similar to: Arrhenius Plot 2 with lattice

Hi, I was wondering why anova() and drop1() give different tail probabilities for F tests. I guess overdispersion is calculated differently in the following example, but why? Thanks for any advice, Tom For example: > x<-c(2,3,4,5,6) > y<-c(0,1,0,0,1) > b1<-glm(y~x,binomial) > b2<-glm(y~1,binomial) > drop1(b1,test="F") Single term deletions Model: y ~

hello there, I like to print a theoretical function into my data. It would work with "panel.curve" when it's all "normal". but unfortunately it's an arrhenius plot and I need "1000/Temperature"(70-300K) at the x-axis. With my data it wasn't a Problem but now I have to add this function to the plot and don't know how to turn around the variable in the

Hi, I'm currently doing some analyses on time of failure of a product. I found on the internet some article about the Arrhenius equation, and I can calculate the results with R. Equation: k=A*exp(-Ea/R*T) I can fit a model with lm for this purpose, so far no problem. But for the confidence interval, how can I use the Weibull distribution? Or should I use the weibull distribution at all? Or

When rsync'ing to a module with rsync -a I have a file appear with the proper owner, but not the proper group set. Below is the module, is it functionally possible to hard set the group like the user while still using the -a flag with rsync. max connections = 25 timeout = 600 secrets file = /etc/rsyncd.secrets lock file = /var/tmp/rsyncd.lock list = yes [release] comment = Release

Hi, I have a seemingly common problem but I can't find a proper way to approach it. Let's say we have 5 samples (different size) of IC circuits coming from 5 production lines (A, B, C, D, E). We apply two different non-destructive QA procedures to each sample, producing to sets of binary outcomes (passed: no/yes). So, we have two groups of proportions: QA1 QA2 no/yes no/yes A

Some users are hitting this panic in network_alloc_rx_buffers() when running a big network intensive app: /* Check return status of HYPERVISOR_dom_mem_op(). */ if ( rx_mcl[nr_pfns].args[5] != nr_pfns ) panic("Unable to reduce memory reservation\n"); I''m not clear on what is happening here. Are the domains changing size? Which memory reservation is being