similar to: How shall one present LRT test statistic in a scientific journal ?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "How shall one present LRT test statistic in a scientific journal ?"

2010 Jun 09
1
ls -lrt reversal
My CentOS box with: $ uname -r 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 gets the file order wrong with: ls -lrt * . Two files that were last modified in the same second are shown in order that is the reverse of the order in which they were actually last modified. Note also that the later file was first created after the earlier file was last modified. Is the precision of this only to the second? Mike.
2016 Jan 23
1
microbench (benchmark_residual) requires -lrt for clock_gettime()
On my setup with glibc-2.8, benchmark_residual linkage fails with undefines references to clock_gettime(). Adding -lrt fixes that. The following is a small patch for it. Regards. -- O.S. diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 993ac33..392485e 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -437,6 +437,11 @@ if test x$enable_stack_smash_protection = "xyes" ; then
2007 Jul 11
1
Stepwise GLM selection by LRT?
Dear List, having searched the help and archives, I have the impression that there is no automatic model selection procedure implemented in R that includes/excludes predictors in logistic regression models based on LRT P-values. Is that true, or is someone aware of an appropriate function somewhere in a custom package? Even if automatic model selection and LRT might not be the most appropriate
2002 Jun 06
1
score in LRT testing for trend
Hi there, This is not a strictly related R question; I apologize for this. I'm interest in simulate the sampling distribution of the LRT, testing for trend among the levels of some categorical variable X in a regression model. (in practice this is achieved by assigning scores to the levels of X and fitting such numeric variable). To simulate the sampling distribution the steps are: 1.
2012 Dec 05
3
[PATCH] qemu-traditional: update configure check for -lrt changes in glibc 2.17
configure uses clock_gettime to check whether -lrt is needed - and don''t check other functions. With glibc 2.17 clock_gettime is part of libc, so use timer_gettime instead, which is in -lrt in old and new versions of glibc. Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de> --- configure | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure b/configure index
2013 May 07
3
Re: [PATCH] qemu-traditional: update configure check for -lrt changes in glibc 2.17
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 09:21:17AM -0700, Matt Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:40:13PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > Ping > > Makes sense. > > Acked-by: Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com> > > > On Wed, Jan 16, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > > > Ping > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 05, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > > > > >
2010 Nov 29
2
FW: how to use by() ?
Thank you for the suggestion, Bill. The result is not quite what I would like. Here's sample code for you or anyone else who may be interested: Al1 = c('A','C','C','C') Al2 = c('G','G','G','T') Freq1 = c(0.0078,0.0567,0.9434,0.9908) MAF = c(0.0078,0.0567,0.0566,0.0092) m1 = data.frame(Al1=Al1,
2010 Nov 29
3
how to use by() ?
Hello, All! How might one accomplish this using the by() function? m1 is a data frame. # populate column "m1$major_allele" for ( i in 1:length(m1$major_allele)) { if ( m1$Freq1[i] == m1$MAF[i]){ m1$major_allele[i] = m1$Al1[i] } else{ m1$major_allele[i] = m1$Al2[i] } } Jim [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2007 Dec 03
1
./configure -> "libgd unusable" (shall I build from source or scrape and rebuild?)
On a relatively new Nagios 2.x / CentOS 4.x server (only like a week old), I am experiencing gd(-devel/-progs) problems and am wondering if I should just scrape and rebuild. Here is my situation: I installed LAMP+Nagios+NagiosQL and was going to install PerfParse so that I could have trending info integrated with Nagios. The configure script would run ok, but would crap out on make &&
2008 May 01
1
shall i write to the list or to the person who answered?
