Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "problem with ggplot2 boxplot, groups and facets"
2023 Jul 05
1
remove_me files building up
Hi Strahil,
This is the output from the commands:
root at uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01:~# du -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick
2.2G /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.glusterfs
24M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/scalelite-recordings
16K /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/mytute
18M /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brick/.shard
0
2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Thanks for the clarification.
That behaviour is quite weird as arbiter bricks should hold?only metadata.
What does the following show on host?uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01:
du -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1/brickdu -h -x -d 1?/data/glusterfs/gv1/brick3/brickdu -h -x -d 1 /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick2/brick
If indeed the shards are taking space -?that is a really strange situation.From which version
2023 Jun 30
1
remove_me files building up
Hi,
We're running a cluster with two data nodes and one arbiter, and have sharding enabled.
We had an issue a while back where one of the server's crashed, we got the server back up and running and ensured that all healing entries cleared, and also increased the server spec (CPU/Mem) as this seemed to be the potential cause.
Since then however, we've seen some strange behaviour,
2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Hi,
Thanks for your response, please find the xfs_info for each brick on the arbiter below:
root at uk3-prod-gfs-arb-01:~# xfs_info /data/glusterfs/gv1/brick1
meta-data=/dev/sdc1 isize=512 agcount=31, agsize=131007 blks
= sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=1
= crc=1 finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=0
=
2023 Jul 03
1
remove_me files building up
Hi,
you mentioned that the arbiter bricks run out of inodes.Are you using XFS ?Can you provide the xfs_info of each brick ?
Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov?
On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 19:41, Liam Smith<liam.smith at ek.co> wrote: Hi,
We're running a cluster with two data nodes and one arbiter, and have sharding enabled.
We had an issue a while back where one of the server's
2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Hi Strahil,
We're using gluster to act as a share for an application to temporarily process and store files, before they're then archived off over night.
The issue we're seeing isn't with the inodes running out of space, but the actual disk space on the arb server running low.
This is the df -h? output for the bricks on the arb server:
/dev/sdd1 15G 12G 3.3G 79%
2023 Jul 04
1
remove_me files building up
Hi Liam,
I saw that your XFS uses ?imaxpct=25? which for an arbiter brick is a little bit low.
If you have free space on the bricks, increase the maxpct to a bigger value, like:xfs_growfs -m 80 /path/to/brickThat will set 80% of the Filesystem for inodes, which you can verify with df -i /brick/path (compare before and after).?This way?you won?t run out of inodes in the future.
Of course, always
2017 Jan 03
2
shadow_copy and glusterfs not working
Hello,
we are trying to configure a CTDB-Cluster with Glusterfs. We are using
Samba 4.5 together with gluster 3.9. We set up a lvm2 thin-provisioned
volume to use gluster-snapshots.
Then we configured the first share without using shadow_copy2 and
everything was working fine.
Then we added the shadow_copy2 parameters, when we did a "smbclient" we
got the following message:
root at
2018 Feb 07
0
Fwd: Troubleshooting glusterfs
Hello Nithya! Thank you for your help on figuring this out!
We changed our configuration and after having a successful test yesterday
we have run into new issue today.
The test including moderate read/write (~20-30 Mb/s) and scaling the
storage was running about 3 hours and at some moment system got stuck:
On the user level there are such errors when trying to work with filesystem:
OSError:
2009 May 04
2
Calculating relative ratios in a data frame..
I have a data-set that is structured as follows:
sp wg n v.realtime v.cputime v.tcputime v.idletime v.nswtch
9 0 1 1 28.61300 28.61 28.6039 0.00000e+00 407
1563 0 1 2 15.20270 30.38 28.5981 9.80523e-01 483
3128 0 1 4 12.50930 50.00 28.6053 1.07877e+01 489
4682 0 1 6 12.10260 72.55
2009 Sep 19
1
matrix operations on grobs and grid units
Dear list,
As a minimal test of a more complex grid layout, I'm trying to find a
clean and efficient way to arrange text grobs in a rectangular layout.
