similar to: question of plm package

Dear Helen, bootstrapped standard errors are currently not supported in 'plm'. Cheers, Giovanni ------------------------------ Original Message: Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:23:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Helen Chen <96258011 at nccu.edu.tw> Subject: [R] question of plm package To: r-help at r-project.org Message-ID: <23190943.post at talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain;

Dear R help, I use the package plm the function plm() to analyse a panel data and estimate a fixeffect model. I use the code as follow : fe <- plm(y~x+z, data, model = "within") But I had a error message Error in model.frame.default(form, ...) : object is not a matrix I don't what's wrong. Beacuse others use the same codes and data,the code can

Hi, I am trying to estimate a quantile regression using panel data. I am trying to use the model that is described in Dr. Koenker's article. So I use the code the that is posted in the following link: http://www.econ.uiuc.edu/~roger/research/panel/rq.fit.panel.R How to estimate the panel data quantile regression if the regression contains no constant term? I tried to change the code of

Dear R help, I use the package plm e the function plm() to analyse a panel data and estimate a dynamic model. How can I estimate a model without intercept? Thanks, Andrea Ferroni [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello Giovanni I made a minor modification to your function, which now allows to compute the within R-sq in Twoways Within models (see below). However I ran into an issue that I have already encountered before: whenever I try to fit Twoways Within models on my unbalanced data, the process is strangely slow and I usually terminate it either after ~15min or when my CPU hits 100C. This is similar to

Hi, I am trying to run a panel regression using 88 observations and 9 variables. In-built Hausman Test did not work, then I found a code for auxiliary regression method for the Hausman test. The panel models are: fe=plm(gd ~ l+g+o+c+g1+h+n+r, model = "within", data = new.frame,index = c("id")) re=plm(gd ~ l+g+o+c+g1+h+n+r, model = "random", data = new.frame,index =

Dear all, First, I would like to thank you for your immense work. My question is about a frequent topic which I am not able to solve - even after hours of search in the mailing lisy. I would like to analyse random-effects (and fixed-effects)models of longitudinal / panel data with sampling weights. I have an unbalanced panel of different individuals in 5 years and income data as well as their

Dear R user I would like to run some panel regressions with R. Therefore I want to use fixed effect model. I consulted nlme package pdf. Unfortunately I couldn't find anything clear example about fixed effect model. Is there any defined function to calculate panel data under fixed effect model. I need some suggestions or examples. Thanks Best Helen Chen -- View this message in context:

Hello, I am trying to use the plm package for panel econometrics. I am just trying to get started and load my data. It seems from most of the sample documentation that I need to use the pdata.frame function to get my data loaded. However, even after installing the "plm" package, my R installation cannot find the function. I am trying to follow the example in plmEN.pdf (

Dear All, I'm looking to perform an ANOVA between two nested panel fixed effects models. I tried with anova, as well as with waldtest. anova tells me there is no method available for plm objects, while waldtest tells me my models are not nested. I think they are instead. The difference between the two models is that in the second I let the regression coefficients of a given variable variate

Hello, I am switching to R from Stata and I am having particular trouble with the transition from Stata's 'xtabond' and 'ivreg' commands to the "plm" package. I am trying to replicate some of the dynamic panel data work using the UK Employment data in Arellano and Bond (1991) and available as 'EmplUK' under the 'plm' package. I have been

Hello. Just a quick follow-up, for other 'plm' users on the list: - the problem turned out to be logs of zero values hidden in the big dataset - trying log(xx) would not reveal the problem, because log(0)=-Inf is a valid result in log() while it is an invalid input to plm() --> it is always advisable to try lm(yourformula, yourdata) as a first diagnostic check when plm(yourformula,

Hello, I got a problem using package plm. When I give the command "grun.fe<-plm(Y~X1+X2...+Xn, data=data, model="within")" I got this answer: "Error: cannot allocate vector of size 289.7 Gb". The database that I am using is not so big, so I don't understand to what it refers to. Can you help me, please? thank you! have a nice day [[alternative HTML

Dear plm Package users, I use the plm package a lot but I have not updated it for some times. Now I realized the following difficulty with the summary.plm function (demonstrated with the example from the ?plm documentation). library(plm) data("Produc", package="Ecdat") estimation_method<-"within" estimation_effect<-"individual" zz

Dear Sir, Thank you for accepting my request for registration on this site. I am trying to solve panel data problems using plm package , but while suing random effect model i am getting following messege saying " Warning message:In sqrt(sigma2) : NaNs produced " In some other cases i am getting message saying where TSS = NA , that I am not understanding I am sending you my code along

Dear Kailas Gokhale, The negative individual variance is not a problem with your code or plm. It a property of your data. Please check the posts of Giovanni Millo on this topic: [R] R: plm random effect: the estimated variance of the individual effect is negative Millo Giovanni Giovanni_Millo at Generali.com Sat Jan 5 10:10:01 CET 2013 You can find the posts in the archive by rseek.org.

Dear "plm"-Package insiders, [I posted the following observation is April already but unfortunately I am not aware of any answers. With the hope that someone found an answer in the mean time, I ask again:] I realized the following difficulty with the summary.plm function (demonstrated with the example from the ?plm documentation). library(plm) data("Produc",

Hello to all on the list, I'm trying to estimate a fixed effects model from a large (unbalanced) panel data set. I have no problems when using only an individual effect or only a time effect, but I get an error message when I try for a "twoways" effect. Here is some of the code: paneldata27 is the entire panel data set: > dim(paneldata27) [1] 1178831 8 >

I have an unexpected result with the functions lag() and diff() in the plm (panel data) package when used with transform(). These plm-specific functions are supposed to generate lags and first differences within each panel. lag() does not work properly the first time (it reproduces the same series--this is a common time series pitfall), BUT then it does work properly when it is run a second

Hi all, I have a problem in installing and using the plm package using R 2.2.0 on windows xp. I installed it from a .zip file downloaded from the CRAN. Apparently everything is ok: > utils:::menuInstallLocal() package 'plm' successfully unpacked and MD5 sums checked updating HTML package descriptions However, when I try to load it: > library(plm) Errore in lazyLoadDBfetch(key,