similar to: How to make a cartesian pairlist?

Hi, I'm looking for a function that will take a list of columns or data.frame and corvert it to cartesian pairlist. For example for this data.frame (see below), I'd like to get a list of all possible pairs: > sound cs rs ns 7 5 2 4 5 4 6 3 1 8 4 1 6 4 2 6 7 1 2 2 5 9 2 5 how can I get this? > mylist ((cs,rs), (cs,ns), (rs,ns))

Hi all, I'm trying to plot this two curves in a single cartesian plane, but when I plot the first one, the plot appears with no negative "y" value. When I plot the second curve, it almost does not apear in the graph. I was trying the plot.window but with no success. Can someone help me with this? If possible, I'd like to plot this curves in a perfect cartesian plane. f =

My routine (below) works OK but misbehaves if the on-screen plot is made wider using the mouse. The problem is caused by using par("usr")[1] - 0.07 * (par("usr")[2] - par("usr")[1]) to locate two items on the y-axis. The rest of the labeling is controlled by the "line=0" parameter setting. Of course resizing changes the absolute plot width, and

Michael, thanks for this info. I've stumbled upon this in a case where I walk an R expression (the AST) and (optionally) modifies it (part of the globals package). In R expressions, a function definition uses a pairlist to represent the arguments. For example, > expr <- quote(function(x = 1) x) > str(as.list(expr)) List of 4 $ : symbol function $ :Dotted pair list of 1 ..$ x:

>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>> on Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:21:13 -0700 writes: > Thanks, this was what I expected. There is a desire to > eliminate the usage of pairlist from user code, which > suggests the alternative of allowing for function > arguments to be stored in lists. That's a much deeper

The coercion is probably the most viable workaround for now, as it's consistent with what happens internally for calls. All pairlists/calls are converted to list for subassignment, but only calls are converted back. My guess is that the intent was for users to move from using a pairlist to the "new" (almost 20 years ago) list. In my opinion, consistency trumps "convenience"

On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Martin Maechler > <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>>>> on Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:21:13 -0700 writes: >> >> > Thanks, this was what I expected. There is a desire to >>

Hi, I seem to not be able to assign NULL to an element of a pairlist without causing it to be coerced to a plain list. For example: > x <- pairlist(1, 2) > class(x) [1] "pairlist" > x[1] <- list(NULL) > class(x) [1] "list" This actually true for all [()<- assignments regardless of list value, e.g. > x <- pairlist(1, 2) > x[1] <- list(0) [1]

Is there packaged code to convert geographical coordinates (e.g., longitude, latitude, elevation) to Cartesian coordinates in 3-space? I can see how to do this using 1. a spherical-to-Cartesian conversion like pracma::sph2cart(tpr) http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pracma/ 2. a geographical-to-spherical conversion. This seems to involve (in roughly increasing order of difficulty or

Hi Henrik, It would help to understand your use case for pairlists. Thanks, Michael On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Michael Lawrence <michafla at gene.com> wrote: > The coercion is probably the most viable workaround for now, as it's > consistent with what happens internally for calls. All pairlists/calls > are converted to list for subassignment, but only calls are

Thanks, this was what I expected. There is a desire to eliminate the usage of pairlist from user code, which suggests the alternative of allowing for function arguments to be stored in lists. That's a much deeper change though. On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson at gmail.com> wrote: > Michael, thanks for this info. > > I've stumbled upon

Hi, ?pairlist gives no explanation about what exactly is the difference between a pairlist and a list (except that a pairlist of length 0 is 'NULL'). So, what's a pairlist? class(.Options) [1] "pairlist" Some strange things about the "pairlist" type: > showClass("pairlist") Error in getClass(Class) : "pairlist" is not a defined class

Hello List, I am looking for efficient code to produce the Cartesian product of two or more data.frames. I'd like to be able to do this without resorting to looping. I have searched the FAQ, web, etc without luck. That being said, the help page for merge says that the function can produce what I'm looking for if the by vectors are of zero length. Would someone be so kind as to

Hi all (I'm sure this question has been asked before, but I cant find it). If I have two character vectors: > x <- c("aaa","bbb","ccc") > y <- c("1","2","3") How can I get the cartesian product of the string values? > expand.grid(x,y) Gives me a data frame with separate columns...however, I cant seem to get *apply

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>>>>> Michael Lawrence <lawrence.michael at gene.com> >>>>>> on Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:21:13 -0700 writes: > > > Thanks, this was what I expected. There is a desire to > > eliminate the usage of pairlist from user code, which > >

Full_Name: Glen Herrmannsfeldt Version: 2.2.1 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (128.95.113.77) Following the discussion in "Writing R Extensions" in section 5.8.2, there is no indication that showArgs expects a pairlist() instead of a list(). I was trying .Call("showArgs",list(one=1,two=2,three=3)) for example, and getting many core dumps. It wasn't until reading

Dear all, It seems that as.pairlist does not convert call objects, producing results like the following: > is.pairlist(as.pairlist(quote(x + y))) [1] FALSE Should this behavior be expected? Thanks, Jialin > sessionInfo() R version 3.4.1 (2017-06-30) Platform: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu (64-bit) Running under: openSUSE Tumbleweed Matrix products: default BLAS: /usr/lib64/R/lib/libRblas.so

I have the following data from an image analysis program, in which the x and y co-ordinates are locations of the centroids of shapes on a 2 dimensional plot. The Y co-ordinates were positive, but I changed them to negative as the resulting scatterplot was upside down (the image analysis program reads from the top of the image to the bottom, so it seems) I now need these as point pattern data, as I

Dear R developers Using the 'foreach' package I encounter warnings like Warning message: In identical(.combine, cbind) : ignoring non-pairlist attributes Warnings appear once in a new R-session when I run a particular piece of code - and not again. I understand from the source code of 'identical' that the function checks and believes that .combine and cbind have non-pairlist

Hi, In line 5, you are allocating a vector of length nc. Then, in line 12, you are using nr as a limit, so if nr goes beyond nc, which is happening in line 39, you are in trouble. I?aki On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 at 03:30, Rory Nolan <rorynoolan at gmail.com> wrote: > I want to write an R function using R's C interface that takes a 2-column > matrix of increasing, non-overlapping