similar to: Behavior of seq with vector from

Hello useRs: Does anyone have thoughts on the lifecycle of older releases of R? I know that currently the 2.8.x and 2.9.x releases seem to be actively "supported" on the mailing lists, but what about older releases, say 2.4.x? Curious to hear when people think older versions of R become obsolete and unsupportable on the lists (or other venues). Regards, Brian

I have created this data frame to help illustrate my problem. id<-c(rep(1,5),rep(2,5),rep(3,5),rep(4,5),rep(5,5)) x<-rep((seq(1:5)),5) y<-c(0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.4, 0.2, 0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.4, 0.12, 0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.55, 0.2, 0, 0.1, 0.5, 0.3, 0.2, 0, 0.1, 0.6, 0.4, 0.1) d1<-cbind(id,x,y) I would like to delete all rows where id=4, however, when I tried the command  d2=d1[-c(id==4),] and looked

Sorry if I was unclear. There are currently no “known incompatibilities” that I am aware of, although I fully admit to not being an expert on the topic. The idea is that we add versioning information to the bitcode so that if an issue were discovered, it could be easily detected and dealt with. Douglas Yung From: Bob Wilson [mailto:bob.wilson at apple.com] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 16:39

Hi- I am having a weird problem with setting dom0 kernel output to the serial console with Xen 3.0.4-1, below is my grub setting. With this setting if I don''t enter the grub menu and have the default boot to the first image, everything works fine and I can get output/input to the serial console. The problem is when I enter the grub menu and select the image to boot from, if I

On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Yung, Douglas < douglas_yung at playstation.sony.com> wrote: > Hi – > > > > I realize the thread has drifted a little, but I wanted to get back to my > original proposal. I would like to make a change to the bitcode file > wrapper to include the version of llvm that produced the bitcode. I would > like to write this version into the

Hello, I'm writing a script that automates the testing of reverse dependencies of a package. I found the function testInstalledPackage in the tools package, which seems to do what I want. However, when I use it for a source package that was installed with --install-tests, I've noticed that only the actual test files (e.g. located in inst/tests) are available and run. In other words the

As I understand it, the bitcode compatibility promise doesn't extend as far as debug info metadata (happy to be wrong here!). I think we have a usecase where need to guarantee that debug information from any two arbitrary bitcode files going into an LTO link will result in the expected/correct debug information going into the resulting ELF file; unless we can be sure that this will always

On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Alex Rosenberg <alexr at leftfield.org> wrote: > How is this use case different from the LTO-supported toolchains shipped > by other vendors such as Apple? Do they have this theoretical problem too? > > If the issue is solely constrained to debug info metadata, then why not > use metadata to describe the format/version of the debug info? >

Is there any eta for when viewvc will be back? I prefer to use viewvc because all of the commit emails have the SVN commit number, but not the corresponding git hashes, so it makes it easier to look it up. Or is there some easy way to map an svn commit number to the corresponding git hash? Douglas Yung From: Johan Engelen [mailto:jbc.engelen at gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 5:03 AM

Hi, I am looking for Chinese Japanese and Korean tokenizer that could can be use to tokenize terms for CJK languages. I am not very familiar with these languages however I think that these languages contains one or more words in one symbol which it make more difficult to tokenize into searchable terms. Lucene has CJK Tokenizer ... and I am looking around if there is some open source that we

Hi, I've noticed since about Thursday that llvm.org/viewvc seems to be only returning 404 error when trying to access it. Is this service going away? Douglas Yung -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160227/7fb2d558/attachment.html>

Hi all, A few of us have been discussing whether we should have a Xapian social gathering of some kind. The current idea is meeting up in a pub in London some time in autumn for drinks and food. However all of this really depends on who might be able to come! It would be a chance to meet other Xapian enthusiasts in an informal social setting and talk about all things search-related (and

Hi, We would like to add a version number to the bitcode wrapper. This feature would allow easier identification of what compiler produced the bitcode so that known incompatibilities with LTO compilation could be detected. Roughly speaking, this version number would consist of the major, minor and optionally the patch version of the compiler used to produce the bitcode. The version information

I spent more time than I should have debugging a script because I wanted x<-seq(0,100)*0.1 but typed x<-seq(O:100)*0.1 seq(0:100) yields 1 to 101, Clearly my own brain to fingers fumble, but possibly one others may want to avoid it. JN

Dear R-helpers: I am an R newbie and have a question related to writing functions that accept unlimited number of input arguments. (I tried to peek into functions such as paste and cbind, but failed, I cannot see their codes..) Can someone kindly show me through a summation example? Say, we have input scalar, 1 2 3 4 5 then the ideal function, say sum.test, can do

Thank you. Guess it's a plausible explanation. > -----Original Message----- > From: Liaw, Andy [mailto:andy_liaw at merck.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 08:05 AM > To: 'Chunlou Yung' > Subject: RE: [R] Plotting Speed: R vs Octave > > > If I'm not mistaken, Octave does not have its own graphics system, but > rather rely on gnuplot, which is

Hi all, Doug Yung started a discussion earlier ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-September/077227.html) about using the unused "version" field in the bitcode wrapper, and I think there was some misunderstanding. I'd like to clarify the motivation. The reason we want to add the version field is to easily identify "old" bitcode. It is only LLVM version

I would like to code the following in R: a1(b1+b2+b3) + a2(b1+b3+b4) + a3(b1+b2+b4) + a4(b1+b2+b3) or in summation notation: sum_{i=1, j\neq i}^{4} a_i * b_i I realise this is the same as: sum_{i=1, j=1}^{4} a_i * b_i - sum_{i=j} a_i * b_i would appreciate some help. Thank you. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/summation-coding-tp4646678.html Sent from the R

Dear R experts I need to write a function that incorporates double summation, the problem being that the upper limit of the second summation is the index of the first summation, i.e: sum_{j=0}^{x} sum_{i=0}^{j} choose(i+j, i) where x variable or constant, doesn't matter. The following code obviously doesn't work: f=function(x) {j=0:x; i=0:j; sum( choose(i+j,i) ) } Can you help? Thanks

Hi, I want to apologise for my bad english (I'm french). So I need to Back-up a lot of datas from a place to an another by the way of rsync with ssh naturally. A good question from my boss was : What happened when the mysql database is used by a user during the Backup ? Is the system stop the Backup or is it transparency for rsync ? Sorry if my question is stupid but I haven't