similar to: Titles in plots overlap

Hi, I am new to R for solving optimization problems, I have set of communication channels with limited capacity with two types of costs, fixed and variable cost. Each channel has expected gain for a single communication. I want to determine optimal number of communications for each channel maximizing ROI)return on investment) with overall budget as constraint.60000 is the budget allocated.

Jim has been exceedingly patient (and may well continue to be so), but this smells like "failure to launch". At what point will you start showing your (failed) attempts at solving your own problems so we can help you work on your specific weaknesses and become self-sufficient? -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On February 25, 2018 7:55:55 AM PST, Val <valkremk at

HI Jim and all, I want to put one more condition. Include col2 and col3 if they are not in col1. Here is the data mydat <- read.table(textConnection("Col1 Col2 col3 K2 X1 NA Z1 K1 K2 Z2 NA NA Z3 X1 NA Z4 Y1 W1"),header = TRUE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE) The desired out put would be Col1 Col2 col3 1 X1 0 0 2 K1 0 0 3 Y1 0 0 4 W1 0 0 6 K2 X1

Hi Val, My fault - I assumed that the NA would be first in the result produced by "unique": mydat <- read.table(textConnection("Col1 Col2 col3 Z1 K1 K2 Z2 NA NA Z3 X1 NA Z4 Y1 W1"),header = TRUE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE) val23<-unique(unlist(mydat[,c("Col2","col3")])) napos<-which(is.na(val23)) preval<-data.frame(Col1=val23[-napos],

hi Val, Your problem seems to be that the data are read in as a factor. The simplest way I can think of to get around this is: mydat <- read.table(textConnection("Col1 Col2 col3 Z1 K1 K2 Z2 NA NA Z3 X1 NA Z4 Y1 W1"),header = TRUE,stringsAsFactors=FALSE) preval<-data.frame(Col1=unique(unlist(mydat[,c("Col2","col3")]))[-1], Col2=NA,col3=NA) rbind(preval,mydat)

Thank you Jim, I read the data as you suggested but I could not find K1 in col1. rbind(preval,mydat) Col1 Col2 col3 1 <NA> <NA> <NA> 2 X1 <NA> <NA> 3 Y1 <NA> <NA> 4 K2 <NA> <NA> 5 W1 <NA> <NA> 6 Z1 K1 K2 7 Z2 <NA> <NA> 8 Z3 X1 <NA> 9 Z4 Y1 W1 On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 6:18 PM, Jim

Sorry , I hit the send key accidentally here is my complete message. Thank you Jim and all, I got it. I have one more question on the original question What does this "[-1] " do? preval<-data.frame(Col1=unique(unlist(mydat[,c("Col2","col3")]))[-1], Col2=NA,col3=NA) mydat <- read.table(textConnection("Col1 Col2 col3 Z1 K1 K2 Z2

Dear list members, I am facing difficulties in making a graphics that could show visually results of a model. I have tested the effects of 4 quantitative variables (Z1, Z2, Z3, Z4) on a variable Y using a weighted mixed effects GLM with weights W (using the glmmPQL function). I applied a blocking approach using factor F2 nested in factor F1 as a grouping structure on a random intercept in

Thank you Jim and all, I got it. I have one more question on the original question What does this "[-1] " do? preval<-data.frame(Col1=unique(unlist(mydat[,c("Col2","col3")]))[-1], Col2=NA,col3=NA) mydat <- read.table(textConnection("Col1 Col2 col3 Z1 K1 K2 Z2 NA NA Z3 X1 NA Z4 Y1 W1"),header = TRUE)

Dear R users/developers I requested help to solve the problem of formulating Multivariate Sample selection model by using Full Information Maximum Likelihood (FIML)estimation method. I could not get any response. I formulated the following code of FIML to analyse univariate sample selection problem. Would you please advise me where is my problem library (sem) library(nrmlepln) Selection

I have a matrix for which each row has 12 elements that represent the xyz coordinates of 4 points. So each row of M is (x1,y1,z1,x2,y2,z2,x3,y3,z3,x4,y4,z4). Some points have NA as z values. I want another matrix to be the same as M but with the coordinates of those points with z=NA placed last. For ezample if z1=NA then the new matrix row should be (x2,y2,z2,x3,y3,z3,x4,y4,z4,x1,y1,z1)

Dear all, I have a set of data with 4 inputs (independent variables) and one output (dependent variable). I want to perform a regression analysis in order to fit these data to a regression model, however due to the non-linearity of the model I do not have a clue which equation to use. I am thinking of starting with a very general equation including ^3 terms and interactions between the variables

Hi All, I am reading a file as follow, mydat <- read.table(textConnection("Col1 Col2 col3 Z2 NA NA Z3 X1 NA Z4 Y1 W1"),header = TRUE) 1. "NA" are missing should be replace by 0 2. value that are in COl2 and Col3 should be included in col1 before they appear in col2 and col3. So the output data looks like as follow, X1 0 0 Y1 0 0 W1 0 0 Z2 0 0 Z3 X1 0 Z4 Y1

Dear guRus: I am using lmer for a mixed model that includes a random intercept for a set of effects that have the same distribution, Normal(0, sig2b). This set of effects is of variable size, so I am using an as.formula statement to create the formula for lmer. For example, if the set of random effects has dimension 8, then the lmer call is: Zs<-

Hi Val, Try this: preval<-data.frame(Col1=unique(unlist(mydat[,c("Col2","col3")]))[-1], Col2=NA,col3=NA) rbind(preval,mydat) Jim On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 3:34 PM, Val <valkremk at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am reading a file as follow, > > mydat <- read.table(textConnection("Col1 Col2 col3 > Z2 NA NA > Z3 X1 NA > Z4 Y1

Thank you Jim I wanted a final data frame after replacing the NA's to "0" x1 = rbind(unique(preval),mydat) x2 <- x1[is.na(x1)] <- 0 x2 but I got this, [1] 0 why I am getting this? On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Jim Lemon <drjimlemon at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Val, > Try this: > >

> On Mar 11, 2018, at 3:32 PM, Neha Aggarwal <aggarwalneha2000 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello All, > I am facing a unique problem and am unable to find any help in R help pages > or online. I will appreciate your help for the following problem: > I have 2 data-frames, samples below and there is an expected output > > R Dataframe1: > C1 C2

On 24/02/2018 1:53 PM, William Dunlap via R-help wrote: > x1 = rbind(unique(preval),mydat) > x2 <- x1[is.na(x1)] <- 0 > x2 # gives 0 > > Why introduce the 'x2'? x1[...] <- 0 alters x1 in place and I think that > altered x1 is what you want. > > You asked why x2 was zero. The value of the expression > f(a) <- b > and assignments

Hi all, I have a data frame with "clustered" rows as follows: Cu1 x1 y1 z1 ... Cu1 x2 y2 z2 ... Cu1 x3 y3 z3 ... # end of first cluster Cu1 Cu2 x4 y4 z4 ... Cu2 x5 y5 z5 Cu2 ... # end of second cluster Cu2 Cu3 ... ... "cluster"-size is 3 in the example above (rows making up a cluster are always consecutive). Is there any faster way to sample n clusters (with

x1 = rbind(unique(preval),mydat) x2 <- x1[is.na(x1)] <- 0 x2 # gives 0 Why introduce the 'x2'? x1[...] <- 0 alters x1 in place and I think that altered x1 is what you want. You asked why x2 was zero. The value of the expression f(a) <- b and assignments are processed right to left so x2 <- x[!is.na(x1)] <- 0 is equivalent to x[!is.na(x1)] <- 0 x2