similar to: Proper syntax for using varConstPower in nlme

Hello, I'm having problems creating and using a selfStart model with nlme. Briefly, I've defined the model, a selfStart object, and then combined them to make a selfStart.default model. If I apply getInitial to the selfStart model, I get results. However, if I try usint it with nls or nlsList, these routines complain about a lack of initial conditions. If someone could point out

Hello, I will start out with the caveat that I'm not a statistician by training, but have a fairly decent understanding of probability and likelihood. Nevertheless, I'm trying to fit a nonlinear model to a dataset which has two main factors using nlme. Within the dataset there are two Type categories and four Tissue categories, thus giving me 8 datasets in total. The dataset is in

Hello, I am trying to design new variance structures by using fixed effects variables in combination with the VarPower function. That is, I would like to create and evaluate my own variance function in the data frame and then incorporate it into the model using varPower, with value=.5. As a start, I am trying to recreate the function of VarConstPower by introducing two new variables in the

I have been using gnls with the weights argument (and varConstPower) to specify a variance structure for curve fits. In attempting to extract the parameters for the variance model I am seeing results I don't understand. When I simply display the model (or use "summary" on the model), I get what seem like reasonable values for both "power" and "const". When I

Hello, I'm trying to do some non-linear regression with 2 cell types and 4 tissue type treatments using selfStart models Following Ritz and Streibig (2009), I wrote the following routines: ##Selfstart expDecayAndConstantInflowModel <- function(Tb0, time, aL, aN, T0){ exp(-time*aL)*(T0*aL+(-1+exp(time * aL))*Tb0 * aN)/aL } expDecayAndConstantInflowModelInit <- function(mCall, LHS,

I'm getting an error from nlme that has me stymied. I have a data set ,'mydata', with variables: AChE, Dose, sex, set, and mrid; 'set' and 'mrid' indicate two levels of nesting, with 'set' nested within 'mrid'. I want to fit the model: mod <- nlme(AChE ~ Cexp(Dose, A, B, m), data=mydata, fixed = A+B+M~sex, random=A+B+m~sex | mrid/set,

Dear Thomas Lumley, and R-help list members, I have read your article "Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons" (Statist Med, 2002) with great interest. I found it very helpful that you included the R code to replicate your analysis; however, I have had a problem replicating your example and wondered if you are able to give me a hint. When I use the code from the

  Hola,   Por favor, ¿podríais indicarme qué recursos (librerías o ideas) pueden resultar de utilidad para crear un gráfico del estilo del de la figura 3.8 del siguiente link?   http://www.tsc.uvigo.es/BIO/Bioing/ChrLDoc3.html#3.5   Actualmente estoy utilizando funciones muy básicas y la verdad es que no me encuentro muy satisfecha con el resultado.   Muchas gracias.   Eva [[alternative HTML

Works perfectly. Thank you. -Hugh Rand -----Original Message----- From: Spencer Graves [mailto:spencer.graves at pdf.com] Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 6:41 PM To: Rand, Hugh Cc: 'r-help at lists.R-project.org' Subject: Re: [R] trouble with extraction/interpretation of variance structure para meters from a model built using gnls and varConstPower How about this: >

Dear All, I'm trying to model heteroscedasticity using a multilevel model. To do so, I make use of the nlme package and the weigths-parameter. Let's say that I hypothesize that the exam score of students (normexam) is influenced by their score on a standardized LR test (standLRT). Students are of course nested in "schools". These variables are contained in the

Hi everybody, I'm interested in evaluating the effect of a continuous variable on the mean and/or the variance of my response variable. I have built functions expliciting these and used the 'mle2' function to estimate the coefficients, as follows: func.1 <- function(m=62.9, c0=8.84, c1=-1.6) { s <- c0+c1*(x) -sum(dnorm(y, mean=m, sd=s,log=T)) } m1 <- mle2(func.1,

Dear R-list members, Some months ago I wrote a message on the usage of gnls (nlme library) and here I come again. Let me give an example: I have a 10 year length-at-age data set of 10 fishes (see growth.dat at the end of this message) and I want to fit a von Bertalanffy growth model, Li= Linf*(1-exp(-k*(ti-t0))) where Li = length at age i, Linf= asymptotic length, k= curvature parameter, ti=

Hi everyone. I'm working with nlme and I have a question regarding nlme fits that fail because of singularity issues. Specifically, there a way to return an nlme object when the estimation process runs into a singular matrix? For example, can the results up to the point of an error such as "Error in solve.default(pdMatrix(a, fact = TRUE)) : system is computationally singular" or

Dear R-Users, I have a question concerning extraction of parameter estimates of variance function from lme fit. To fit my simulated data, we use varConstPower ( constant plus power variance function). fm<-lme(UPDRS~time,data=data.simula,random=~time,method="ML",weights=varConstPower(fixed=list(power=1))) I extract the results of this function by using the following codes:

Hi, I would like to use a weighted lm model to reduce heteroscendasticity. I am wondering if the only way to generate the weights in R is through the laborious process of trial and error by hand. Does anyone know if R has a function that would automatically generate the weights need for lm? Thanks, -- Tom [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I am having trouble fitting correlation structures within nlme. I would like to fit corCAR1, corGaus and corExp correlation structures to my data. I either get the error "step halving reduced below minimum in pnls step" or alternatively R crashes. My dataset is similar to the CO2 example in the nlme package. The one major difference is that in my case the 'conc' steps are

Dear R users, I am currently analyzing a dataset using lme(). The model I use has the following structure: model<-lme(response~Covariate+TreatmentA+TreatmentB,random=~1|Block/Plot,method="ML") When I plot the residuals against the fitted values, I see a clear positive trend (meaning that the variance increases with the mean). I tried to solve this issue using weights=varPower(),

Hi, I need to correct for ar(1) behavior of my residuals of my model. I noticed that there are multiple gls models in R. I am wondering if anyone has experience in choosing between gls models. For example, how should one decide whether to use lm.gls in MASS, or gls in nlme for correcting ar(1)? Does anyone have a preference? Any advice is appreciated! Thanks, -- Tom [[alternative HTML

R 1.6.2 for Windows, Win2k: I have fitted a weighted least squares model using the code "wls.out <- gls(y ~ x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 - 1, data = foo.frame, weights = varConstPower(form = ~ fitted(.), fixed = list(power = 0.5), const = 1))" The data has 62 rows and the response is zero when the covariates are zero. The purpose of the model was to account for the the fact that

Hi, I guess this is a final plea, and maybe this should go to R-help but here goes. I am writing a set of functions for calibration and prediction, and to calculate standard errors and intervals I need the variance function to be evaluated at new prediction points. So for instance fit<-gnls(Y~SSlogis(foo,Asym,xmid,scal),weights=varPower())