similar to: mboost: Interpreting coefficients from glmboost if center=TRUE

I'm running R 2.10.1 with mboost 2.0 in order to build predictive models . I am performing prediction on a binomial outcome, using a linear function (glmboost). However, I am running into some confusion regarding centering. (I am not aware of an mboost-specific mailing list, so if the main R list is not the right place for this topic, please let me know.) The boost_control() function allows

Dear useRs, we are happy to announce the release of mboost 2.0-0 on CRAN: http://cran.r-project.org/package=mboost This version contains major updates and changes to the implementation of the main algorithm. Some slight changes to the user-interface where necessary. Please consult the manual and the list of CHANGES below. The package 'mboost' (Model-based Boosting) implements

Dear useRs, we are happy to announce the release of mboost 2.0-0 on CRAN: http://cran.r-project.org/package=mboost This version contains major updates and changes to the implementation of the main algorithm. Some slight changes to the user-interface where necessary. Please consult the manual and the list of CHANGES below. The package 'mboost' (Model-based Boosting) implements

I'm getting started in R, and I'm trying to use one of the gradient boosting packages, mboost. I'm already installed the package with install.packages("mboost") and loaded it with library(mboost). My problem is that when I attempt to call glmboost, I get a message that " Error in glmboost() : no applicable method for "glmboost" ". Does anybody have

Hi, I use a mboost model to predict my dependent variable on new data. I get the following warning message: In bs(mf[[i]], knots = args$knots[[i]]$knots, degree = args$degree, : some 'x' values beyond boundary knots may cause ill-conditioned bases The new predicted values are partly negative although the variable in the training data ranges from 3 to 8 on a numeric scale. In order to

Dear useRs, I am struggling to use gamboost function form the 'mboost' package. More precisely, I am trying to extract the *partial fit* for each of the covariates estimated in a model and I usually end up with this annoying: "Error in newdata[[xname]] : subscript out of bounds ". I hope that the lack of details in my query can be straightforwardly compensated by examining the

Hi all, First of all, I'm a novice R user (less that a week), so perhaps my code isn't very efficient. Using the MBoost package I created a model using the following command and saved it to a file for later use: model <- gamboost(fpfm,data=SampleClusterData,baselearner="bbs") # Creating a model save(model,file="model.RData") # Saving a model After this, during a

I'm attempting to fit boosted regression trees to a censored response using IPCW weighting. I've implemented this through two libraries, mboost and gbm, which I believe should yield models that would perform comparably. This, however, is not the case - mboost performs much better. This seems odd. This issue is meaningful since the output of this regression needs to be implemented in a

I am having trouble predicting new data with a model created from package mboost: > mb1<-glmboost(as.formula(formula1),data=data_train,control=boost_control(mstop=400,nu=.1)) > f.predict<-predict(mb1,newdata=data_train) Error in scale.default(X, center = cm, scale = FALSE) : length of 'center' must equal the number of columns of 'x' Ultimately I want to predict

Dear all, I am puzzled by R's memory usage when calling the blackboost function from package mboost to estimate a Gradient boosting model on a simulated dataset with 20 correlated variables and 100,000 obs. The blackboost object created by the function is only 15.3Mb, but R's memory usage increases by about 3.9Gb during the estimation of the model and the memory is not released even after

New major versions of the caret packages (caret 3.37, caretLSF 1.23 and caretNWS 0.23) have been uploaded to CRAN. caret is a package for building and evaluating a wide variety of predictive models. There are functions for pre-processing, tuning models using resampling, visualizing the results, calculating performance and estimating variable importance. caretNWS and caretLSF are two parallel

New major versions of the caret packages (caret 3.37, caretLSF 1.23 and caretNWS 0.23) have been uploaded to CRAN. caret is a package for building and evaluating a wide variety of predictive models. There are functions for pre-processing, tuning models using resampling, visualizing the results, calculating performance and estimating variable importance. caretNWS and caretLSF are two parallel

New versions of the caret (3.08) and caretLSF (1.12) packages have been released. caret (short for "Classification And REgression Training") aims to simplify the model building process. The package has functions for data splitting, pre-processing and model tuning, as well as other miscellaneous functions. In the new versions: - The elasticnet and the lasso (from the enet package)

New versions of the caret (3.08) and caretLSF (1.12) packages have been released. caret (short for "Classification And REgression Training") aims to simplify the model building process. The package has functions for data splitting, pre-processing and model tuning, as well as other miscellaneous functions. In the new versions: - The elasticnet and the lasso (from the enet package)

mboost contains a blackboost method to build tree-based boosting models. I tried to write my own "cost-sensitive" ada family. But obviously my understanding to implement ngradient, loss, and offset functions is not right. I would greatly appreciate if anyone can help me out, or show me how to write a cost-sensitive family, thanks! Follows are some families I wrote ngradient <-

I just upgraded to Ubuntu 8.10 (i386) from 8.04. After the upgrade, I ran update.packages(.libPaths()[1]) in R to get the packages installed from source up to date too. Unfortunately, two packages could not be updated: mclust and mboost. In both cases, the error I got mentioned lf77blas. Here's the output for mboost: * Installing *source* package 'mboost' ... ** libs gcc -std=gnu99

Some time ago I came across the function object.size() to estimate the size of an R object. I don't know if the behavior of the function is intended to be quite "user unfriendly" as it is right now or if just nobody was thinking/caring about it. I have two suggestions to improve it: - Why is it named object.size() and not just size()? The latter would be far more intuitive and

Just having read the nice review article on boosting in the latest "Statistical Science", I would love to reproduce some of the plots inside that article, but it is not clear to me how to create the partial contribution plots for the Poisson regression. Does anyone have example code for this ? (The vignette does not offer it, I think) Thanks ! Markus [[alternative HTML version

Hi all, I am currently updating our package gamboostLSS which depends on package mboost *and* on package gamlss.dist. From mboost we use a lot of the fitting infrastructure and from gamlss.dist we obtain the relevant loss functions (aka families) used for fitting and corresponding quantile functions. Furthermore, we use the Family() function from package mboost. However, if I depend on both

Hi UseRs - I am new to R, and could use some help making out-of-sample predictions using a boosting model (the mboost command). The issue is complicated by the fact that I have panel data (time by country), and am estimating the model separately for each country. FYI, this is monthly data and I have 1986m1 - 2009m12 for 9 countries. To give you a flavor of what I am doing, here is a simple