(model1)

Dear David, Dear Friends, After any running svm I receive different results of Error estimation of 'svm' using 10-fold cross validation. What is the reason ? It is caused by the algorithm, libsvm , e1071 or something els? Which value can be optimal one ? How much run can reach to the optimality.And finally, what is difference between Error estimation of svm using 10-fold cross validation

Hello, I have a simple theorical question about regresion... Let's suppose I have this: Model 1: Y = B0 + B1*X1 + B2*X2 + B3*X3 and Model 2: Y = B0 + B2*X2 + B3*X3 I.E. Model1 = lm(Y~X1+X2+X3) Model2 = lm(Y~X2+X3) The Ajusted R-Square for Model1 is 0.9 and the Ajusted R-Square for Model2 is 0.99, among many other significant improvements. And I want to do the anova test to choose the best

I am starting to use svm from e1071 and I wonder how exactly crossvalidation is implemented. Whenever I run > svm.model <- svm(y ~ ., data = trainset, cross = 3) on my data I get dirrerent values for svm.model$MSE e.g. [1] 0.9517001 1.7069627 0.6108726 [1] 0.3634670 0.9165497 1.4606322 This suggests to me that data are scrambled each time - the last time I looked at libsvm python

Hello, We have written a program (below) to model the effect of a covariate on observed values of a response variable (using only 80% of the rows in our dataframe) and then use that model to calculate predicted values for the remaining 20% of the rows. Then, we compare the observed vs. predicted values using a linear model and inspect that model's coefficients and its R2 value. We wish

Dear All: Just fixed where is the problem I am trying to use the R function "svm" with "type~." , but I got the following error message SVM.Model1 <- svm(type ~ ., data=my.data.x1x2y, *type='C-classification'*, kernel='linear',scale=FALSE) *Error in eval(predvars, data, env) : object 'type' not found* I am wondering if I should install a

Dear All: I am trying to use the R function "svm" with "type =C-classification" , but I got the following error message SVM.Model1 <- svm(type ~ ., data=my.data.x1x2y, *type='C-classification'*, kernel='linear',scale=FALSE) *Error in eval(predvars, data, env) : object 'type' not found* I am wondering if I should install a specific R