similar to: swifty fly?

Hello, I''m running a Rails application which must sort and manipulate a lot of data which are loaded in memory. The Rails app runs on 2 mongrel processes. When I first load the app, both are 32Mb in memory. After some days, both are between 200Mb and 300Mb. My question is : is there some kind of garbage collector in Mongrel? I never see the two Mongrel processes memory footprint

So here''s a random question: if a (Ruby) multi-threaded rails server could exist (bug free), would it be faster than using a mongrel cluster? (I.e. 10 mongrel processes versus 10 Ruby threads). I''m not sure if it would. RAM it might save, though. Any thoughts? -Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello. I have discovered that mongrel does not correctly take on all the groups of the requested user/group combination. It seems that while the specified user and group is correctly activated, all the other groups that are associated with this user are not enabled and the group permissions remain the same as the caller (i.e. root). This problem (and solution) is discussed in the Ruby Forum:

Has anyone had troubles from Mongrel > 1.0.1? Just curious, because the last time I tried to run Merb it gave me some Mongrel error about the wrong number of arguments, or something like that. I can post the exact message tonight when I get home. -- Cheers, Kevin Williams http://kevwil.com/ http://www.almostserio.us/ http://kevwil.jaiku.com/

Just a quick announcement that an update to swiftiplied_mongrel and evented_mongrel which fixes the incompatibility with Mongrels > 1.0.1 has been released. http://swiftiply.swiftcore.org Let me know if you have any problems. Kirk Haines

Sorry if this is the wrong place to ask, but when I run mongrel evented using swiftiply and then send it the USR2 signal to restart it, it dies. Without eventing, USR2 restarts mongrel as expected. Anyone else seen this? Here''s a dump: $ EVENT=1 mongrel_rails start -d -P /tmp/m.pid -p 4321 Using Evented Mongrel ** Ruby version is up-to-date; cgi_multipart_eof_fix was not loaded $ kill

I read this in a previous post ( http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2006-December/002354.html) .... First, Mongrel accepts remote clients and creates one Thread for each request. Mongrel also enforces a single request/response using Connect:close headers because Ruby only supports 1024 files (so far). If Mongrel doesn''t do this then people like yourself can write a simple

I have a rails application that runs on multiple mongrels and I would like to make the log files non-interlacing. Are there any logging modifications/other loggers out there that I could use to create process safe logging? Thank you, Matt Margolis

Hi, I have read many articles on the net today about configuring Ruby on Rails on a Windows server. But there doesn''t seem to a one solution for all on how to configure a new Ruby on Rails server. So I can use some advise with this. I am using a Windows 2003 server and don''t get many request a day. But most of the request are quite heavy. The main focus is on optimizing the

Hello, I''m trying to run the latest/greatest mongrel version: % sudo gem install mongrel ... Successfully installed mongrel-1.1 % gem list mongrel mongrel (1.1) % ruby -v ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-darwin7.9.0] % uname -a Darwin NewYork.local 7.9.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.9.0: Wed Mar 30 20:11:17 PST 2005; root:xnu/xnu-517.12.7.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc

* Apologies for starting a new thread; I just subscribed. Has anyone been able to make this exploit happen if requests are being proxied to Mongrel through Apache? I''ve been trying variations on the double-encoding thing and can''t trigger the exploit through Apache. Hitting Mongrel directly does expose the problem. I''ll still upgrade my servers, of course, but I

Hey Everybody! I was wondering if/how Camping can process more than one request at once (i.e. not what Rails does). I''m fairly new to threads, and I bought a book, and read some of it, and dived into the Camping source... I found some thread stuff but I''m not... entirely sure. So I thought I would ask! RYan. http://yeahnah.org/

Can rails run under apache and mod_ruby? How? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hopefully that gets everyone''s attention. Evan Weaver has whined enough to make me do a release to change the requirements on the Mongrel gem so that it doesn''t need the cgi_multipart_eof_fix anymore. *************************** THIS ALSO MEANS THAT MONGREL WILL HAVE TO REQUIRE RUBY 1.8.6 OR GREATER! NO EXCEPTIONS! *************************** I know Debian guys like to hack

I need to deal with a large file (about more than 2G [byte]) with eventmachine. I wrote a simple program with using "stream_file_data" as send a large file from client to server. But It didn''t work. Applying below a quick fix patch, I think it works well. Could you go over this patch? Regards, -- Kuroishi Mitsuo diff -rup

Rails instances themselves are almost always single-threaded, whereas Mongrel, and it''s acceptor, are multithreaded. In a situation with long-running Rails pages this presents a problem for mod_proxy_balancer. If num_processors is greater than 1 ( default: 950 ), then Mongrel will gladly accept incoming requests and queue them if its rails instance is currently busy. So even

Guys, Just for fun, I tried to see (I know, a silly way to test it) how much overhead we have calling the C functions of the extensions. the benchmark script and the results: http://pastie.caboo.se/128646 The naive C extension: http://pastie.caboo.se/128647 I compared 1.8.6 (VC6 and mingw builds) against a fresh checkout of ruby trunk. What I understand from that is 1.9 is slower than 1.8

Hi , I know it's might not the right way to asking such stupid question. But I want to take help from experts into VoIP fields so I have to decided to post here. Please help me which will be the best VoIP conferencing phone which will cover 10 Persians into conferencing with best audio support ? -- Thanks and regards Virendra Bhati +91-8885268942 Software Engineer -------------- next

Hi, I have 8 E1 PRI Lines and i have 200 phone numbers and 200 channels (25 channels per PRI). is there a utility available in Asterisk to dial out 200 numbers and run a campaign for 200 numbers concurrently and play a mp3 file ? Please suggest/guide Regards Kaushal

forgive me if this has been resolved already... I have an app that is using sendfile to return large files to customers. We can''t use regular Apache to handle this static content since the files are what the customers are paying for - so it wouldn''t be cool for anyone else to get access to them. The issue is that the mongrel mem footprint gets bloated when the files are