similar to: plot scaling bug when using par(mfg)

It seems there are problems with mfg, both the old version .61.2 and the snapshot .62. > x<-rnorm(100) > y<-rnorm(100) > y1<-x/y > x11() > par(mfcol=c(2,1)) > par(mai=c(.6,.6,.2,.2)) > plot(x,y,mfg=c(2,1,2,1)) I'm not sure if 2,1 is considered the top or the bottom position on the page, but whether you say mfg=c(2,1,2,1) or mfg=c(1,1,2,1), the first

I'm working on my 'oce' package, trying split.screen() instead of par(mfrow). My code is too long to post, and I hope it's ok that I ask this question without doing so. My code seems to work fine when I source() it, but when I do "R CMD check" on my package, I get the error that I've put as the subject line, when it runs examples. If I comment out the plot()

I'm having a problem with the mfg option of par. Am I making an error in my usage? Here is a simple example that I thought would plot to the 4 corners of a 2x2 plot but doesn't plot to the lower right and plots twice on the upper left. par(mfrow = c(2, 2)) pos <- as.matrix(expand.grid(1:2, 1:2)) for (ix in 4:1) { par(mfg = pos[ix, ]) plot(1:5) } Thank you in advance. R version

Full_Name: Dan Freak Bolser Version: Version 2.0.0 (2004-10-04) OS: Linux 2.4.20-31.9 (RedHat 9) Submission from: (NULL) (62.253.128.15) The same problem I am having has been reported here

This is related to the incorrect bug report PR#7820. Marc Schwartz pointed out in https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2005-April/033016.html an example of a real problem. If you call par(mfg=) after par(mfrow) (or mfcol) and before you have done any plotting, NewPage is not called on the device at the start of the first page. That causes the DSC comments to be incorrect on postscript()

Full_Name: Craig A. McKinstry Version: 1.0.0 OS: WinNT4.0 and Win98 Submission from: (NULL) (192.101.100.130) When creating a multi-panel graphic, the command par(mfg=c(i,j,r,c)) is supposed to allow the user free movement between graphics panels to develop each panel separately. This works for the first invocation of par(mfg=c()) and for the first panel panel specified, but not for subsequent

Hi, a colleague of mine encountered some unexpected behavior regarding the postscript output from R. It's difficult for me to tell whether or not this is an R problem or a ghostview/gv/interpreter problem. Just to note, I think it's exactly the same situation reported here: http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/Rhelp02/archive/25436.html The following code produces a working plot (no

Ross Ihaka writes: > > I just checked my S manual and it appears that layout > parameters like can "mfg" only be given in par(). Yes. pty is another, for example. > I think that in fact "mfg" is only meant to be queried. No. One use for setting mfg is to produce a page of plots in portrait orientation with, say, two small plots on the top half of the page

Hi, I'm trying to add points to 2 plots on the fly using par(mfg=vector) so switch between them. However, the appropriate scales aren't switched when changing from one plot to another, e.g. par(mfcol=c(2,1)) plot(1,1, col="blue") # blue plot plot(1.2,1.2, col="red") # red plot points(1.1,1.1) # appears to bottom left of red point par(mfg=c(1,1)) #

The same problem I am having has been reported here http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/04a/0344.html Namely that using par(mfg=...) with a postscript (eps) for inclusion with latex makes the figure appear upside down and back to front (flipped)! Converting the dvi to ps makes matters worse (the eps seems to be broken), however, it appears fine with gv. Here is (basically) the code I am

The same problem I am having has been reported here http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/devel/04a/0344.html Namely that using par(mfg=...) with a postscript (eps) for inclusion with latex makes the figure appear upside down and back to front (flipped)! Converting the dvi to ps makes matters worse (the eps seems to be broken), however, it appears fine with gv. Here is (basically) the code I am

Hi I 've a data a=c(10,20,30) b=c(100,200,300) c=c(50,60,70) I want to compare a[1]<=c[1]<b[1],...... How to compare for all the records ----- Thanks in Advance Arun -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/comparing-three-vectors-tp4636728.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi guys, I am running glm(y~., data = history,family=binomial)-essentially, logistic regression for credit scoring (y = 0 or 1). The dataset 'history' has 14 variables, a few examples: history <- read.csv("history.csv". header = TRUE) 1> 'income = 100,200,300 (these are numbers in my dataset; however interpretation is that these are just tags or labels,for every

I have searched the r-help files but have not been able to find an answer to this question. I apologize if this questions has been asked previously. (Please excuse the ludicrousness of this example, as I have simplified my task for the purposes of this help inquiry. Please trust me that something like this will in fact be useful what I am trying to accomplish. I am using R 2.4.1 in Windows XP.)

Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help-es/attachments/20120614/518ed68f/attachment.html>

Dear all, I have a result my experiment like this below (here my toy example): foo1 <- list() foo1[[1]] <- c(10, 20, 30) foo1[[2]] <- c(11, 21, 31) foo2 <- list() foo2[[1]] <- c(100, 200, 300) foo2[[2]] <- c(110, 210, 310) foo3 <- list() foo3[[1]] <- c(1000, 2000, 3000) foo3[[2]] <- c(1100, 2100, 3100) list(foo1,foo2,foo3) The result: > list(foo1,foo2,foo3) [[1]]

Hi, I have small confusion in my configuration which is I had some DID's like 044578900-04457999. I was configured dial plan below mention. exten => _0XXXXXXXXX,1,NoOp(Int exten:${CALLERID(num)}) exten => _0XXXXXXXXX,2,Set(outgoing_ident=0445789${CALLERID(num):-2}) exten => _0XXXXXXXXX,3,NoOp(Ext ident:${outgoing_ident}) exten =>

I have a dataframe called "data" with 5 records (in rows) each of which has been scored on each of many variables (in columns). Five of the variables are named var1, var2, var3, var4, var5 using headers. The other variables are named using other conventions. I can create a new variable called var6 with the value 15 for each record with this code: > var6=var1+var2+var3+var4+var5