similar to: Supplying NA or Zeros in dataframe for missing factor combinations

Hi, I have a dataset with x and y coordinates and in each point I have an identity of point, in some cases I can have more then one identity by point. My dataset is something like this: > x <- rep(c(1:4),4) > y <- rep(c(1:4),c(4,4,4,4)) > area1 <- sample(factor(rep(c("a","b","c","d"),4))) > area2 <-

Dear list, When I use VennDiagram package, I got a error as follow: venn.plot <- draw.pairwise.venn( area1 = 3186, area2 = 325, cross.area = 5880); Error in draw.pairwise.venn(area1 = 3186, area2 = 325, cross.area = 588) : Impossible: cross section area too large. Does anyone have suggestion? Thank you.

I'm reading Torgo (2010) *Data Mining with R*<http://www.liaad.up.pt/~ltorgo/DataMiningWithR/code.html>in preparation for a class I'll be teaching next quarter. Here's an example that is very non-functional. > pH <- c(4.5,7,7.3,8.2,6.3) > names(pH) <- c('area1','area2','mud','dam','middle') > pH area1 area2 mud dam

Hi there, Could someone help me with the following programming problem..? I have written a function that works for my intended purpose, but it is quite closely tied to a particular dataframe and the names of the variables in this dataframe. However, I'd like to use the same function for different dataframes and variables. My problem is that I'm not quite sure how to tell my function in

Hi all: Here's a question about result of loglinear analysis. There're 2 factors:area and nation.The raw data is in the attachment. I fit the saturated model of loglinear with the command: glm_sat<-glm(fre~area*nation, family=poisson, data=data_Analysis) After that,I extract the coefficients: result_sat<-summary(glm_sat) result_coe<-result_sat$coefficients I find that all the

My data frame looks like: SightingID PA1 PA2 PlotID InOverlap Area1 2001 1 -99 392 Y 0.22 2002 1 -99 388 Y 0.253 2008 1 NA 104 N 0.344 2010 1 NA 71 N 0.185 2012 1 NA 61 N 0.166 2013 1 NA 61 N 0.227 2014 1 NA 62

Dear laurent, > But there are lots of commands I found in R docs which are "not found", > such as getTable. Deprecated (I successfully used dbListTables) or do I > simply miss a package ? >From RMySQL\NEWS: * added (almost) trivial convenience RS-DBI functions getTable(), assignTable(), existsTable(), and removeTable(). They all mimic the corresponding R/S get(),

Estimad en s, quería realizar una consulta Dado un data frame llamado aves, como puedo sustiuir las variables area, dist y distm por sus logaritmos en base10 y volver a crear un data frame? Muchas gracias Saludos Susana [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Could someone explain the meaming of this error message from augPred: > augPred(area3.pen.nlme, primary=~day) Error in predict.nlme(object, value[1:(nrow(value)/nL), , drop = FALSE], : Levels 1,2,3 not allowed for block > predict.nlme(area3.pen.nlme) does not produce an error. area3.pen.nlme was created with: > area3.pen.nlme <- nlme(area ~ SSlogis(day, Asym, xmid, scal),

Dear all, I am trying to merge two data frames based on a common column but for this common column both data frame do not have the same length and associated information. I checked previous exemples in the list but was not able to apply them in my case... Is someone know how to do that? Below is my code with the expected result: # data frame 1 Id1 <- c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3) Habit1 <-

I can think of many brute-force ways to do this outside of R, but was wondering if there was a simple/elegant solution within R instead. I have a table that looks something like the following: Factor1 Factor2 Value A 11/11/2009 5 A 11/12/2009 4 B 11/11/2009 7 B 11/13/2009 8 >From that I need to generate all permutations of Factor1 and Factor2 and force a 0 for any combination that doesn?t

Is names(model1$coef) what you're looking for? -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Cabrera [mailto:krcabrer at epm.net.co] Sent: 29 November 2002 10:36 Cc: R-help at stat.math.ethz.ch Subject: [R] Obtaining the variable names of a glm object Hi, R users! Suppose I make a model like this:

Hello, as far as I see, R reports type I sums of squares. I'd like to get R to print out type III sums of squares. e.g. I have the following model: vardep~factor1*factor2 to get the type III sum of squares for factor1 I've tried anova(lm(vardep~factor2+factor1:factor2),lm(vardep~factor1*factor2)) but that didn't yield the desired result. Could anyone give me a hint how to proceed?

I'm using area() to evaluate the area under 2 functions (defined using approxfun()) and the result is in contradiction with visual inspection (please see: http://sites.google.com/site/eospansite/dummy/problem_area.jpg ) The area under the red curve should be larger than the one under the black curve, but I'm geting the opposite result using area(). This is what I'm doing:

I'd like to get a long data set of minimum values from groups in another data set. The following almost does what I want. (Note, I'm using the word factor differently from it's meaning in R; bad choice of words) myframe = data.frame(factor1 = rep(1:2,each=8), factor2 = rep(c("a","b"),each=4, times=2), factor3 = rep(c("x","y"),each=2, times=4),

Full_Name: Tanya Logvinenko Version: 1.7.0 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (132.183.156.125) For unbalanced design, I ran into problem with ANOVA (aov function). The sum of squares for only for the second factor and total are computed correctly, but sum of squares for the first factor is computed incorreclty. Changing order of factors in the formula changes the ANOVA table. For the

Full_Name: Mike Ulrich Version: 2.9 OS: Mac OSX Submission from: (NULL) (69.169.178.34) The help documentation for loadings() lists more then one parameter. The function call only expects one parameter. The digits, cutoff, and sort parameters are not used in the function. ## S3 method for class 'loadings': print(x, digits = 3, cutoff = 0.1, sort = FALSE, ...) ## S3 method for class

Hi All, I have a 4-dimensional data. I'm using barchart() function from lattice package. The R code and data are below - code includes one for stack=TRUE and other for stack=FALSE. I would like to present the data in another form which would be plotting Factor3 levels (P, Q, R, S) as two stacked bars (side by side). Like, for each level of Factor1 there should be two bars: first bar showing

I am attempting to replicate some of my experience from SAS in R and assume there are best methods for using a combination of summary(), subset, and which() to produce a subset of mean values by categorical or ordinal factors. within sas I would write proc means mean data=dataset; class factor1 factor2 var variable1 variable2; RUN; producing an output with means for each variable by factor

Hello R How do I refer to you in a publication? Many Thanks Ross Maller -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at stat.math.ethz.ch