similar to: zoo: merging aggregated zoo-objects fails

I've had this a long time but haven't submitted it yet. I've tried to mirror the ia32 setup, so there should be a new subdirectory src/libFLAC/ppc . The first two attachments go there. The third is a context diff for src/libFLAC/Makefile.am . I have some more modified files, which I figured I'd submit after the above are checked in and working for somebody other than me. If you

I have a model, Vendor, which belongs_to :account, :visiting_address. (1..1 for both) Now, to ''prevent redundancy''/inconsistencies, the Vendor model doesn''t have a name attribute, but instead stores it''s name in account.name. (Should probably be the other way around, but that''s messier) My controller goes something like this: @vendor =

Author: bw Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 8256e1e381a84873d93d900e1d0735c57208e91b Log message: 6331032 in.routed deletes aggregated passive routes through remote gateways Files: update: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.sbin/in.routed/table.c

On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > Hey all, I've been using ->add_database for a few years > to tie sharded DBs together and it works great. > > Now, I want to be able to search across several DBs > which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB. > > I want to search for something across all of them, but > prioritize results

On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 06:04:42PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > > Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term > > > calls on a per-DB basis? > > > > That would probably work if you don't want to be able to vary the

On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:23:09AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > Btw, is there a way to quickly figure out which sub-DB a retrieved > document or mset item belongs to? Yes: https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/FAQ/MultiDatabaseDocumentID 1.4.12 added a Database::size() method which reports the number of shards - for older versions you have to keep track of that yourself (which needs a little care as

Good afternoon, On Mon, 2020-01-13 at 13:30 +0000, Chip wrote: > Hi > > I have a potential project for which my client requests that we load > balance the streaming service. > > Of course, the Icecast server scales very well. > > - http://icecast.org/loadtest/ > > However, the client requests high-availability and, due to the scale of the > potential

You could use AWS Route 53 to do the load balancing or a server side script to do it. Route 53 could be done in no time and works well for us. On Tue, Jan 14, 2020, 11:36 Chip <chiapas at aktivix.org> wrote: > Many thanks for this Philipp. > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 14:01, Philipp Schafft < > phschafft at de.loewenfelsen.net> wrote: > >> I would recommend against

On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 18:38, Alex Hackney <me at alexhackney.com> wrote: > You could use AWS Route 53 to do the load balancing or a server side > script to do it. Route 53 could be done in no time and works well for us. > Sounds very interesting, Alex. AWS Route 53 is new to mw. And how do you you aggregate listener stats from your server cluster? Cheers Chip Scooter

On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 13:16, Alex Hackney <me at alexhackney.com> wrote: > I built a system for handling all the data, songs, listeners, royalties, > etc. It's all in the docs. > Thanks. Which docs? Icecast docs or Route 53 docs? Chip On Tue, Jan 14, 2020, 17:57 Chip <chiapas at aktivix.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 19:32, Michel van Dop

Hi, I am trying to fit a non-linear model for a parasite dataset. Initially, I tried log-transforming the data and conducting a 2-way ANCOVA, and found that the equal variance of populations and normality assumptions were violated. Gaba et al. (2005) suggests that the Weibull Distribution is best for highly aggregated parasite distributions, and performs better (lower type 1 and 2 error rates)

Hi, I have aggregated data in 5 categories and want to fit a gamma distribution to it (works fine). My question is that on theoretical grounds I could claim that the observation in the first category (the zero count) are certain, i.e. I know for sure the number. This would then mean in fitting a gamma distribution to the remaining 4 categories. My question is now how can I compare the fit

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 06:04:42PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > > > Or would I fiddle with wdf_inc for all ->index_text and ->add_term > > > > calls on a per-DB basis? > > > >

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 10:23:09AM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Btw, is there a way to quickly figure out which sub-DB a retrieved > > document or mset item belongs to? > > Yes: https://trac.xapian.org/wiki/FAQ/MultiDatabaseDocumentID > > 1.4.12 added a Database::size() method which reports the number of > shards - for

Hi list, I have data in a dataframe t1, with a column for different amounts spent, a column what it was spent on, and a column with dates, from which I create a new column with months. Example: amount <- rep(c(10,20,30),3) what <- rep(c("food","books","cycling"),3) when <- c(rep("2008-09-05",5),rep("2008-10-07",4)) t1 <-

R-sig-debian help, I'm working on Ubuntu 9.10 and have installed emacs (GNU Emacs 22.2.1) I wish to embed R into emacs. I have looked at some websites on how to integrate both but it doesn't seem to work. Can I get some starting point/procedure to achieve it? Thanks in advance ---------------------------------------------------------------- Luis Ridao Cruz Faroe Marine Research

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Hey all, I've been using ->add_database for a few years > > to tie sharded DBs together and it works great. > > > > Now, I want to be able to search across several DBs > > which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB. > >

Hey all, I've been using ->add_database for a few years to tie sharded DBs together and it works great. Now, I want to be able to search across several DBs which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB. I want to search for something across all of them, but prioritize results to favor one or some of those DBs over others. Is there a way to do that without reindexing? Or

Good afternoon, On Mon, 2020-01-13 at 13:41 +0000, Chip wrote: > Good afternoon Philipp > > Many thanks for your reply. > Sorry for not being clear. > > I think the problem I have would be in the implementation. Ok. > How do I run two versions of Icecast on two servers, with load balancing > between the two (perhaps using RR-DNS), Generally I recommend RR-DNS as it

I built a system for handling all the data, songs, listeners, royalties, etc. It's all in the docs. On Tue, Jan 14, 2020, 17:57 Chip <chiapas at aktivix.org> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 19:32, Michel van Dop <mvandop at xs4all.nl> wrote: > >> We use a dns failover solution include roundrobin. Its not super fast but >> in 120 seconds the solution work. So