similar to: Very inaccurate circles

I have a matrix that looks like this: structure(c("0.0376673981759913", "0.111066500741386", "1", "1103", "18", "OPEN", "DEPR", "0.0404073656092023", "0.115186044704599", "1", "719", "18", "OPEN", "DEPR", "0.0665342096693433",

Dear List, This is just a programming problem which i cannot seem to figure out. I am trying to get a set of power from a test (say, kolmogorov smirnov) out of a distribution (say, G-K distribution) as follows. I am trying to reduce to pain of writing the whole set of data points (p# below) using "for" loop. However, I seem to have some problem in it as the output "M" does not

I am a new user of the R spatstat package and am having problems creating a polygonal observation window with owin(). Code follows: library("maps") library ("sp")` library("spatstat") mass.map <- map("state", "massachusetts:main", fill=T) # This returns a data frame includding x and y components that form a polygon of massachusetts mainland`

Hi, We are try new Asterisk13 and was noted it don't execute h exten priorities inside macros. We have a macro where we make all our call processing, and we use h exten inside it for billing (updating CDR(vars)). If context where that macro is called have some h extens, asterisk execute them. So, I wonder, h exten inside macros was deprecated? Thanks in advance. Atenciosamente,

Dear all, I am interested in solving a MIP problem with binary outcomes and continuous variables, which ARE NOT RESTRICTED TO BE NEGATIVE. In particular, Max {z1,z2,z3,b1} z1 + z2 + z3 (s.t.) # 7 z1 + 0 z2 + 0 z3 + b1 <= 5 # 0 z1 + 8 z2 + 0 z3 - b1 <= 5 # 0 z1 + 0 z2 + 6 z3 + b1 <= 7 # z1, z2, z3 BINARY {0,1} # -5<= b1 <=5 (i.e. b1 <= 5; -b1 <= 5 ) Using

The following comment: 00881 // As a hack, we allow "align 2" on functions as a synonym for "alignstack 00882 // 2". in "lib/AsmParser/LLParser.cpp" appears inaccurate, the "alignment" is later parsed as the alignment of the function itself, both when directly placed on the function: 02975 // If the alignment was parsed as an attribute, move

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682 djm at mindrot.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Additional Comments From djm at mindrot.org 2004-03-30 16:15

My CDR is displaying wildly inaccurate results. When I make a call the CDR records the time between connecting into the server and hanging up, instead of recording the time between dialling from the server to the PSTN destination via VOIP termination. It is alright to log the duration of the connection to the server, but why it does not log calls for termination via voip provider is the main

Can anyone help make sense of this? This is an ext3 partition. It's only showing 403GB out of 426GB used, but then it says only 632MB available? Where'd the extra ~25GB go? [scarolan at server]$ df -H /disks/vrac5 Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb2 426GB 403GB 632MB 100% /disks/vrac5

If I run this: find /path/to/files/ -type f -mtime -2 -name *.xml.gz I get the expected results, files with modify time less than two days old. But, if I run it like this, with the print0 flag: find /path/to/files/ -print0 -type f -mtime -2 -name *.xml.gz I get older files included as well. Anyone know why?

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2390 ------- Additional Comments From woodd@deshaw.com 2005-02-24 17:21 ------- Created an attachment (id=980) --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=980&action=view) Proposed sender.c / receiver.c patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2390 Summary: some dry run stats inaccurate Product: rsync Version: 2.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: woodd@deshaw.com QAContact:

Brian Ripley writes today: >> There is already a usable log1p implementation in src/nmath/log1p, for >> platforms without it. All we need to do is to arrange to use it on those >> systems with broken versions. That's not easy without access to such a >> platform to test it, though. I need the same kind of test in my own software, so I made some experiments and

Ray Brownrigg <ray@mcs.vuw.ac.nz> writes today about the log1p() problems on NetBSD 1.6 and OpenBSD 3.2: >> Indeed, but since I have acess to a NetBSD developer, this is an >> opportunity to get it fixed for everyone. That's a start, but the reality is that it isn't enough. There will be many sites that don't upgrade O/S versions except at possibly very long

Full_Name: Jim Breaux Version: 1.9.0 OS: WinXP Submission from: (NULL) (209.78.110.135) According to the help for 'round' it is supposed to round to the even digit. However, see the following examples: In the following, R is rounding down: > round(0.3645, 3) [1] 0.364 > round(0.3655, 3) [1] 0.365 > round(0.3665, 3) [1] 0.366 > round(0.3675, 3) [1] 0.367 > round(0.3685,

I haven't looked inside to see what is causing this, but there's a big discontinuity in qgamma: curve(qgamma(x, shape=19), from=1e-10, to=2e-10) This appears in both R-patched and R-devel. Duncan Murdoch

Full_Name: Attila Lengyel Version: 2.8.0 OS: WinXP Submission from: (NULL) (81.182.224.160) > -0.3+0.1+0.1+0.1 [1] 2.775558e-17

Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez wrote: > Patch against current trunk attached. It is a one-liner, so I do not > believe anyone can claim copyright over it. Fixed for r-devel (r51115). > Cheers, >=20 > Manuel. >=20 > BTW, bugs.r-project.org is painfully slow. I cannot login, I cannot pos= t > messages, I cannot attach files. And it doesn't handle accents in my

Hi, `stats::chisq.test` checks that x and y each have at least 2 levels AFTER filtering on complete cases. It makes sense but the error message is misleading : ?'x' and 'y' must have at least 2 levels? Here?s how to reproduce the issue : x <- structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 2L), .Label = c("0001", "0003"), class = "factor") y <-

If you multiply a matrix by its inverse you should get an identity matrix. In R, you get an answer that is accurate up to about 16 decimal points? Why can't one get a perfect answer? See for example: c(5,3)->x1 c(3,2)->x2 cbind(x1,x2)->x solve(x)->y x%*%y Vikas Rawal ============================================== This Mail was Scanned for Virus and found Virus free