similar to: plot(survfit(fitCox)) graph shows one line - should show two

windows xp R 2.8.1 I am trying to plot the -log(log(survival)) to visually test the proportional hazards assumption of a Cox regression. The plot, which should give two lines (one for each treatment) gives only one line and a warning message. I would appreciate help getting two lines, and an explanation of the warning message. My problem may the that I have very few events in one of my strata,

How do you get the design matrix R used when calculating ANOVA? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-get-design-matrix--tp23464638p23464638.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hello R-community, I want to generate stacked density plots in lattice. My data consist of a numeric variable ('pid') that is measured in different individuals ('id'), which can be divided in two types ('type') and the measurements were repeated a different time points ('day'). I read in the Lattice book that this can be done using the 'flowViz'

Hello All, I can't get this one figured out. The few search hits I get on it suggest it is mail-related, but I don't even know how that was determined. Apr 11 12:18:17 mxt root: Process did not exit cleanly, returned 255 with signal 0 I get one of these per minute. I can't seem to tweak for more verbosity. Could someone tell me what is going on or point me to a place to start

On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:55:19 +0100 r-help-request at r-project.org wrote: > Welcome to the R-help at r-project.org mailing list! > > To post to this list, send your email to: > > r-help at r-project.org > > General information about the mailing list is at: > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > > If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your

Dear R users: Analysis of the impact of a time-dependent covariate (GVHD or use of steroid after bone marrow transplantation) on two competing endpoints (invasive fungal infection and death) is frequently encountered in the setting of BMT data. Coxph package can be used as the following: for the analysis of GVHD: > gvhd -> coxph(Surv(start,stop,status = =1) ~ GVHD, data=bmt.data)

Dear R users: Analysis of the impact of a time-dependent covariate (GVHD or use of steroid after bone marrow transplantation) on two competing endpoints (invasive fungal infection and death) is frequently encountered in the setting of BMT data. Coxph package can be used as the following: for the analysis of GVHD: > gvhd -> coxph(Surv(start,stop,status = =1) ~ GVHD, data=bmt.data)

Hi R-Users, I posted this question a while ago on the bioconductor mailing list but got no answers. Maybe here is somebody who might know a solution: I failed at drawing multiple filters in a densityplot() using the FlowCore/FlowViz packages. I found a way to draw multiple filters in xyplot(), using the glpolygon method within the panel-function, but some similar attempts for densityplot

Hi!!! I'm trying to implement a SUS server (local windows update) I-ve already solved my problem to modify registry in order to establish windows update configuration. Now i've a quiestion all my client logon my samba PDC enusing a netconfig.pol isend all configuration everithing works ok. But i've a trouble, my users don't have privileges to install anything and i don't

Dear R Helpers, I have noticed that when I use lmer to analyse data, the summary function gives different values for the AIC, BIC and log-likelihood compared with the anova function. Here is a sample program #make some data set.seed(1); datx=data.frame(array(runif(720),c(240,3),dimnames=list(NULL,c('x1','x2','y' )))) id=rep(1:120,2); datx=cbind(id,datx) #give x1 a

Hello dear R help members. I am trying to understand the anova.rq, and I am finding something which I can not explain (is it a bug?!): The example is for when we have 3 nested models. I run the anova once on the two models, and again on the three models. I expect that the p.value for the comparison of model 1 and model 2 would remain the same, whether or not I add a third model to be compared

Dear All, I like to simulate a physiologically based pharmacokinetics model using R but am having a problem with the daspk routine. The same problem has been implemented in Berkeley madonna and Winbugs so that I know that it is working. However, with daspk it is not, and the numbers are everywhere! Please see the following and let me know if I am missing something... Thanks a lot in advance,

Dear R developers, I noticed a bug in the stats4 package, specifically in the confint method applied to ?mle? objects. In particular, when some ?fixed? parameters define the log likelihood, these parameters are stored within the mle object but they are not used by the ?confint" method, which retrieves their value from the global environment (whenever they still exist). Sample code: >

I am trying to find methods for testing and visualizing calibration to Cox models with time-depended coefficients. I have read this nice article <http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0962280213497434>. In this paper, we can fit three models: fit0 <- coxph(Surv(futime, status) ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data = data0) p <- log(predict(fit0, newdata = data1, type = "expected")) lp

Hi , I want to apply the following code fo my data with 400 predictors. I was wondering if there ia an alternative way instead of typing 400 predictors for the following code. I really appreciate your help. fit0<-lm(Y~1, data= mydata) fit.final<- lm(Y~X1+X2+X3+.....+X400, data=mydata) ??? step(fit0, scope=list(lower=fit0, upper=fit.final), data=mydata, direction="forward")

First, as others have said please obey the mailing list rules and turn of First, as others have said please obey the mailing list rules and turn off html, not everyone uses an html email client. Here is your code, formatted and with line numbers added. I also fixed one error: "y" should be "status". 1. fit0 <- coxph(Surv(futime, status) ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data = data0) 2. p

Here is an example, modified from the help page to use test="Cp": -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > fit0 <- lm(sr ~ 1, data = LifeCycleSavings) > fit1 <- update(fit0, . ~ . + pop15) > fit2 <- update(fit1, . ~ . + pop75) > anova(fit0, fit1, fit2, test="Cp") Error in `[.data.frame`(table, , "Resid.

Hello, I'm quite new to R and want to make a Weibull-regression with the survival package. I know how to build my "Surv"-object and how to make a standard-weibull regression with "survreg". However, I want to fit a translated or 3-parametric weibull dist to account for a failure-free time. I think I would need a new object in survreg.distributions, but I don't know how

Dear List, After including cluster() option the coxreg (from eha package) produces results slightly different than that of coxph (from survival) in the following time-dependent treatment effect calculation (example is used just to make the point). Will appreciate any explaination / comment. cheers, Ehsan ############################ require(survival) require(eha) data(heart) # create weights

Hello, All: ????? The default "simulate" method for lm and glm seems to ignore the sampling variance of the parameter estimates;? see the trivial lm and glm examples below.? Both these examples estimate a mean with formula = x~1.? In both cases, the variance of the estimated mean is 1. ??? ??????? * In the lm example with x0 = c(-1, 1), var(x0) = 2, and