I'm a bit confused because the fellows who answer do this straight to my personal address. I had to reply-to-all to get the mailinglist's address. Is this intentional? I don't see the point. Shouldn't all communication only go via the mailinglist? However, I'm now off the list. Dennis
2008 Aug 05
0
When shall SIP phone reply "480 Temporarily Unavailable"
Hello, When sending this AMI request ... 192.168.64.5 -> Action: Originate 192.168.64.5 -> Channel: SIP/9122 192.168.64.5 -> Async: True 192.168.64.5 -> Callerid: 9122 Guest2 <9122> 192.168.64.5 -> Exten: 9123 192.168.64.5 -> Context: local 192.168.64.5 -> Priority: 1 ... I've got this INVITE from Asterisk INVITE sip:9121 at 192.168.100.198:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0
2001 Feb 04
1
so .. patches ... shall i download all and patch wine with all of 'em ?
so since Gerhard told me where to find that patch, ohh god there are many patches, i got the idea, to download all patches and patch wine ... but would that make eny sence ? or would i destry wine with it ? thanks m.angermann
2006 Apr 05
3
Shall we release 3.0.1?
Hi everybody! At least xen 3.0 packages seem to be working, tested, and in a pretty good shape... (I haven't personally tested xen-unstable, so I cannot say) I propose releasing rev150 in unstable or at least experimental in the next few days... No, this is not a late april's fool... :D Comments? Ideas? Suggestions? Rants? Guido
2013 Aug 17
0
Which version shall i choose ?
Christoph Hanle schreef op 17-8-2013 18:08: > I think I will use gxpelinux.0 from 4.07 or 4.05 for "quick and dirty" > boot and have the 5.1x with gpxelinux.0 or lpxelinux.0 in the lab and > testing phase. Wouldn't iPXE be an option? It might have a couple of menu options nowadays, like Syslinux always has had. http://ipxe.org/wimboot Bernd
2009 Aug 14
0
[LLVMdev] How shall we modify llvm's OCaml binding to support LLVMContext?
I've partially ported the OCaml bindings to support LLVMContext, and I wanted to get people's opinion on how to implement it in the API. For the LLVM's C++ api, many key functions were modified to only take a LLVMContext, such as replacing the global variable Type::FloatTy with a function Type::getFloatTy(LLVMContext&). For llvm-c though, we need to maintain backwards compatibility
2009 Mar 16
1
T.38 - Which endpoint shall reINVITE ? caller or callee ?
Hi, I've been playing with T.38. I observed that mostly but not always, it's the "calling endpoint" that reINVITE the other party to drop current SIP/G711 session and start a new T.38. But sometimes, it's also the callee party that reINVITE the calling party. Which is the "standardized" or most common, way to start a T.38 session ? Shall it come from callee or
2019 Apr 03
1
where shall I enforce sieve and quota plugins
Hello, guys, I'm going to using sieve and quota plugins, but I'm not sure where shall I enforce against properly? I see somebody uses them against 20-imap.conf, 15-lda.conf, or 20-lmtp.conf I use LMTP as MDA, so where is the correct location to call these plugins and why? Thanks, -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2015 Mar 04
0
Domain Member Server (wheezy) - Unable to edit permissions of share without usermapping - shall I add to Wiki?
On 04/03/15 18:31, Shane Robinson wrote: > Hello again Rowland, list! > > Sorry for the delayed response, and top posting. > > To recap: > I'd like to complete the member server wiki so that ACLs can be set from > windows without taking undocumented steps. > > The three ways I've found to do this are: > > 1) map root to administrator. (LPH VanBelle's
2015 Mar 04
0
Domain Member Server (wheezy) - Unable to edit permissions of share without usermapping - shall I add to Wiki?
On 04/03/15 19:25, Davor Vusir wrote: > If I remember correctly it doesn't matter what combinations you > 'chmod' to. It changes to 755 as soon as you change ACLs from Windows. > I suggest you add uid- and gidnumber to all users and groups and chown > to a user:group (or perhaps group:group if possible). For example > chown FileShareAdmin:FileShareAdminGroup and let the
2017 Oct 29
0
Debate: Shall some of Microsoft R Open Code be ported to mainstream R?
User here: incorporating Intel's MKL, as MRO does, would be a very welcome addition. I was an MRO user before and it improved my experience with medium data immensely. They did, however, leave behind bugs here and there, especially related to development with Rcpp, so I switched back to vanilla R. On Mon, Oct 30, 2017, 9:42 AM Juan Telleria <jtelleriar at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear