similar to: R CMD BATCH question under Ubuntu 9.04

Hi list, How to save a list content into a text file? Please consider example below, I have two numeric matrices that I bundle into a list & give each list element a name Example: > matrixA <- matrix(0,5,4) > matrixB <- matrix(1,7,13) > matrixList <- list(matrixA,matrixB) > names <- c("Matrix A","Matrix B") > names <-

Hi List, My apologies in advance if question is simplistic, I am quite new to R graphics capabilities and I could not find anything in past threads... I use R 2.8.1 under Mac OS X, but I would preferrably have a cross platform answer as I use also R under Windows I produce plots using R & save them in a file e.g. below: y <- rnorm(1000) x <- rnorm(1000) plot(x,y)

Hi I'm having an issue with doveadm batch - the following command always crashes: doveadm batch : mailbox status all inbox Whereas the following work as expected: doveadm mailbox status all inbox doveadm batch : mailbox list Any assistance gratefully received. Debug output from the crash: Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib64/dovecot Debug: Module loaded:

Dear list, I use the R CMD BATCH to run a file of R commands (from php for info) This file of R commands contains a line to source a configuration file "source('path/conf.R')" In this configuration file I define some variables, e.g. the path of some file (uploaded before this R CMD using php) "PathUpload <- 'path/uploads'" What I would like to

Hi List, Is there any way to pass on directly VBA variable content into a R variable? on windows XP & using R 2.12.0 I have installed RExcel addin (with associated D(COM)) >> It function fine when trying to pass Excel Range to R but I failed (sorry if it is only my own limitation, search till now unsuccessful) to find out how to pass directly VBA array into R Below an example -

Hi, Being relatively new to OO programming and not so old on R, I noticed the possibility to do OO programming in R. But it seems there is two "paradigms" S3 that seems the old one but is the one used in the R.oo package and S4 which seems more recent As a starting point, which one is best to use? Is R.oo useful? what are the main difference between the two? Any feedback

Dear all, I know this topic has already been covered in other posts (at least the for loop Vs apply family of function), but I am looking for fresh / up-to-date opinion and feedback on those 3 methods to run unavoidable loops in R. I realise that it may be too general question for many, so any feedback appreciated. 1. apply Vs for loop >> Seems apply is (was?) supposed to be faster than

Hi everyone, I have this problem and need your help. I have some files locate on windows pc that I need to upload to centos server everyday automatically and without provide password. Is there an easy way for this? I would like to use some kind of batch file because I can use schedule in WinXP to performance this job everyday. Thanks in advance, JC

hello, I'd like know if it's possible to run R with the options BATCH it means not interactively thanks. ___________________________________________________________________________ Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions ! Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses

Hello, I supose that a new version of pigeonhole is on the way because version 0.4.13 does not compile against dovecot 2.2.23 This is the error that I get gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. -I../../../src/lib-sieve -I../../../src/lib-sieve/util -I../../../src/lib-sieve/plugins/environment -I/home/jc/rpmbuild/BUILD/dovecot-2.2.23/src/imap

On 08/12/2018 19:53, Jonathan Casiot via dovecot wrote: > > Hi > > I'm having an issue with doveadm batch - the following command always > crashes: > > doveadm batch : mailbox status all inbox > > Whereas the following work as expected: > > doveadm mailbox status all inbox > doveadm batch : mailbox list > > > Any assistance gratefully

On 31/03/2016 02:06, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Hi, > > Op 3/30/2016 om 5:34 PM schreef Juan C. Blanco: >> Hello, I supose that a new version of pigeonhole is on the way because >> version 0.4.13 does not compile against dovecot 2.2.23 >> >> This is the error that I get >> >> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../.. -I../../.. >>

I would like to randomly shuffle a distance object, such as the one created by ade4{dist.binary} below. My first attempt, using sample(jc.dist) creates a shuffled vector, losing the lower triangular structure of the distance object. How can I Ishuffle the lower triangular part of a distance matrix without losing the structure? Thanks. --Dale x1 <- c(rep(0,4),1) x2 <- c(rep(0,2),rep(1,3))

bash: vmwarews+ssh://jc@127.0.0.1/session: No such file or directory [jc@te ~]$ virsh -c vmwarews+ssh://jc@127.0.0.1/session 错误：连接到管理程序失败 错误：不支持的操作：ssh 连接驱动程序不支持在没有套接字路径的情况下连接到会话实例 [jc@te ~]$ virsh -c vmwarews+ssh://root@127.0.0.1/session 错误：连接到管理程序失败 错误：不支持的操作：ssh 连接驱动程序不支持在没有套接字路径的情况下连接到会话实例 [jc@te ~]$ virsh -c vmwarews:///session Segmentation fault (核心已转储)

>>>>> "JC" == Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> writes: JC> This stems from PJSIP not being dynamic with transports (it JC> doesn't like its environment changed to that degree while JC> in use). I'm afraid if your IP changes you'd have to restart JC> Asterisk when you are using PJSIP. Wow. I say this having voted for pjsip over the listed

Hi, Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One consequence is (at least on Mac OS X 10.11 but probably in more generality) that R_BATCH_OPTIONS are ignored, which was kind of fatal in my case... I am thus wondering whether it makes sense to either a) have R_BATCH_OPTIONS also

Hi, this is not strictly puppet related but I am hoping someone here who uses puppet-lint can tell me what is going on here......... $ puppet-lint init.pp /Users/jc/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.3-p125/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.9.1/ rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require'': iconv will be deprecated in the future, use String#encode instead.

>>>> Maybe it could be a temporary solution. I think that if the checks are >>>> successfully passed and the basic block of the statement has exactly >>>> 14 instructions, the statement contains matrix multiplication and can >>>> be safely optimized with a generation of specific code, which takes >>>> into account information about usage

Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> writes: > On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote: > | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I > | didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One > | consequence is (at least on Mac OS X 10.11 but probably in more > | generality) that R_BATCH_OPTIONS are

Hello, Jeff. You wrote Saturday, January 22, 2005, 3:57:28 AM: JC> Reid, the binary/text mode is a valid issue. This set of flags worked for me: std::ios_base::out | std::ios_base::trunc | std::ios_base::binary Yes, there are open issues with std::ios_base::binary, but llvm are not affected with them now. JC> I have successfully used a bytecode file on Windows that was created JC> on