similar to: Problem with package fpc

Hello all. I wish to run k-means with "manhattan" distance. Since this is not supported by the function "kmeans", I turned to the "pam" function in the "fpc" package. Yet, when I tried to have the algorithm run with different starting points, I found that pam ignores and keep on starting the algorithm from the same starting-points (medoids). For my

Author: schwartz Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: f5f3bfec5aa8a6e68f91ded399aa52be0424cd76 Log message: 6390254 fpc shouldn''t clutter sun4v unix with specialized hypervisor definitions 6390258 fpc should use hypervisor versioning APIs when available 6393704 pcitool dumps core with invalid options 6396857 fpc module causes boot-time panic on non-fire pcie hostbridge 6402441 sun4v

rendercheck -f a8r8g8b8 passes as much as on a GK208, and xv appears to work. Very lightly tested. Instead of sticking coordinates into pushbufs, the vertex shader is modified to read them from a constbuf, indexed by vertex id. This approach could be used for all nvc0 generations, but I didn't want to rock the boat. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Note: this

Removed explicit depar instructions as they're not used by the blob anymore. Signed-off-by: Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> --- src/shader/exac8nv110.fp | 5 ++--- src/shader/exac8nv110.fpc | 10 ++++------ src/shader/exacanv110.fp | 5 ++--- src/shader/exacanv110.fpc | 10 ++++------ src/shader/exacmnv110.fp | 5 ++--- src/shader/exacmnv110.fpc | 10 ++++------

This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. rendercheck tests seem consistent with/without this patch. I haven't extensively tested them though. Trello: https://trello.com/c/6LPB2EIS/174-update-maxwell-shaders-with-proper-delays Signed-off-by: Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> --- src/shader/exac8nv110.fp | 10 +++++----- src/shader/exac8nv110.fpc | 18

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Perhaps there was a day when those were different, but that day is not today. src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_context.c | 1 - src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nv30_context.h | 1 - src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nvfx_fragprog.c | 20 ++++++++++---------- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv30/nvfx_vertprog.c | 8 ++++---- 4

Hi, On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > BTW, you can drop those explicit "depbar" ops. I think they're only > needed when you're doing something weird with barriers. Blob doesn't > use them (anymore) > Gotcha. Should I remove them in the same patch or a different one? It seems like the depbar removal is

v2: Add missing delays This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. rendercheck tests seem consistent with/without this patch. I haven't extensively tested them though. Trello: https://trello.com/c/6LPB2EIS/174-update-maxwell-shaders-with-proper-delays Signed-off-by: Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> --- src/shader/exac8nv110.fp | 10 +++++-----

-------------------------------------------------- From: "Ahoussou Sylvie" <sylvie.ahoussou at antilles.inra.fr> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 9:48 AM To: "Thomas Lumley" <tlumley at u.washington.edu> Subject: Re: [R] Complex sampling survey _ Use of survey package > Thanks for your answer > > I think I made a mistake when I recopied the 5 first rows of

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: > Nice work! > > See my comments below, and double-check if some of them can be applied to > the shaders I didn't review yet. > > I recommend you to test your work because if one sched code is wrong, you > are likely going to kill your card and reboot your box. :-) > > >

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/07/2017 06:58 PM, Aaryaman Vasishta wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Samuel Pitoiset < >> samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com <mailto:samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Nice work! >> >> See my

v4: Updated the wait dependancy bars based on tex component masks. This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. Tested with rendercheck -f a8r8g8b8. I am still wondering whether the rd's are required. We could still wait on the write bars instead. eg. see "sched (st 0xf wr 0x1 wt 0x2) (st 0xf wr 0x1 wt 0x2) (st 0xf)" in exacmnv110.fp Trello:

hi there, whenever i try the clusterwise regression from the fpc package, there occurs the following problem: the first cluster is always designed in a way, that when i run a normal linear regression on the independent variables to describe the dependent variable (only on those respondents from the first cluster) - then the regression uses only one independent variable that describes the whole

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- src/shader/Makefile | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/shader/Makefile b/src/shader/Makefile index 46658e9..2d789be 100644 --- a/src/shader/Makefile +++ b/src/shader/Makefile @@ -24,20 +24,21 @@ NVF0_SHADERS = xfrm2nvf0.vpc \ videonvf0.fpc SHADERS = $(NVC0_SHADERS)

Running the function below, tested using the cardiff dataset from splancs generates the following error. What changes do I need to make to get the function to work? Thanks. --Dale > gen.rpoints(events, poly, 99) > rpoints Error: object "rpoints" not found # test spatial data library(splancs) data(cardiff) attach(cardiff) str(cardiff) events <- as.points(x,y) ###

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: > Looks reasonable, some minor comments below. > > > On 10/16/2016 02:06 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> diff --git a/src/nvc0_exa.c b/src/nvc0_exa.c >> index 6add60b..a53dfe6 100644 >> --- a/src/nvc0_exa.c >> +++ b/src/nvc0_exa.c >> @@ -914,14 +914,56 @@

Hello everybody I don't understand how I'm supposed to use svydesign caracteristics to explain to R that my sampling design is the following one Data base = tab1 here are the five first rows of the database (nrow = 11792) num esp Quarters Totcat Totshp Totgt Tbtpos fpc1 Totanim Id_An 10 2045 G

Dear all, I have been using the contrast library in my teaching for the last couple of years and am right in the middle of this year's round. In the last week R has been updated to version 2.14.0 on our computers. This has had the unfortunate effect of meaning the contrasts library no longer works, as the Design library is no longer available. I wonder if anyone has a fix for this...or

Hi, this is to announce a new version (1.1-2) of my package fpc. Apart from the stuff already present in the older version (methods for fixed point clustering and clusterwise regression, somewhat bug-cleaned and with faster examples) there is now a function cluster.stats, which computes some distance-based statistics often used for cluster validation, description and decision about the number of

Hi, this is to announce a new version (1.1-2) of my package fpc. Apart from the stuff already present in the older version (methods for fixed point clustering and clusterwise regression, somewhat bug-cleaned and with faster examples) there is now a function cluster.stats, which computes some distance-based statistics often used for cluster validation, description and decision about the number of