The labels may be expressions, or text with a fontsize different of
the default, which means that the cell sizes should probably be
calculated using grobWidth() and grobHeight() as opposed to simpler
stringWidth() and stringHeight().
2018 Feb 09
0
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hey,
Did the heal completed and you still have some entries pending heal?
If yes then can you provide the following informations to debug the issue.
1. Which version of gluster you are running
2. gluster volume heal <volname> info summary or gluster volume heal
<volname> info
3. getfattr -d -e hex -m . <filepath-on-brick> output of any one of the
which is pending heal from all
2018 Feb 09
1
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hi Karthik,
Thank you very much, you made me much more relaxed. Below is getfattr output for a file from all the bricks:
root at gv2 ~ # getfattr -d -e hex -m . /data/glusterfs/testset/306/30677af808ad578916f54783904e6342.pack
getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names
# file: data/glusterfs/testset/306/30677af808ad578916f54783904e6342.pack
2018 Feb 09
0
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hi Karthik,
Thank you for your reply. The heal is still undergoing, as the /var/log/glusterfs/glustershd.log keeps growing, and there's a lot of pending entries in the heal info.
The gluster version is 3.10.9 and 3.10.10 (the version update in progress). It doesn't have info summary [yet?], and the heal info is way too long to attach here. (It takes more than 20 minutes just to collect
2018 Feb 08
5
self-heal trouble after changing arbiter brick
Hi folks,
I'm troubled moving an arbiter brick to another server because of I/O load issues. My setup is as follows:
# gluster volume info
Volume Name: myvol
Type: Distributed-Replicate
Volume ID: 43ba517a-ac09-461e-99da-a197759a7dc8
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 3 x (2 + 1) = 9
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: gv0:/data/glusterfs
Brick2: gv1:/data/glusterfs
Brick3:
2024 Jan 26
1
Gluster communication via TLS client problem
Hi to all,
The system is running Debian 12 with Gluster 10. All systems are using
the same versions.
I try to encrypt the communication between the peers and the clients via
TLS. The encryption between the peers works, but when I try to mount the
volume on the client I always get an error.
What have I done?
1. all hosts and clients can resolve the name of all systems involved.
2. the
2012 Oct 22
0
Lattice to ggplot2: Reference graphics across facets
Hi,
I'm playing with moving some of my lattice graphics into ggplot2, and I'd
like to ask how to achieve a couple of things, both of which are fully
illustrated in self-contained code (and mostly minimal, although that left
quite a bit) following this written description.
1. I quite often like to use a 'ghosted' reference across facets - for
example, in my example program below,
2013 Jul 24
1
Libvirt and Glusterfs pool
Hi,
I use the QEMU-GlusterFS native integration (no Fuse mount) with the
libvirt.
Now I create a volume issuing :
# qemu-img create gluster://localhost/gv1/test.img 5G
Then using the libvirt I declare the following lines in my domain.xml :
<disk type='network' device='disk'>
<driver name='qemu' cache='none'/>
<source
2011 Jan 10
3
Help with Data Transformation
Greetings,
I am new to R and am having trouble with parsing a file with the following characteristics:
* Individual results for a single sample are written to multiple lines.
* First 16 columns are constant from sample to sample.
* Remaining 10 need to be matched up (cross-tabbed?)
o (the exact contents for the remaining 10 vary from sample to sample, as indicated in
2024 Sep 29
1
Growing cluster: peering worked, staging failed
Fellow gluster users,
trying to extend a 3 node cluster that is serving me very reliably for
a long time now.
Cluster is serving two volumes:
Volume Name: gv0
Type: Distributed-Replicate
Volume ID: 9bafc4d2-d9b6-4b6d-a631-1cf42d1d2559
Status: Started
Snapshot Count: 0
Number of Bricks: 6 x (2 + 1) = 18
Transport-type: tcp
Volume Name: gv1
Type: Replicate
Volume ID: